Cargando…

Water, Water, Everywhere: Defining and Assessing Data Sharing in Academia

Sharing of research data has begun to gain traction in many areas of the sciences in the past few years because of changing expectations from the scientific community, funding agencies, and academic journals. National Science Foundation (NSF) requirements for a data management plan (DMP) went into e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Tuyl, Steven, Whitmire, Amanda L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4757565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26886581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147942
_version_ 1782416470928523264
author Van Tuyl, Steven
Whitmire, Amanda L.
author_facet Van Tuyl, Steven
Whitmire, Amanda L.
author_sort Van Tuyl, Steven
collection PubMed
description Sharing of research data has begun to gain traction in many areas of the sciences in the past few years because of changing expectations from the scientific community, funding agencies, and academic journals. National Science Foundation (NSF) requirements for a data management plan (DMP) went into effect in 2011, with the intent of facilitating the dissemination and sharing of research results. Many projects that were funded during 2011 and 2012 should now have implemented the elements of the data management plans required for their grant proposals. In this paper we define ‘data sharing’ and present a protocol for assessing whether data have been shared and how effective the sharing was. We then evaluate the data sharing practices of researchers funded by the NSF at Oregon State University in two ways: by attempting to discover project-level research data using the associated DMP as a starting point, and by examining data sharing associated with journal articles that acknowledge NSF support. Sharing at both the project level and the journal article level was not carried out in the majority of cases, and when sharing was accomplished, the shared data were often of questionable usability due to access, documentation, and formatting issues. We close the article by offering recommendations for how data producers, journal publishers, data repositories, and funding agencies can facilitate the process of sharing data in a meaningful way.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4757565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47575652016-02-26 Water, Water, Everywhere: Defining and Assessing Data Sharing in Academia Van Tuyl, Steven Whitmire, Amanda L. PLoS One Research Article Sharing of research data has begun to gain traction in many areas of the sciences in the past few years because of changing expectations from the scientific community, funding agencies, and academic journals. National Science Foundation (NSF) requirements for a data management plan (DMP) went into effect in 2011, with the intent of facilitating the dissemination and sharing of research results. Many projects that were funded during 2011 and 2012 should now have implemented the elements of the data management plans required for their grant proposals. In this paper we define ‘data sharing’ and present a protocol for assessing whether data have been shared and how effective the sharing was. We then evaluate the data sharing practices of researchers funded by the NSF at Oregon State University in two ways: by attempting to discover project-level research data using the associated DMP as a starting point, and by examining data sharing associated with journal articles that acknowledge NSF support. Sharing at both the project level and the journal article level was not carried out in the majority of cases, and when sharing was accomplished, the shared data were often of questionable usability due to access, documentation, and formatting issues. We close the article by offering recommendations for how data producers, journal publishers, data repositories, and funding agencies can facilitate the process of sharing data in a meaningful way. Public Library of Science 2016-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4757565/ /pubmed/26886581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147942 Text en © 2016 Van Tuyl, Whitmire http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Van Tuyl, Steven
Whitmire, Amanda L.
Water, Water, Everywhere: Defining and Assessing Data Sharing in Academia
title Water, Water, Everywhere: Defining and Assessing Data Sharing in Academia
title_full Water, Water, Everywhere: Defining and Assessing Data Sharing in Academia
title_fullStr Water, Water, Everywhere: Defining and Assessing Data Sharing in Academia
title_full_unstemmed Water, Water, Everywhere: Defining and Assessing Data Sharing in Academia
title_short Water, Water, Everywhere: Defining and Assessing Data Sharing in Academia
title_sort water, water, everywhere: defining and assessing data sharing in academia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4757565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26886581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147942
work_keys_str_mv AT vantuylsteven waterwatereverywheredefiningandassessingdatasharinginacademia
AT whitmireamandal waterwatereverywheredefiningandassessingdatasharinginacademia