Cargando…

Assessment of QT and JT Intervals in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block

BACKGROUND: Prolongation of the QT interval is considered a risk factor for cardiac adverse events and mortality. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) lengthens the QT interval. The corrected QT interval (QTc) is most likely overestimated because its prolongation is caused by increases in depolarization...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tabatabaei, Peyman, Keikhavani, Ala, Haghjoo, Majid, Fazelifar, Amirfarjam, Emkanjoo, Zahra, Zeighami, Mahbobeh, Bakhshandeh, Hooman, Ghadrdoost, Behshid, Alizadeh, Abolfath
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949694
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/cardiovascmed.31528
_version_ 1782416295567818752
author Tabatabaei, Peyman
Keikhavani, Ala
Haghjoo, Majid
Fazelifar, Amirfarjam
Emkanjoo, Zahra
Zeighami, Mahbobeh
Bakhshandeh, Hooman
Ghadrdoost, Behshid
Alizadeh, Abolfath
author_facet Tabatabaei, Peyman
Keikhavani, Ala
Haghjoo, Majid
Fazelifar, Amirfarjam
Emkanjoo, Zahra
Zeighami, Mahbobeh
Bakhshandeh, Hooman
Ghadrdoost, Behshid
Alizadeh, Abolfath
author_sort Tabatabaei, Peyman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prolongation of the QT interval is considered a risk factor for cardiac adverse events and mortality. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) lengthens the QT interval. The corrected QT interval (QTc) is most likely overestimated because its prolongation is caused by increases in depolarization duration and not in repolarization. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to apply corrected JT interval (JTc) as an appropriate measure of ventricular repolarization for predicting QTc in a formula. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 101 patients with sinus rhythm (SR) and narrow QRS complexes (< 120 milliseconds). All patients underwent electrophysiology studies or ablation. A diagnostic catheter was positioned in the right ventricular apex (RVA) to induce LBBB at two different cycle lengths (CLs; 600 and 700 mv). The intrinsic QRS complex, QT time, and JT time were measured during SR and subsequent RVA pacing. The JTc was derived simply by subtracting the QRS duration from the QTc. RESULTS: Stimulation from the RVA increased the QTc from 456.20 ± 38.63 ms to 530.67 ± 47.73 ms at a CL of 600 (P < 0.0001) and to 502.32 ± 47.26 ms at 700 CL (P < 0.0001). JTc showed no significant changes with stimulation from the RVA (102.97 ± 11.35 ms vs. 103.59 ± 10.67 ms, P = 0.24). There was no significant correlation between JTc and QRS complex duration. A significant correlation was seen between QRS and QTc at both CLs. The ROC curve indicated that sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 67% were obtained with JTc duration of 92.6 ms. CONCLUSIONS: Right ventricular pacing increases the QT interval without increasing the JT interval. Our results confirm that JTc, as an index of repolarization, is independent of ventricular depolarization. Therefore, it can be applied for predicting QTc in patients with LBBB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4756254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47562542016-03-05 Assessment of QT and JT Intervals in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block Tabatabaei, Peyman Keikhavani, Ala Haghjoo, Majid Fazelifar, Amirfarjam Emkanjoo, Zahra Zeighami, Mahbobeh Bakhshandeh, Hooman Ghadrdoost, Behshid Alizadeh, Abolfath Res Cardiovasc Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Prolongation of the QT interval is considered a risk factor for cardiac adverse events and mortality. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) lengthens the QT interval. The corrected QT interval (QTc) is most likely overestimated because its prolongation is caused by increases in depolarization duration and not in repolarization. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to apply corrected JT interval (JTc) as an appropriate measure of ventricular repolarization for predicting QTc in a formula. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 101 patients with sinus rhythm (SR) and narrow QRS complexes (< 120 milliseconds). All patients underwent electrophysiology studies or ablation. A diagnostic catheter was positioned in the right ventricular apex (RVA) to induce LBBB at two different cycle lengths (CLs; 600 and 700 mv). The intrinsic QRS complex, QT time, and JT time were measured during SR and subsequent RVA pacing. The JTc was derived simply by subtracting the QRS duration from the QTc. RESULTS: Stimulation from the RVA increased the QTc from 456.20 ± 38.63 ms to 530.67 ± 47.73 ms at a CL of 600 (P < 0.0001) and to 502.32 ± 47.26 ms at 700 CL (P < 0.0001). JTc showed no significant changes with stimulation from the RVA (102.97 ± 11.35 ms vs. 103.59 ± 10.67 ms, P = 0.24). There was no significant correlation between JTc and QRS complex duration. A significant correlation was seen between QRS and QTc at both CLs. The ROC curve indicated that sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 67% were obtained with JTc duration of 92.6 ms. CONCLUSIONS: Right ventricular pacing increases the QT interval without increasing the JT interval. Our results confirm that JTc, as an index of repolarization, is independent of ventricular depolarization. Therefore, it can be applied for predicting QTc in patients with LBBB. Kowsar 2016-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4756254/ /pubmed/26949694 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/cardiovascmed.31528 Text en Copyright © 2016, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tabatabaei, Peyman
Keikhavani, Ala
Haghjoo, Majid
Fazelifar, Amirfarjam
Emkanjoo, Zahra
Zeighami, Mahbobeh
Bakhshandeh, Hooman
Ghadrdoost, Behshid
Alizadeh, Abolfath
Assessment of QT and JT Intervals in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block
title Assessment of QT and JT Intervals in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block
title_full Assessment of QT and JT Intervals in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block
title_fullStr Assessment of QT and JT Intervals in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of QT and JT Intervals in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block
title_short Assessment of QT and JT Intervals in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block
title_sort assessment of qt and jt intervals in patients with left bundle branch block
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949694
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/cardiovascmed.31528
work_keys_str_mv AT tabatabaeipeyman assessmentofqtandjtintervalsinpatientswithleftbundlebranchblock
AT keikhavaniala assessmentofqtandjtintervalsinpatientswithleftbundlebranchblock
AT haghjoomajid assessmentofqtandjtintervalsinpatientswithleftbundlebranchblock
AT fazelifaramirfarjam assessmentofqtandjtintervalsinpatientswithleftbundlebranchblock
AT emkanjoozahra assessmentofqtandjtintervalsinpatientswithleftbundlebranchblock
AT zeighamimahbobeh assessmentofqtandjtintervalsinpatientswithleftbundlebranchblock
AT bakhshandehhooman assessmentofqtandjtintervalsinpatientswithleftbundlebranchblock
AT ghadrdoostbehshid assessmentofqtandjtintervalsinpatientswithleftbundlebranchblock
AT alizadehabolfath assessmentofqtandjtintervalsinpatientswithleftbundlebranchblock