Cargando…

Effectiveness of adaptive silverware on range of motion of the hand

Background. Hand function is essential to a person’s self-efficacy and greatly affects quality of life. Adapted utensils with handles of increased diameters have historically been used to assist individuals with arthritis or other hand disabilities for feeding, and other related activities of daily...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McDonald, Susan S., Levine, David, Richards, Jim, Aguilar, Lauren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26893960
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1667
_version_ 1782416388744282112
author McDonald, Susan S.
Levine, David
Richards, Jim
Aguilar, Lauren
author_facet McDonald, Susan S.
Levine, David
Richards, Jim
Aguilar, Lauren
author_sort McDonald, Susan S.
collection PubMed
description Background. Hand function is essential to a person’s self-efficacy and greatly affects quality of life. Adapted utensils with handles of increased diameters have historically been used to assist individuals with arthritis or other hand disabilities for feeding, and other related activities of daily living. To date, minimal research has examined the biomechanical effects of modified handles, or quantified the differences in ranges of motion (ROM) when using a standard versus a modified handle. The aim of this study was to quantify the ranges of motion (ROM) required for a healthy hand to use different adaptive spoons with electrogoniometry for the purpose of understanding the physiologic advantages that adapted spoons may provide patients with limited ROM. Methods. Hand measurements included the distal interphalangeal joint (DIP), proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP), and metacarpophalangeal joint (MCP) for each finger and the interphalangeal (IP) and MCP joint for the thumb. Participants were 34 females age 18–30 (mean age 20.38 ± 1.67) with no previous hand injuries or abnormalities. Participants grasped spoons with standard handles, and spoons with handle diameters of 3.18 cm (1.25 inch), and 4.45 cm (1.75 inch). ROM measurements were obtained with an electrogoniometer to record the angle at each joint for each of the spoon handle sizes. Results. A 3 × 3 × 4 repeated measures ANOVA (Spoon handle size by Joint by Finger) found main effects on ROM of Joint (F(2, 33) = 318.68, Partial η(2) = .95, p < .001), Spoon handle size (F(2, 33) = 598.73, Partial η(2) = .97, p < .001), and Finger (F(3, 32) = 163.83, Partial η(2) = .94, p < .001). As the spoon handle diameter size increased, the range of motion utilized to grasp the spoon handle decreased in all joints and all fingers (p < 0.01). Discussion. This study confirms the hypothesis that less range of motion is required to grip utensils with larger diameter handles, which in turn may reduce challenges for patients with limited ROM of the hand.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4756747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47567472016-02-18 Effectiveness of adaptive silverware on range of motion of the hand McDonald, Susan S. Levine, David Richards, Jim Aguilar, Lauren PeerJ Kinesiology Background. Hand function is essential to a person’s self-efficacy and greatly affects quality of life. Adapted utensils with handles of increased diameters have historically been used to assist individuals with arthritis or other hand disabilities for feeding, and other related activities of daily living. To date, minimal research has examined the biomechanical effects of modified handles, or quantified the differences in ranges of motion (ROM) when using a standard versus a modified handle. The aim of this study was to quantify the ranges of motion (ROM) required for a healthy hand to use different adaptive spoons with electrogoniometry for the purpose of understanding the physiologic advantages that adapted spoons may provide patients with limited ROM. Methods. Hand measurements included the distal interphalangeal joint (DIP), proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP), and metacarpophalangeal joint (MCP) for each finger and the interphalangeal (IP) and MCP joint for the thumb. Participants were 34 females age 18–30 (mean age 20.38 ± 1.67) with no previous hand injuries or abnormalities. Participants grasped spoons with standard handles, and spoons with handle diameters of 3.18 cm (1.25 inch), and 4.45 cm (1.75 inch). ROM measurements were obtained with an electrogoniometer to record the angle at each joint for each of the spoon handle sizes. Results. A 3 × 3 × 4 repeated measures ANOVA (Spoon handle size by Joint by Finger) found main effects on ROM of Joint (F(2, 33) = 318.68, Partial η(2) = .95, p < .001), Spoon handle size (F(2, 33) = 598.73, Partial η(2) = .97, p < .001), and Finger (F(3, 32) = 163.83, Partial η(2) = .94, p < .001). As the spoon handle diameter size increased, the range of motion utilized to grasp the spoon handle decreased in all joints and all fingers (p < 0.01). Discussion. This study confirms the hypothesis that less range of motion is required to grip utensils with larger diameter handles, which in turn may reduce challenges for patients with limited ROM of the hand. PeerJ Inc. 2016-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4756747/ /pubmed/26893960 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1667 Text en ©2016 McDonald et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Kinesiology
McDonald, Susan S.
Levine, David
Richards, Jim
Aguilar, Lauren
Effectiveness of adaptive silverware on range of motion of the hand
title Effectiveness of adaptive silverware on range of motion of the hand
title_full Effectiveness of adaptive silverware on range of motion of the hand
title_fullStr Effectiveness of adaptive silverware on range of motion of the hand
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of adaptive silverware on range of motion of the hand
title_short Effectiveness of adaptive silverware on range of motion of the hand
title_sort effectiveness of adaptive silverware on range of motion of the hand
topic Kinesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26893960
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1667
work_keys_str_mv AT mcdonaldsusans effectivenessofadaptivesilverwareonrangeofmotionofthehand
AT levinedavid effectivenessofadaptivesilverwareonrangeofmotionofthehand
AT richardsjim effectivenessofadaptivesilverwareonrangeofmotionofthehand
AT aguilarlauren effectivenessofadaptivesilverwareonrangeofmotionofthehand