Cargando…

Prospective randomized trial to compare the outcome and tolerability of delivering the same total dose of radiation in 61/2 weeks versus 51/2 weeks time in head and neck cancers

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiation is currently considered to be the standard of care in the treatment of head and neck cancer. In developing countries like ours, a good number of patients cannot tolerate chemoradiation because of the poor general condition and financial constraints. Those patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Manoj, Vats, Siddharth, Bhattacharyya, Tapesh, Seem, Rajeev K., Gupta, Manish, Mahajan, Rohit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942141
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-330X.173168
_version_ 1782416340868399104
author Gupta, Manoj
Vats, Siddharth
Bhattacharyya, Tapesh
Seem, Rajeev K.
Gupta, Manish
Mahajan, Rohit
author_facet Gupta, Manoj
Vats, Siddharth
Bhattacharyya, Tapesh
Seem, Rajeev K.
Gupta, Manish
Mahajan, Rohit
author_sort Gupta, Manoj
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiation is currently considered to be the standard of care in the treatment of head and neck cancer. In developing countries like ours, a good number of patients cannot tolerate chemoradiation because of the poor general condition and financial constraints. Those patients are treated with radiation alone. The optimum radiotherapy (RT) schedule for best local control and acceptable toxicity is not yet clear. We aimed to find out whether shortening of treatment time using six instead of five RT fractions per week improves the locoregional control in squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized study for a period of 2 years from September 2007 to August 2009 in 109 untreated patients of squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck with histologically confirmed diagnosis and no evidence of distant metastasis. Study group (55 patients) received accelerated RT with 6 fractions per week (66 Gy/33#/51/2 weeks). Control group (54 patients) received conventional RT with 5 fractions per week (66 Gy/33#/61/2 weeks). Tumor control, survival, acute and late toxicities were assessed. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 43 months, 29 patients (52.7%) in the 6 fractions group and 24 patients (44.4%) in the 5 fractions group were disease-free (P = 0.852). The benefit of shortening was higher for advanced disease control though it was not statistically significant. Grade 3 and 4 skin toxicity was significantly higher in the accelerated RT (70.9%) arm as compared to conventional (35.1%) arm (P = 0.04). Grade 3 mucositis was significantly higher in the accelerated RT arm (32.7% vs. 16.6%; P = 0.041). Those acute toxicities were managed conservatively. There was no difference in late toxicities between the two arms. CONCLUSION: Use of 6 fractions per week instead of 5 fractions per week is feasible, tolerable, and results in a better outcome in the patients of head and neck cancers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4756485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47564852016-03-03 Prospective randomized trial to compare the outcome and tolerability of delivering the same total dose of radiation in 61/2 weeks versus 51/2 weeks time in head and neck cancers Gupta, Manoj Vats, Siddharth Bhattacharyya, Tapesh Seem, Rajeev K. Gupta, Manish Mahajan, Rohit South Asian J Cancer HEAD AND NECK CANCERS: Original Article BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiation is currently considered to be the standard of care in the treatment of head and neck cancer. In developing countries like ours, a good number of patients cannot tolerate chemoradiation because of the poor general condition and financial constraints. Those patients are treated with radiation alone. The optimum radiotherapy (RT) schedule for best local control and acceptable toxicity is not yet clear. We aimed to find out whether shortening of treatment time using six instead of five RT fractions per week improves the locoregional control in squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized study for a period of 2 years from September 2007 to August 2009 in 109 untreated patients of squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck with histologically confirmed diagnosis and no evidence of distant metastasis. Study group (55 patients) received accelerated RT with 6 fractions per week (66 Gy/33#/51/2 weeks). Control group (54 patients) received conventional RT with 5 fractions per week (66 Gy/33#/61/2 weeks). Tumor control, survival, acute and late toxicities were assessed. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 43 months, 29 patients (52.7%) in the 6 fractions group and 24 patients (44.4%) in the 5 fractions group were disease-free (P = 0.852). The benefit of shortening was higher for advanced disease control though it was not statistically significant. Grade 3 and 4 skin toxicity was significantly higher in the accelerated RT (70.9%) arm as compared to conventional (35.1%) arm (P = 0.04). Grade 3 mucositis was significantly higher in the accelerated RT arm (32.7% vs. 16.6%; P = 0.041). Those acute toxicities were managed conservatively. There was no difference in late toxicities between the two arms. CONCLUSION: Use of 6 fractions per week instead of 5 fractions per week is feasible, tolerable, and results in a better outcome in the patients of head and neck cancers. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4756485/ /pubmed/26942141 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-330X.173168 Text en Copyright: © South Asian Journal of Cancer http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle HEAD AND NECK CANCERS: Original Article
Gupta, Manoj
Vats, Siddharth
Bhattacharyya, Tapesh
Seem, Rajeev K.
Gupta, Manish
Mahajan, Rohit
Prospective randomized trial to compare the outcome and tolerability of delivering the same total dose of radiation in 61/2 weeks versus 51/2 weeks time in head and neck cancers
title Prospective randomized trial to compare the outcome and tolerability of delivering the same total dose of radiation in 61/2 weeks versus 51/2 weeks time in head and neck cancers
title_full Prospective randomized trial to compare the outcome and tolerability of delivering the same total dose of radiation in 61/2 weeks versus 51/2 weeks time in head and neck cancers
title_fullStr Prospective randomized trial to compare the outcome and tolerability of delivering the same total dose of radiation in 61/2 weeks versus 51/2 weeks time in head and neck cancers
title_full_unstemmed Prospective randomized trial to compare the outcome and tolerability of delivering the same total dose of radiation in 61/2 weeks versus 51/2 weeks time in head and neck cancers
title_short Prospective randomized trial to compare the outcome and tolerability of delivering the same total dose of radiation in 61/2 weeks versus 51/2 weeks time in head and neck cancers
title_sort prospective randomized trial to compare the outcome and tolerability of delivering the same total dose of radiation in 61/2 weeks versus 51/2 weeks time in head and neck cancers
topic HEAD AND NECK CANCERS: Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942141
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-330X.173168
work_keys_str_mv AT guptamanoj prospectiverandomizedtrialtocomparetheoutcomeandtolerabilityofdeliveringthesametotaldoseofradiationin612weeksversus512weekstimeinheadandneckcancers
AT vatssiddharth prospectiverandomizedtrialtocomparetheoutcomeandtolerabilityofdeliveringthesametotaldoseofradiationin612weeksversus512weekstimeinheadandneckcancers
AT bhattacharyyatapesh prospectiverandomizedtrialtocomparetheoutcomeandtolerabilityofdeliveringthesametotaldoseofradiationin612weeksversus512weekstimeinheadandneckcancers
AT seemrajeevk prospectiverandomizedtrialtocomparetheoutcomeandtolerabilityofdeliveringthesametotaldoseofradiationin612weeksversus512weekstimeinheadandneckcancers
AT guptamanish prospectiverandomizedtrialtocomparetheoutcomeandtolerabilityofdeliveringthesametotaldoseofradiationin612weeksversus512weekstimeinheadandneckcancers
AT mahajanrohit prospectiverandomizedtrialtocomparetheoutcomeandtolerabilityofdeliveringthesametotaldoseofradiationin612weeksversus512weekstimeinheadandneckcancers