Cargando…

Prognosis Risk of Urosepsis in Critical Care Medicine: A Prospective Observational Study

This study aimed to investigate the clinical features of urosepsis and to raise awareness of this problem. Of the 112 sepsis patients enrolled, 36 were identified as having urosepsis. The bacteria involved in the infection leading to urosepsis included Escherichia coli, Proteus species, Enterococcus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qiang, Xin-Hua, Yu, Tie-Ou, Li, Yi-Nan, Zhou, Li-Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26955639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9028924
_version_ 1782416283909750784
author Qiang, Xin-Hua
Yu, Tie-Ou
Li, Yi-Nan
Zhou, Li-Xin
author_facet Qiang, Xin-Hua
Yu, Tie-Ou
Li, Yi-Nan
Zhou, Li-Xin
author_sort Qiang, Xin-Hua
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to investigate the clinical features of urosepsis and to raise awareness of this problem. Of the 112 sepsis patients enrolled, 36 were identified as having urosepsis. The bacteria involved in the infection leading to urosepsis included Escherichia coli, Proteus species, Enterococcus species, Klebsiella species, other Gram-positive cocci, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Although the organ/system dysfunction appeared earlier in the urosepsis patients than in the other sepsis patients (4.7 ± 2.4 versus 7.2 ± 4.5 hours, P < 0.001), the urosepsis patients presented with a better prognosis and lower 28-day mortality rate than the others (6% versus 37%). In the multivariate analysis, the type of sepsis (urosepsis, OR = 0.019, 95% CI = 0.001, 0.335, P = 0.007) and SOFA score (OR = 1.896, 95% CI = 1.012, 3.554, P = 0.046) remained significantly associated with the survival. The time of admission to the intensive care unit of 17 patients transferred from the Department of Urinary Surgery was significantly prolonged compared with those transferred from other departments (11.6 ± 7.3 versus 7.2 ± 4.9 hours, P < 0.05). In conclusion, urosepsis suggested a better prognosis, but attention needs to be paid in clinical practice, especially in urinary surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4756185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47561852016-03-07 Prognosis Risk of Urosepsis in Critical Care Medicine: A Prospective Observational Study Qiang, Xin-Hua Yu, Tie-Ou Li, Yi-Nan Zhou, Li-Xin Biomed Res Int Research Article This study aimed to investigate the clinical features of urosepsis and to raise awareness of this problem. Of the 112 sepsis patients enrolled, 36 were identified as having urosepsis. The bacteria involved in the infection leading to urosepsis included Escherichia coli, Proteus species, Enterococcus species, Klebsiella species, other Gram-positive cocci, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Although the organ/system dysfunction appeared earlier in the urosepsis patients than in the other sepsis patients (4.7 ± 2.4 versus 7.2 ± 4.5 hours, P < 0.001), the urosepsis patients presented with a better prognosis and lower 28-day mortality rate than the others (6% versus 37%). In the multivariate analysis, the type of sepsis (urosepsis, OR = 0.019, 95% CI = 0.001, 0.335, P = 0.007) and SOFA score (OR = 1.896, 95% CI = 1.012, 3.554, P = 0.046) remained significantly associated with the survival. The time of admission to the intensive care unit of 17 patients transferred from the Department of Urinary Surgery was significantly prolonged compared with those transferred from other departments (11.6 ± 7.3 versus 7.2 ± 4.9 hours, P < 0.05). In conclusion, urosepsis suggested a better prognosis, but attention needs to be paid in clinical practice, especially in urinary surgery. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4756185/ /pubmed/26955639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9028924 Text en Copyright © 2016 Xin-Hua Qiang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Qiang, Xin-Hua
Yu, Tie-Ou
Li, Yi-Nan
Zhou, Li-Xin
Prognosis Risk of Urosepsis in Critical Care Medicine: A Prospective Observational Study
title Prognosis Risk of Urosepsis in Critical Care Medicine: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full Prognosis Risk of Urosepsis in Critical Care Medicine: A Prospective Observational Study
title_fullStr Prognosis Risk of Urosepsis in Critical Care Medicine: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Prognosis Risk of Urosepsis in Critical Care Medicine: A Prospective Observational Study
title_short Prognosis Risk of Urosepsis in Critical Care Medicine: A Prospective Observational Study
title_sort prognosis risk of urosepsis in critical care medicine: a prospective observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26955639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9028924
work_keys_str_mv AT qiangxinhua prognosisriskofurosepsisincriticalcaremedicineaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT yutieou prognosisriskofurosepsisincriticalcaremedicineaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT liyinan prognosisriskofurosepsisincriticalcaremedicineaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT zhoulixin prognosisriskofurosepsisincriticalcaremedicineaprospectiveobservationalstudy