Cargando…
Water, Water, Everywhere: Defining and Assessing Data Sharing in Academia
Sharing of research data has begun to gain traction in many areas of the sciences in the past few years because of changing expectations from the scientific community, funding agencies, and academic journals. National Science Foundation (NSF) requirements for a data management plan (DMP) went into e...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4757565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26886581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147942 |
_version_ | 1782416470928523264 |
---|---|
author | Van Tuyl, Steven Whitmire, Amanda L. |
author_facet | Van Tuyl, Steven Whitmire, Amanda L. |
author_sort | Van Tuyl, Steven |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sharing of research data has begun to gain traction in many areas of the sciences in the past few years because of changing expectations from the scientific community, funding agencies, and academic journals. National Science Foundation (NSF) requirements for a data management plan (DMP) went into effect in 2011, with the intent of facilitating the dissemination and sharing of research results. Many projects that were funded during 2011 and 2012 should now have implemented the elements of the data management plans required for their grant proposals. In this paper we define ‘data sharing’ and present a protocol for assessing whether data have been shared and how effective the sharing was. We then evaluate the data sharing practices of researchers funded by the NSF at Oregon State University in two ways: by attempting to discover project-level research data using the associated DMP as a starting point, and by examining data sharing associated with journal articles that acknowledge NSF support. Sharing at both the project level and the journal article level was not carried out in the majority of cases, and when sharing was accomplished, the shared data were often of questionable usability due to access, documentation, and formatting issues. We close the article by offering recommendations for how data producers, journal publishers, data repositories, and funding agencies can facilitate the process of sharing data in a meaningful way. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4757565 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47575652016-02-26 Water, Water, Everywhere: Defining and Assessing Data Sharing in Academia Van Tuyl, Steven Whitmire, Amanda L. PLoS One Research Article Sharing of research data has begun to gain traction in many areas of the sciences in the past few years because of changing expectations from the scientific community, funding agencies, and academic journals. National Science Foundation (NSF) requirements for a data management plan (DMP) went into effect in 2011, with the intent of facilitating the dissemination and sharing of research results. Many projects that were funded during 2011 and 2012 should now have implemented the elements of the data management plans required for their grant proposals. In this paper we define ‘data sharing’ and present a protocol for assessing whether data have been shared and how effective the sharing was. We then evaluate the data sharing practices of researchers funded by the NSF at Oregon State University in two ways: by attempting to discover project-level research data using the associated DMP as a starting point, and by examining data sharing associated with journal articles that acknowledge NSF support. Sharing at both the project level and the journal article level was not carried out in the majority of cases, and when sharing was accomplished, the shared data were often of questionable usability due to access, documentation, and formatting issues. We close the article by offering recommendations for how data producers, journal publishers, data repositories, and funding agencies can facilitate the process of sharing data in a meaningful way. Public Library of Science 2016-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4757565/ /pubmed/26886581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147942 Text en © 2016 Van Tuyl, Whitmire http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Van Tuyl, Steven Whitmire, Amanda L. Water, Water, Everywhere: Defining and Assessing Data Sharing in Academia |
title | Water, Water, Everywhere: Defining and Assessing Data Sharing in Academia |
title_full | Water, Water, Everywhere: Defining and Assessing Data Sharing in Academia |
title_fullStr | Water, Water, Everywhere: Defining and Assessing Data Sharing in Academia |
title_full_unstemmed | Water, Water, Everywhere: Defining and Assessing Data Sharing in Academia |
title_short | Water, Water, Everywhere: Defining and Assessing Data Sharing in Academia |
title_sort | water, water, everywhere: defining and assessing data sharing in academia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4757565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26886581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147942 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vantuylsteven waterwatereverywheredefiningandassessingdatasharinginacademia AT whitmireamandal waterwatereverywheredefiningandassessingdatasharinginacademia |