Cargando…
Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science?
Examines scientometrically the trends in and the recent situation of research on and the teaching of the history of psychology in the German-speaking countries and compares the findings with the situation in other countries (mainly the United States) by means of the psychology databases PSYNDEX and...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4757634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26924864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1834-4 |
_version_ | 1782416483192668160 |
---|---|
author | Krampen, Günter |
author_facet | Krampen, Günter |
author_sort | Krampen, Günter |
collection | PubMed |
description | Examines scientometrically the trends in and the recent situation of research on and the teaching of the history of psychology in the German-speaking countries and compares the findings with the situation in other countries (mainly the United States) by means of the psychology databases PSYNDEX and PsycINFO. Declines of publications on the history of psychology are described scientometrically for both research communities since the 1990s. Some impulses are suggested for the future of research on and the teaching of the history of psychology. These include (1) the necessity and significance of an intensified use of quantitative, unobtrusive scientometric methods in historiography in times of digital “big data”, (2) the necessity and possibilities to integrate qualitative and quantitative methodologies in historical research and teaching, (3) the reasonableness of interdisciplinary cooperation of specialist historians, scientometricians, and psychologists, (4) the meaningfulness and necessity to explore, investigate, and teach more intensively the past and the problem history of psychology as well as the understanding of the subject matter of psychology in its historical development in cultural contexts. The outlook on the future of such a more up-to-date research on and teaching of the history of psychology is—with some caution—positive. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4757634 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47576342016-02-26 Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science? Krampen, Günter Scientometrics Article Examines scientometrically the trends in and the recent situation of research on and the teaching of the history of psychology in the German-speaking countries and compares the findings with the situation in other countries (mainly the United States) by means of the psychology databases PSYNDEX and PsycINFO. Declines of publications on the history of psychology are described scientometrically for both research communities since the 1990s. Some impulses are suggested for the future of research on and the teaching of the history of psychology. These include (1) the necessity and significance of an intensified use of quantitative, unobtrusive scientometric methods in historiography in times of digital “big data”, (2) the necessity and possibilities to integrate qualitative and quantitative methodologies in historical research and teaching, (3) the reasonableness of interdisciplinary cooperation of specialist historians, scientometricians, and psychologists, (4) the meaningfulness and necessity to explore, investigate, and teach more intensively the past and the problem history of psychology as well as the understanding of the subject matter of psychology in its historical development in cultural contexts. The outlook on the future of such a more up-to-date research on and teaching of the history of psychology is—with some caution—positive. Springer Netherlands 2016-01-11 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4757634/ /pubmed/26924864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1834-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Krampen, Günter Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science? |
title | Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science? |
title_full | Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science? |
title_fullStr | Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science? |
title_full_unstemmed | Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science? |
title_short | Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science? |
title_sort | scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: is psychology becoming an unhistorical science? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4757634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26924864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1834-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krampengunter scientometrictrendanalysesofpublicationsonthehistoryofpsychologyispsychologybecominganunhistoricalscience |