Cargando…

Emotion Elicitation: A Comparison of Pictures and Films

Pictures and film clips are widely used and accepted stimuli to elicit emotions. Based on theoretical arguments it is often assumed that the emotional effects of films exceed those of pictures, but to date this assumption has not been investigated directly. The aim of the present study was to compar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uhrig, Meike K., Trautmann, Nadine, Baumgärtner, Ulf, Treede, Rolf-Detlef, Henrich, Florian, Hiller, Wolfgang, Marschall, Susanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26925007
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00180
_version_ 1782416272274751488
author Uhrig, Meike K.
Trautmann, Nadine
Baumgärtner, Ulf
Treede, Rolf-Detlef
Henrich, Florian
Hiller, Wolfgang
Marschall, Susanne
author_facet Uhrig, Meike K.
Trautmann, Nadine
Baumgärtner, Ulf
Treede, Rolf-Detlef
Henrich, Florian
Hiller, Wolfgang
Marschall, Susanne
author_sort Uhrig, Meike K.
collection PubMed
description Pictures and film clips are widely used and accepted stimuli to elicit emotions. Based on theoretical arguments it is often assumed that the emotional effects of films exceed those of pictures, but to date this assumption has not been investigated directly. The aim of the present study was to compare pictures and films in terms of their capacity to induce emotions verified by means of explicit measures. Stimuli were (a) single pictures presented for 6 s, (b) a set of three consecutive pictures with emotionally congruent contents presented for 2 s each, (c) short film clips with a duration of 6 s. A total of 144 participants rated their emotion and arousal states following stimulus presentation. Repeated-measures ANOVAs revealed that the film clips and 3-picture version were as effective as the classical 1-picture method to elicit positive emotions, however, modulation toward positive valence was little. Modulation toward negative valence was more effective in general. Film clips were less effective than pictorial stimuli in producing the corresponding emotion states (all p < 0.001) and were less arousing (all p ≤ 0.02). Possible reasons for these unexpected results are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4756121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47561212016-02-26 Emotion Elicitation: A Comparison of Pictures and Films Uhrig, Meike K. Trautmann, Nadine Baumgärtner, Ulf Treede, Rolf-Detlef Henrich, Florian Hiller, Wolfgang Marschall, Susanne Front Psychol Psychology Pictures and film clips are widely used and accepted stimuli to elicit emotions. Based on theoretical arguments it is often assumed that the emotional effects of films exceed those of pictures, but to date this assumption has not been investigated directly. The aim of the present study was to compare pictures and films in terms of their capacity to induce emotions verified by means of explicit measures. Stimuli were (a) single pictures presented for 6 s, (b) a set of three consecutive pictures with emotionally congruent contents presented for 2 s each, (c) short film clips with a duration of 6 s. A total of 144 participants rated their emotion and arousal states following stimulus presentation. Repeated-measures ANOVAs revealed that the film clips and 3-picture version were as effective as the classical 1-picture method to elicit positive emotions, however, modulation toward positive valence was little. Modulation toward negative valence was more effective in general. Film clips were less effective than pictorial stimuli in producing the corresponding emotion states (all p < 0.001) and were less arousing (all p ≤ 0.02). Possible reasons for these unexpected results are discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4756121/ /pubmed/26925007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00180 Text en Copyright © 2016 Uhrig, Trautmann, Baumgärtner, Treede, Henrich, Hiller and Marschall. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Uhrig, Meike K.
Trautmann, Nadine
Baumgärtner, Ulf
Treede, Rolf-Detlef
Henrich, Florian
Hiller, Wolfgang
Marschall, Susanne
Emotion Elicitation: A Comparison of Pictures and Films
title Emotion Elicitation: A Comparison of Pictures and Films
title_full Emotion Elicitation: A Comparison of Pictures and Films
title_fullStr Emotion Elicitation: A Comparison of Pictures and Films
title_full_unstemmed Emotion Elicitation: A Comparison of Pictures and Films
title_short Emotion Elicitation: A Comparison of Pictures and Films
title_sort emotion elicitation: a comparison of pictures and films
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26925007
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00180
work_keys_str_mv AT uhrigmeikek emotionelicitationacomparisonofpicturesandfilms
AT trautmannnadine emotionelicitationacomparisonofpicturesandfilms
AT baumgartnerulf emotionelicitationacomparisonofpicturesandfilms
AT treederolfdetlef emotionelicitationacomparisonofpicturesandfilms
AT henrichflorian emotionelicitationacomparisonofpicturesandfilms
AT hillerwolfgang emotionelicitationacomparisonofpicturesandfilms
AT marschallsusanne emotionelicitationacomparisonofpicturesandfilms