Cargando…
Gossypiboma revisited: A never ending issue
INTRODUCTION: Leaving a surgical item inside the patient at the end of surgery, is one of the most dreadful complications. The item is frequently a surgical sponge and the resultant morbidity is usually severe. Additionally, the event poses considerable psychic strain to the operating team, notably...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26741272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.12.032 |
_version_ | 1782416282732199936 |
---|---|
author | Rabie, M. Ezzedien Hosni, Mohammad Hassan Al Safty, Alaa Al Jarallah, Manea Ghaleb, Fadel Hussain |
author_facet | Rabie, M. Ezzedien Hosni, Mohammad Hassan Al Safty, Alaa Al Jarallah, Manea Ghaleb, Fadel Hussain |
author_sort | Rabie, M. Ezzedien |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Leaving a surgical item inside the patient at the end of surgery, is one of the most dreadful complications. The item is frequently a surgical sponge and the resultant morbidity is usually severe. Additionally, the event poses considerable psychic strain to the operating team, notably the surgeon. PRESENTATION OF CASES: Here we describe the clinical course of three patients in whom a surgical sponge was missed, despite a seemingly correct count at the end of difficult caesarean sections. In two patients, who presented shortly after surgery, the pad was extracted with no bowel resection. In the third patient, who presented several years after surgery, colectomy was performed. DISCUSSION: Gossypiboma is under reported and the true incidence is largely unknown. Depending on the body reaction and the characters of the retained sponge, the patient may present within months to years after surgery. Risk factors for retained foreign objects include emergency surgery, an unplanned change in the surgical procedure, higher body mass index, multiple surgical teams, greater number of major procedures done at the same time and incorrect count recording. The surgical procedure needed to extract the retained sponge may be a simple one, as in the first case, or it may be more complex, as seen in the other two cases. Although holding the correct count at the end of surgery is the gold standard safeguard against this mishap, human errors continue to occur, as happened in our patients. For that reason, the correct count should be supplemented by employing one of the several new technologies currently available. CONCLUSION: Gossypiboma continues to occur, despite precautionary measures. As its consequences might cost the patient his life and the surgeon his professional reputation, extra preventive measures should be sought and implemented. New advances in technology should be incorporated in the theatre protocol as additional safeguard against human error. When encountered, a direct incision over the encapsulated swelling, in contrast to a formal laparotomy incision, might simplify the surgical procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4756180 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47561802016-03-02 Gossypiboma revisited: A never ending issue Rabie, M. Ezzedien Hosni, Mohammad Hassan Al Safty, Alaa Al Jarallah, Manea Ghaleb, Fadel Hussain Int J Surg Case Rep Case Series INTRODUCTION: Leaving a surgical item inside the patient at the end of surgery, is one of the most dreadful complications. The item is frequently a surgical sponge and the resultant morbidity is usually severe. Additionally, the event poses considerable psychic strain to the operating team, notably the surgeon. PRESENTATION OF CASES: Here we describe the clinical course of three patients in whom a surgical sponge was missed, despite a seemingly correct count at the end of difficult caesarean sections. In two patients, who presented shortly after surgery, the pad was extracted with no bowel resection. In the third patient, who presented several years after surgery, colectomy was performed. DISCUSSION: Gossypiboma is under reported and the true incidence is largely unknown. Depending on the body reaction and the characters of the retained sponge, the patient may present within months to years after surgery. Risk factors for retained foreign objects include emergency surgery, an unplanned change in the surgical procedure, higher body mass index, multiple surgical teams, greater number of major procedures done at the same time and incorrect count recording. The surgical procedure needed to extract the retained sponge may be a simple one, as in the first case, or it may be more complex, as seen in the other two cases. Although holding the correct count at the end of surgery is the gold standard safeguard against this mishap, human errors continue to occur, as happened in our patients. For that reason, the correct count should be supplemented by employing one of the several new technologies currently available. CONCLUSION: Gossypiboma continues to occur, despite precautionary measures. As its consequences might cost the patient his life and the surgeon his professional reputation, extra preventive measures should be sought and implemented. New advances in technology should be incorporated in the theatre protocol as additional safeguard against human error. When encountered, a direct incision over the encapsulated swelling, in contrast to a formal laparotomy incision, might simplify the surgical procedure. Elsevier 2015-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4756180/ /pubmed/26741272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.12.032 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Case Series Rabie, M. Ezzedien Hosni, Mohammad Hassan Al Safty, Alaa Al Jarallah, Manea Ghaleb, Fadel Hussain Gossypiboma revisited: A never ending issue |
title | Gossypiboma revisited: A never ending issue |
title_full | Gossypiboma revisited: A never ending issue |
title_fullStr | Gossypiboma revisited: A never ending issue |
title_full_unstemmed | Gossypiboma revisited: A never ending issue |
title_short | Gossypiboma revisited: A never ending issue |
title_sort | gossypiboma revisited: a never ending issue |
topic | Case Series |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26741272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.12.032 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rabiemezzedien gossypibomarevisitedaneverendingissue AT hosnimohammadhassan gossypibomarevisitedaneverendingissue AT alsaftyalaa gossypibomarevisitedaneverendingissue AT aljarallahmanea gossypibomarevisitedaneverendingissue AT ghalebfadelhussain gossypibomarevisitedaneverendingissue |