Cargando…

The Role of Mean Platelet Volume as a Predictor of Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background. An increase in the mean platelet volume (MPV) has been proposed as a novel prognostic indicator in critically ill patients. Objective. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether there is an association between MPV and mortality in critically ill patients. Met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tajarernmuang, Pattraporn, Phrommintikul, Arintaya, Limsukon, Atikun, Pothirat, Chaicharn, Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4757676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26966574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4370834
_version_ 1782416487888191488
author Tajarernmuang, Pattraporn
Phrommintikul, Arintaya
Limsukon, Atikun
Pothirat, Chaicharn
Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak
author_facet Tajarernmuang, Pattraporn
Phrommintikul, Arintaya
Limsukon, Atikun
Pothirat, Chaicharn
Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak
author_sort Tajarernmuang, Pattraporn
collection PubMed
description Background. An increase in the mean platelet volume (MPV) has been proposed as a novel prognostic indicator in critically ill patients. Objective. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether there is an association between MPV and mortality in critically ill patients. Methods. We did electronic search in Medline, Scopus, and Embase up to November 2015. Results. Eleven observational studies, involving 3724 patients, were included. The values of initial MPV in nonsurvivors and survivors were not different, with the mean difference with 95% confident interval (95% CI) being 0.17 (95% CI: −0.04, 0.38; p = 0.112). However, after small sample studies were excluded in sensitivity analysis, the pooling mean difference of MPV was 0.32 (95% CI: 0.04, 0.60; p = 0.03). In addition, the MPV was observed to be significantly higher in nonsurvivor groups after the third day of admission. On the subgroup analysis, although patient types (sepsis or mixed ICU) and study type (prospective or retrospective study) did not show any significant difference between groups, the difference of MPV was significantly difference on the unit which had mortality up to 30%. Conclusions. Initial values of MPV might not be used as a prognostic marker of mortality in critically ill patients. Subsequent values of MPV after the 3rd day and the lower mortality rate unit might be useful. However, the heterogeneity between studies is high.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4757676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47576762016-03-10 The Role of Mean Platelet Volume as a Predictor of Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Tajarernmuang, Pattraporn Phrommintikul, Arintaya Limsukon, Atikun Pothirat, Chaicharn Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak Crit Care Res Pract Review Article Background. An increase in the mean platelet volume (MPV) has been proposed as a novel prognostic indicator in critically ill patients. Objective. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether there is an association between MPV and mortality in critically ill patients. Methods. We did electronic search in Medline, Scopus, and Embase up to November 2015. Results. Eleven observational studies, involving 3724 patients, were included. The values of initial MPV in nonsurvivors and survivors were not different, with the mean difference with 95% confident interval (95% CI) being 0.17 (95% CI: −0.04, 0.38; p = 0.112). However, after small sample studies were excluded in sensitivity analysis, the pooling mean difference of MPV was 0.32 (95% CI: 0.04, 0.60; p = 0.03). In addition, the MPV was observed to be significantly higher in nonsurvivor groups after the third day of admission. On the subgroup analysis, although patient types (sepsis or mixed ICU) and study type (prospective or retrospective study) did not show any significant difference between groups, the difference of MPV was significantly difference on the unit which had mortality up to 30%. Conclusions. Initial values of MPV might not be used as a prognostic marker of mortality in critically ill patients. Subsequent values of MPV after the 3rd day and the lower mortality rate unit might be useful. However, the heterogeneity between studies is high. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4757676/ /pubmed/26966574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4370834 Text en Copyright © 2016 Pattraporn Tajarernmuang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Tajarernmuang, Pattraporn
Phrommintikul, Arintaya
Limsukon, Atikun
Pothirat, Chaicharn
Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak
The Role of Mean Platelet Volume as a Predictor of Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title The Role of Mean Platelet Volume as a Predictor of Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Role of Mean Platelet Volume as a Predictor of Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Role of Mean Platelet Volume as a Predictor of Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Mean Platelet Volume as a Predictor of Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Role of Mean Platelet Volume as a Predictor of Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort role of mean platelet volume as a predictor of mortality in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4757676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26966574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4370834
work_keys_str_mv AT tajarernmuangpattraporn theroleofmeanplateletvolumeasapredictorofmortalityincriticallyillpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT phrommintikularintaya theroleofmeanplateletvolumeasapredictorofmortalityincriticallyillpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT limsukonatikun theroleofmeanplateletvolumeasapredictorofmortalityincriticallyillpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pothiratchaicharn theroleofmeanplateletvolumeasapredictorofmortalityincriticallyillpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chittawatanaratkaweesak theroleofmeanplateletvolumeasapredictorofmortalityincriticallyillpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tajarernmuangpattraporn roleofmeanplateletvolumeasapredictorofmortalityincriticallyillpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT phrommintikularintaya roleofmeanplateletvolumeasapredictorofmortalityincriticallyillpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT limsukonatikun roleofmeanplateletvolumeasapredictorofmortalityincriticallyillpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pothiratchaicharn roleofmeanplateletvolumeasapredictorofmortalityincriticallyillpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chittawatanaratkaweesak roleofmeanplateletvolumeasapredictorofmortalityincriticallyillpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis