Cargando…

Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Ureteral Stones: Evaluation of Patient and Stone Related Predictive Factors

PURPOSE: To evaluate the patient and stone related factors which may influence the final outcome of SWL in the management of ureteral stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 2011 and October 2013, a total of 204 adult patients undergoing SWL for single ureteral stone sizing 5 to 15 mm were in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yazici, Ozgur, Tuncer, Murat, Sahin, Cahit, Demirkol, Mehmet K., Kafkasli, Alper, Sarica, Kemal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26401859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0330
_version_ 1782416435935444992
author Yazici, Ozgur
Tuncer, Murat
Sahin, Cahit
Demirkol, Mehmet K.
Kafkasli, Alper
Sarica, Kemal
author_facet Yazici, Ozgur
Tuncer, Murat
Sahin, Cahit
Demirkol, Mehmet K.
Kafkasli, Alper
Sarica, Kemal
author_sort Yazici, Ozgur
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the patient and stone related factors which may influence the final outcome of SWL in the management of ureteral stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 2011 and October 2013, a total of 204 adult patients undergoing SWL for single ureteral stone sizing 5 to 15 mm were included into the study program. The impact of both patient (age, sex, BMI,) and stone related factors (laterality, location, longest diameter and density as CT HU) along with BUN and lastly SSD (skin to stone distance) on fragmentation were analysed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Stone free rates for proximal and distal ureteral stones were 68.8% and 72.7%, respectively with no statistically significant difference between two groups (p=0.7). According to univariate and multivariate analyses, while higher BMI (mean: 26.8 and 28.1, p=0.048) and stone density values (mean: 702 HU and 930 HU, p<0.0001) were detected as statistically significant independent predictors of treatment failure for proximal ureteral stones, the only statistically significant predicting parameter for the success rates of SWL in distal ureteral stones was the higher SSD value (median: 114 and 90, p=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings have clearly shown that while higher BMI and increased stone attenuation values detected by NCCT were significant factors influencing the final outcome of SWL treatment in proximal ureteral stones; opposite to the literature, high SSD was the only independent predictor of success for the SWL treatment of distal ureteral stones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4756995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47569952016-05-09 Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Ureteral Stones: Evaluation of Patient and Stone Related Predictive Factors Yazici, Ozgur Tuncer, Murat Sahin, Cahit Demirkol, Mehmet K. Kafkasli, Alper Sarica, Kemal Int Braz J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the patient and stone related factors which may influence the final outcome of SWL in the management of ureteral stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 2011 and October 2013, a total of 204 adult patients undergoing SWL for single ureteral stone sizing 5 to 15 mm were included into the study program. The impact of both patient (age, sex, BMI,) and stone related factors (laterality, location, longest diameter and density as CT HU) along with BUN and lastly SSD (skin to stone distance) on fragmentation were analysed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Stone free rates for proximal and distal ureteral stones were 68.8% and 72.7%, respectively with no statistically significant difference between two groups (p=0.7). According to univariate and multivariate analyses, while higher BMI (mean: 26.8 and 28.1, p=0.048) and stone density values (mean: 702 HU and 930 HU, p<0.0001) were detected as statistically significant independent predictors of treatment failure for proximal ureteral stones, the only statistically significant predicting parameter for the success rates of SWL in distal ureteral stones was the higher SSD value (median: 114 and 90, p=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings have clearly shown that while higher BMI and increased stone attenuation values detected by NCCT were significant factors influencing the final outcome of SWL treatment in proximal ureteral stones; opposite to the literature, high SSD was the only independent predictor of success for the SWL treatment of distal ureteral stones. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4756995/ /pubmed/26401859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0330 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yazici, Ozgur
Tuncer, Murat
Sahin, Cahit
Demirkol, Mehmet K.
Kafkasli, Alper
Sarica, Kemal
Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Ureteral Stones: Evaluation of Patient and Stone Related Predictive Factors
title Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Ureteral Stones: Evaluation of Patient and Stone Related Predictive Factors
title_full Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Ureteral Stones: Evaluation of Patient and Stone Related Predictive Factors
title_fullStr Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Ureteral Stones: Evaluation of Patient and Stone Related Predictive Factors
title_full_unstemmed Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Ureteral Stones: Evaluation of Patient and Stone Related Predictive Factors
title_short Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Ureteral Stones: Evaluation of Patient and Stone Related Predictive Factors
title_sort shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stones: evaluation of patient and stone related predictive factors
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26401859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0330
work_keys_str_mv AT yaziciozgur shockwavelithotripsyinureteralstonesevaluationofpatientandstonerelatedpredictivefactors
AT tuncermurat shockwavelithotripsyinureteralstonesevaluationofpatientandstonerelatedpredictivefactors
AT sahincahit shockwavelithotripsyinureteralstonesevaluationofpatientandstonerelatedpredictivefactors
AT demirkolmehmetk shockwavelithotripsyinureteralstonesevaluationofpatientandstonerelatedpredictivefactors
AT kafkaslialper shockwavelithotripsyinureteralstonesevaluationofpatientandstonerelatedpredictivefactors
AT saricakemal shockwavelithotripsyinureteralstonesevaluationofpatientandstonerelatedpredictivefactors