Cargando…

Contact forces during hybrid atrial fibrillation ablation: an in vitro evaluation

PURPOSE: Data on epicardial contact force efficacy in dual epicardial–endocardial atrial fibrillation ablation procedures are lacking. We present an in vitro study on the importance of epicardial and endocardial contact forces during this procedure. METHODS: The in vitro setup consists of two separa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lozekoot, Pieter W. J., de Jong, Monique M. J., Gelsomino, Sandro, Parise, Orlando, Matteucci, Francesco, Lucà, Fabiana, Kumar, N., Nijs, Jan, Czapla, Jens, Kwant, Paul, Bani, Daniele, Gensini, Gian Franco, Pison, Laurent, Crijns, Harry J. G. M., Maessen, Jos G., La Meir, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4757611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26728030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-015-0089-y
_version_ 1782416478319935488
author Lozekoot, Pieter W. J.
de Jong, Monique M. J.
Gelsomino, Sandro
Parise, Orlando
Matteucci, Francesco
Lucà, Fabiana
Kumar, N.
Nijs, Jan
Czapla, Jens
Kwant, Paul
Bani, Daniele
Gensini, Gian Franco
Pison, Laurent
Crijns, Harry J. G. M.
Maessen, Jos G.
La Meir, Mark
author_facet Lozekoot, Pieter W. J.
de Jong, Monique M. J.
Gelsomino, Sandro
Parise, Orlando
Matteucci, Francesco
Lucà, Fabiana
Kumar, N.
Nijs, Jan
Czapla, Jens
Kwant, Paul
Bani, Daniele
Gensini, Gian Franco
Pison, Laurent
Crijns, Harry J. G. M.
Maessen, Jos G.
La Meir, Mark
author_sort Lozekoot, Pieter W. J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Data on epicardial contact force efficacy in dual epicardial–endocardial atrial fibrillation ablation procedures are lacking. We present an in vitro study on the importance of epicardial and endocardial contact forces during this procedure. METHODS: The in vitro setup consists of two separate chambers, mimicking the endocardial and epicardial sides of the heart. A circuit, including a pump and a heat exchanger, circulates porcine blood through the endocardial chamber. A septum, with a cut out, allows the placement of a magnetically fixed tissue holder, securing porcine atrial tissue, in the middle of both chambers. Two trocars provide access to the epicardium and endocardium. Force transducers mounted on both catheter holders allow real-time contact force monitoring, while a railing system allows controlled contact force adjustment. We histologically assessed different combinations of epi-endocardial radiofrequency ablation contact forces using porcine atria, evaluating the ablation’s diameters, area, and volume. RESULTS: An epicardial ablation with forces of 100 or 300 g, followed by an endocardial ablation with a force of 20 g did not achieve transmurality. Increasing endocardial forces to 30 and 40 g combined with an epicardial force ranging from 100 to 300 and 500 g led to transmurality with significant increases in lesion’s diameters, area, and volumes. CONCLUSIONS: Increased endocardial contact forces led to larger ablation lesions regardless of standard epicardial pressure forces. In order to gain transmurality in a model of a combined epicardial–endocardial procedure, a minimal endocardial force of 30 g combined with an epicardial force of 100 g is necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4757611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47576112016-02-26 Contact forces during hybrid atrial fibrillation ablation: an in vitro evaluation Lozekoot, Pieter W. J. de Jong, Monique M. J. Gelsomino, Sandro Parise, Orlando Matteucci, Francesco Lucà, Fabiana Kumar, N. Nijs, Jan Czapla, Jens Kwant, Paul Bani, Daniele Gensini, Gian Franco Pison, Laurent Crijns, Harry J. G. M. Maessen, Jos G. La Meir, Mark J Interv Card Electrophysiol Article PURPOSE: Data on epicardial contact force efficacy in dual epicardial–endocardial atrial fibrillation ablation procedures are lacking. We present an in vitro study on the importance of epicardial and endocardial contact forces during this procedure. METHODS: The in vitro setup consists of two separate chambers, mimicking the endocardial and epicardial sides of the heart. A circuit, including a pump and a heat exchanger, circulates porcine blood through the endocardial chamber. A septum, with a cut out, allows the placement of a magnetically fixed tissue holder, securing porcine atrial tissue, in the middle of both chambers. Two trocars provide access to the epicardium and endocardium. Force transducers mounted on both catheter holders allow real-time contact force monitoring, while a railing system allows controlled contact force adjustment. We histologically assessed different combinations of epi-endocardial radiofrequency ablation contact forces using porcine atria, evaluating the ablation’s diameters, area, and volume. RESULTS: An epicardial ablation with forces of 100 or 300 g, followed by an endocardial ablation with a force of 20 g did not achieve transmurality. Increasing endocardial forces to 30 and 40 g combined with an epicardial force ranging from 100 to 300 and 500 g led to transmurality with significant increases in lesion’s diameters, area, and volumes. CONCLUSIONS: Increased endocardial contact forces led to larger ablation lesions regardless of standard epicardial pressure forces. In order to gain transmurality in a model of a combined epicardial–endocardial procedure, a minimal endocardial force of 30 g combined with an epicardial force of 100 g is necessary. Springer US 2016-01-04 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4757611/ /pubmed/26728030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-015-0089-y Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Lozekoot, Pieter W. J.
de Jong, Monique M. J.
Gelsomino, Sandro
Parise, Orlando
Matteucci, Francesco
Lucà, Fabiana
Kumar, N.
Nijs, Jan
Czapla, Jens
Kwant, Paul
Bani, Daniele
Gensini, Gian Franco
Pison, Laurent
Crijns, Harry J. G. M.
Maessen, Jos G.
La Meir, Mark
Contact forces during hybrid atrial fibrillation ablation: an in vitro evaluation
title Contact forces during hybrid atrial fibrillation ablation: an in vitro evaluation
title_full Contact forces during hybrid atrial fibrillation ablation: an in vitro evaluation
title_fullStr Contact forces during hybrid atrial fibrillation ablation: an in vitro evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Contact forces during hybrid atrial fibrillation ablation: an in vitro evaluation
title_short Contact forces during hybrid atrial fibrillation ablation: an in vitro evaluation
title_sort contact forces during hybrid atrial fibrillation ablation: an in vitro evaluation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4757611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26728030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-015-0089-y
work_keys_str_mv AT lozekootpieterwj contactforcesduringhybridatrialfibrillationablationaninvitroevaluation
AT dejongmoniquemj contactforcesduringhybridatrialfibrillationablationaninvitroevaluation
AT gelsominosandro contactforcesduringhybridatrialfibrillationablationaninvitroevaluation
AT pariseorlando contactforcesduringhybridatrialfibrillationablationaninvitroevaluation
AT matteuccifrancesco contactforcesduringhybridatrialfibrillationablationaninvitroevaluation
AT lucafabiana contactforcesduringhybridatrialfibrillationablationaninvitroevaluation
AT kumarn contactforcesduringhybridatrialfibrillationablationaninvitroevaluation
AT nijsjan contactforcesduringhybridatrialfibrillationablationaninvitroevaluation
AT czaplajens contactforcesduringhybridatrialfibrillationablationaninvitroevaluation
AT kwantpaul contactforcesduringhybridatrialfibrillationablationaninvitroevaluation
AT banidaniele contactforcesduringhybridatrialfibrillationablationaninvitroevaluation
AT gensinigianfranco contactforcesduringhybridatrialfibrillationablationaninvitroevaluation
AT pisonlaurent contactforcesduringhybridatrialfibrillationablationaninvitroevaluation
AT crijnsharryjgm contactforcesduringhybridatrialfibrillationablationaninvitroevaluation
AT maessenjosg contactforcesduringhybridatrialfibrillationablationaninvitroevaluation
AT lameirmark contactforcesduringhybridatrialfibrillationablationaninvitroevaluation