Cargando…
Endoscopic repair of primary versus recurrent male unilateral inguinal hernias: Are there differences in the outcome?
INTRODUCTION: To date, there are no prospective randomized studies that compare the outcome of endoscopic repair of primary versus recurrent inguinal hernias. It is therefore now attempted to answer that key question on the basis of registry data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 20,624 patients were...
Autores principales: | Köckerling, F., Jacob, D., Wiegank, W., Hukauf, M., Schug-Pass, C., Kuthe, A., Bittner, R. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4757618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26139485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4318-3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
TEP versus Lichtenstein: Which technique is better for the repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernias in men?
por: Köckerling, F., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Does surgeon volume matter in the outcome of endoscopic inguinal hernia repair?
por: Köckerling, F., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Laparo-endoscopic versus open recurrent inguinal hernia repair: should we follow the guidelines?
por: Köckerling, F., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
TEP or TAPP for recurrent inguinal hernia repair—register-based comparison of the outcome
por: Köckerling, F., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Open Repair of Primary Versus Recurrent Male Unilateral Inguinal Hernias: Perioperative Complications and 1-Year Follow-up
por: Köckerling, F., et al.
Publicado: (2015)