Cargando…

Mini incision open pyeloplasty - Improvement in patient outcome

PURPOSE: To assess the subjective and objective outcomes of mini-incision dismembered Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in the treatment of primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2008 to January 2013, Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty was performed in 71 patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Vishwajeet, Garg, Manish, Sharma, Pradeep, Sinha, Rahul Janak, Kumar, Manoj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26689518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0024
_version_ 1782416430065516544
author Singh, Vishwajeet
Garg, Manish
Sharma, Pradeep
Sinha, Rahul Janak
Kumar, Manoj
author_facet Singh, Vishwajeet
Garg, Manish
Sharma, Pradeep
Sinha, Rahul Janak
Kumar, Manoj
author_sort Singh, Vishwajeet
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the subjective and objective outcomes of mini-incision dismembered Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in the treatment of primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2008 to January 2013, Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty was performed in 71 patients diagnosed with primary UPJO. Small subcostal muscle splitting incision was used in all cases. Sixteen patients with renal calculi underwent concomitant pyelolithotomy. Subjective outcome was assessed using visual pain analogue score (VAS). For objective assessment, the improvement in differential renal function (DRF) and radio-tracer wash out time (T1/2) on Tc-99m DTPA scan and decrease in hydronephrosis (HDN) on renal ultrasound (USG) and urography (IVU) were assessed. RESULTS: Mean incision length was 5.2 cm. The average operating time and postoperative hospital stay was 63 (52-124) minutes and 2.5 (2–6) days respectively. Concomitant renal calculi were successfully removed in all the patients. Overall complication rates were 8.4% and overall success rate was 98.6% at median follow-up of 16 months. There was significant improvement in pain score (p=0.0001) and significant decrease in HDN after the procedure. While preoperative mean T1/2 was 26.7±6.4 minutes, postoperative half-time decreased to 7.8±4.2 minutes at 6 months and to 6.7±3.3 minutes at 1 year. Mean pre-operative DRF was 26.45% and it was 31.38% and 33.19% at 6 months and 1 year respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mini-incision pyeloplasty is a safe and effective technique with combined advantage of high success rates of standard open pyeloplasty with decreased morbidity of laparoscopic approach. Excellent functional and objective outcomes can be achieved without extra technical difficulty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4756969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47569692016-05-09 Mini incision open pyeloplasty - Improvement in patient outcome Singh, Vishwajeet Garg, Manish Sharma, Pradeep Sinha, Rahul Janak Kumar, Manoj Int Braz J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: To assess the subjective and objective outcomes of mini-incision dismembered Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in the treatment of primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2008 to January 2013, Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty was performed in 71 patients diagnosed with primary UPJO. Small subcostal muscle splitting incision was used in all cases. Sixteen patients with renal calculi underwent concomitant pyelolithotomy. Subjective outcome was assessed using visual pain analogue score (VAS). For objective assessment, the improvement in differential renal function (DRF) and radio-tracer wash out time (T1/2) on Tc-99m DTPA scan and decrease in hydronephrosis (HDN) on renal ultrasound (USG) and urography (IVU) were assessed. RESULTS: Mean incision length was 5.2 cm. The average operating time and postoperative hospital stay was 63 (52-124) minutes and 2.5 (2–6) days respectively. Concomitant renal calculi were successfully removed in all the patients. Overall complication rates were 8.4% and overall success rate was 98.6% at median follow-up of 16 months. There was significant improvement in pain score (p=0.0001) and significant decrease in HDN after the procedure. While preoperative mean T1/2 was 26.7±6.4 minutes, postoperative half-time decreased to 7.8±4.2 minutes at 6 months and to 6.7±3.3 minutes at 1 year. Mean pre-operative DRF was 26.45% and it was 31.38% and 33.19% at 6 months and 1 year respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mini-incision pyeloplasty is a safe and effective technique with combined advantage of high success rates of standard open pyeloplasty with decreased morbidity of laparoscopic approach. Excellent functional and objective outcomes can be achieved without extra technical difficulty. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4756969/ /pubmed/26689518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0024 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Singh, Vishwajeet
Garg, Manish
Sharma, Pradeep
Sinha, Rahul Janak
Kumar, Manoj
Mini incision open pyeloplasty - Improvement in patient outcome
title Mini incision open pyeloplasty - Improvement in patient outcome
title_full Mini incision open pyeloplasty - Improvement in patient outcome
title_fullStr Mini incision open pyeloplasty - Improvement in patient outcome
title_full_unstemmed Mini incision open pyeloplasty - Improvement in patient outcome
title_short Mini incision open pyeloplasty - Improvement in patient outcome
title_sort mini incision open pyeloplasty - improvement in patient outcome
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26689518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0024
work_keys_str_mv AT singhvishwajeet miniincisionopenpyeloplastyimprovementinpatientoutcome
AT gargmanish miniincisionopenpyeloplastyimprovementinpatientoutcome
AT sharmapradeep miniincisionopenpyeloplastyimprovementinpatientoutcome
AT sinharahuljanak miniincisionopenpyeloplastyimprovementinpatientoutcome
AT kumarmanoj miniincisionopenpyeloplastyimprovementinpatientoutcome