Cargando…

The efficacy of peritubal analgesic infiltration in postoperative pain following percutaneous nephrolithotomy – A prospective randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of peritubal infiltration in postoperative pain following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in general PCNL patients and PCNL patients with supracostal renal access. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 105 PCNL patients were randomized into two groups, 53 patients receiving...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lojanapiwat, Bannakij, Chureemas, Tanarit, Kittirattarakarn, Pruit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26689520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0471
_version_ 1782416430498578432
author Lojanapiwat, Bannakij
Chureemas, Tanarit
Kittirattarakarn, Pruit
author_facet Lojanapiwat, Bannakij
Chureemas, Tanarit
Kittirattarakarn, Pruit
author_sort Lojanapiwat, Bannakij
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of peritubal infiltration in postoperative pain following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in general PCNL patients and PCNL patients with supracostal renal access. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 105 PCNL patients were randomized into two groups, 53 patients receiving peritubal analgesic infiltration (study group) and 52 patients as the control group. Of these patients, supracostal access was performed in 22 patients of study group and 23 patients of control group. The study group received peritubal injection with 10mL of bupivacain. Postoperative pain as the primary outcome was assessed by using visual analogue scale at 1, 4, 12, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were the total postoperative morphine usage in 24 hours and time of the first analgesic demand. RESULTS: The average VAS pain at 1 and 4 hours after the operation in the study group were significant lower in the control group (P≤0.001 and 0.026). Doses of morphine usage for controlling postoperative pain and the first analgesic demand were significantly lower and longer in study group. Among patients submitted to supracostal access, the average VAS pain at 1 hour after operation in the study group was lower (P=0.018). Doses of morphine usage for controlling postoperative pain also was lower in the study group (P=0.012). CONCLUSION: The peritubal local anesthetic infiltration is effective in alleviating immediate postoperative pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy even with supracostal access.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4756971
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47569712016-05-09 The efficacy of peritubal analgesic infiltration in postoperative pain following percutaneous nephrolithotomy – A prospective randomized controlled study Lojanapiwat, Bannakij Chureemas, Tanarit Kittirattarakarn, Pruit Int Braz J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of peritubal infiltration in postoperative pain following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in general PCNL patients and PCNL patients with supracostal renal access. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 105 PCNL patients were randomized into two groups, 53 patients receiving peritubal analgesic infiltration (study group) and 52 patients as the control group. Of these patients, supracostal access was performed in 22 patients of study group and 23 patients of control group. The study group received peritubal injection with 10mL of bupivacain. Postoperative pain as the primary outcome was assessed by using visual analogue scale at 1, 4, 12, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were the total postoperative morphine usage in 24 hours and time of the first analgesic demand. RESULTS: The average VAS pain at 1 and 4 hours after the operation in the study group were significant lower in the control group (P≤0.001 and 0.026). Doses of morphine usage for controlling postoperative pain and the first analgesic demand were significantly lower and longer in study group. Among patients submitted to supracostal access, the average VAS pain at 1 hour after operation in the study group was lower (P=0.018). Doses of morphine usage for controlling postoperative pain also was lower in the study group (P=0.012). CONCLUSION: The peritubal local anesthetic infiltration is effective in alleviating immediate postoperative pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy even with supracostal access. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4756971/ /pubmed/26689520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0471 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lojanapiwat, Bannakij
Chureemas, Tanarit
Kittirattarakarn, Pruit
The efficacy of peritubal analgesic infiltration in postoperative pain following percutaneous nephrolithotomy – A prospective randomized controlled study
title The efficacy of peritubal analgesic infiltration in postoperative pain following percutaneous nephrolithotomy – A prospective randomized controlled study
title_full The efficacy of peritubal analgesic infiltration in postoperative pain following percutaneous nephrolithotomy – A prospective randomized controlled study
title_fullStr The efficacy of peritubal analgesic infiltration in postoperative pain following percutaneous nephrolithotomy – A prospective randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of peritubal analgesic infiltration in postoperative pain following percutaneous nephrolithotomy – A prospective randomized controlled study
title_short The efficacy of peritubal analgesic infiltration in postoperative pain following percutaneous nephrolithotomy – A prospective randomized controlled study
title_sort efficacy of peritubal analgesic infiltration in postoperative pain following percutaneous nephrolithotomy – a prospective randomized controlled study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26689520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0471
work_keys_str_mv AT lojanapiwatbannakij theefficacyofperitubalanalgesicinfiltrationinpostoperativepainfollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT chureemastanarit theefficacyofperitubalanalgesicinfiltrationinpostoperativepainfollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kittirattarakarnpruit theefficacyofperitubalanalgesicinfiltrationinpostoperativepainfollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT lojanapiwatbannakij efficacyofperitubalanalgesicinfiltrationinpostoperativepainfollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT chureemastanarit efficacyofperitubalanalgesicinfiltrationinpostoperativepainfollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kittirattarakarnpruit efficacyofperitubalanalgesicinfiltrationinpostoperativepainfollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy