Cargando…

Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science?

Examines scientometrically the trends in and the recent situation of research on and the teaching of the history of psychology in the German-speaking countries and compares the findings with the situation in other countries (mainly the United States) by means of the psychology databases PSYNDEX and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Krampen, Günter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4757634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26924864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1834-4
_version_ 1782416483192668160
author Krampen, Günter
author_facet Krampen, Günter
author_sort Krampen, Günter
collection PubMed
description Examines scientometrically the trends in and the recent situation of research on and the teaching of the history of psychology in the German-speaking countries and compares the findings with the situation in other countries (mainly the United States) by means of the psychology databases PSYNDEX and PsycINFO. Declines of publications on the history of psychology are described scientometrically for both research communities since the 1990s. Some impulses are suggested for the future of research on and the teaching of the history of psychology. These include (1) the necessity and significance of an intensified use of quantitative, unobtrusive scientometric methods in historiography in times of digital “big data”, (2) the necessity and possibilities to integrate qualitative and quantitative methodologies in historical research and teaching, (3) the reasonableness of interdisciplinary cooperation of specialist historians, scientometricians, and psychologists, (4) the meaningfulness and necessity to explore, investigate, and teach more intensively the past and the problem history of psychology as well as the understanding of the subject matter of psychology in its historical development in cultural contexts. The outlook on the future of such a more up-to-date research on and teaching of the history of psychology is—with some caution—positive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4757634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47576342016-02-26 Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science? Krampen, Günter Scientometrics Article Examines scientometrically the trends in and the recent situation of research on and the teaching of the history of psychology in the German-speaking countries and compares the findings with the situation in other countries (mainly the United States) by means of the psychology databases PSYNDEX and PsycINFO. Declines of publications on the history of psychology are described scientometrically for both research communities since the 1990s. Some impulses are suggested for the future of research on and the teaching of the history of psychology. These include (1) the necessity and significance of an intensified use of quantitative, unobtrusive scientometric methods in historiography in times of digital “big data”, (2) the necessity and possibilities to integrate qualitative and quantitative methodologies in historical research and teaching, (3) the reasonableness of interdisciplinary cooperation of specialist historians, scientometricians, and psychologists, (4) the meaningfulness and necessity to explore, investigate, and teach more intensively the past and the problem history of psychology as well as the understanding of the subject matter of psychology in its historical development in cultural contexts. The outlook on the future of such a more up-to-date research on and teaching of the history of psychology is—with some caution—positive. Springer Netherlands 2016-01-11 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4757634/ /pubmed/26924864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1834-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Krampen, Günter
Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science?
title Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science?
title_full Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science?
title_fullStr Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science?
title_full_unstemmed Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science?
title_short Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science?
title_sort scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: is psychology becoming an unhistorical science?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4757634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26924864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1834-4
work_keys_str_mv AT krampengunter scientometrictrendanalysesofpublicationsonthehistoryofpsychologyispsychologybecominganunhistoricalscience