Cargando…
Translating a health service intervention into a rural setting: lessons learned
BACKGROUND: Limited research exists on the process of applying knowledge translation (KT) methodology to a rural-based population health intervention. METHODS: This study reports on the implementation and translational stages of a previously described Co-creating KT (Co-KT) framework in the rural to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4758176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26888017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1302-0 |
_version_ | 1782416574736498688 |
---|---|
author | Dent, Elsa Hoon, Elizabeth Kitson, Alison Karnon, Jonathan Newbury, Jonathan Harvey, Gillian Gill, Tiffany K. Gillis, Lauren Beilby, Justin |
author_facet | Dent, Elsa Hoon, Elizabeth Kitson, Alison Karnon, Jonathan Newbury, Jonathan Harvey, Gillian Gill, Tiffany K. Gillis, Lauren Beilby, Justin |
author_sort | Dent, Elsa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Limited research exists on the process of applying knowledge translation (KT) methodology to a rural-based population health intervention. METHODS: This study reports on the implementation and translational stages of a previously described Co-creating KT (Co-KT) framework in the rural town of Port Lincoln, South Australia (population: 14,000). The Co-KT framework involves five steps: (i) collecting local data; (ii) building stakeholder relationships; (iii) designing an evidence-based intervention incorporating local knowledge; (iv) implementation and evaluation of the intervention; and (v) translating the research into policy and practice. Barriers and enablers to the overall Co-KT implementation process were identified. Our intervention focused on musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. RESULTS: Although the Co-KT framework was valuable in engaging with the community, translating the final intervention into daily clinical practice was prevented by a lack of an accessible policy or financial framework to anchor the appropriate intervention, a lack of continued engagement with stakeholders, access problems to general practitioners (GPs) and Allied Health Professionals; and the paucity of referrals from GPs to Allied Health Professionals. Consequently, while many aspects of the intervention were successful, including the improvement of both function and pain in study participants, the full implementation of the Co-KT framework was not possible. DISCUSSION: This study implemented and evaluated a Co-KT framework for a population with MSK conditions, linking locally generated health care system knowledge with academic input. Further policy, health system changes, and on-the-ground support are needed to overcome the identified implementation challenges in order to create sustainable and effective system change. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4758176 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47581762016-02-19 Translating a health service intervention into a rural setting: lessons learned Dent, Elsa Hoon, Elizabeth Kitson, Alison Karnon, Jonathan Newbury, Jonathan Harvey, Gillian Gill, Tiffany K. Gillis, Lauren Beilby, Justin BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Limited research exists on the process of applying knowledge translation (KT) methodology to a rural-based population health intervention. METHODS: This study reports on the implementation and translational stages of a previously described Co-creating KT (Co-KT) framework in the rural town of Port Lincoln, South Australia (population: 14,000). The Co-KT framework involves five steps: (i) collecting local data; (ii) building stakeholder relationships; (iii) designing an evidence-based intervention incorporating local knowledge; (iv) implementation and evaluation of the intervention; and (v) translating the research into policy and practice. Barriers and enablers to the overall Co-KT implementation process were identified. Our intervention focused on musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. RESULTS: Although the Co-KT framework was valuable in engaging with the community, translating the final intervention into daily clinical practice was prevented by a lack of an accessible policy or financial framework to anchor the appropriate intervention, a lack of continued engagement with stakeholders, access problems to general practitioners (GPs) and Allied Health Professionals; and the paucity of referrals from GPs to Allied Health Professionals. Consequently, while many aspects of the intervention were successful, including the improvement of both function and pain in study participants, the full implementation of the Co-KT framework was not possible. DISCUSSION: This study implemented and evaluated a Co-KT framework for a population with MSK conditions, linking locally generated health care system knowledge with academic input. Further policy, health system changes, and on-the-ground support are needed to overcome the identified implementation challenges in order to create sustainable and effective system change. BioMed Central 2016-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4758176/ /pubmed/26888017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1302-0 Text en © Dent et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dent, Elsa Hoon, Elizabeth Kitson, Alison Karnon, Jonathan Newbury, Jonathan Harvey, Gillian Gill, Tiffany K. Gillis, Lauren Beilby, Justin Translating a health service intervention into a rural setting: lessons learned |
title | Translating a health service intervention into a rural setting: lessons learned |
title_full | Translating a health service intervention into a rural setting: lessons learned |
title_fullStr | Translating a health service intervention into a rural setting: lessons learned |
title_full_unstemmed | Translating a health service intervention into a rural setting: lessons learned |
title_short | Translating a health service intervention into a rural setting: lessons learned |
title_sort | translating a health service intervention into a rural setting: lessons learned |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4758176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26888017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1302-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dentelsa translatingahealthserviceinterventionintoaruralsettinglessonslearned AT hoonelizabeth translatingahealthserviceinterventionintoaruralsettinglessonslearned AT kitsonalison translatingahealthserviceinterventionintoaruralsettinglessonslearned AT karnonjonathan translatingahealthserviceinterventionintoaruralsettinglessonslearned AT newburyjonathan translatingahealthserviceinterventionintoaruralsettinglessonslearned AT harveygillian translatingahealthserviceinterventionintoaruralsettinglessonslearned AT gilltiffanyk translatingahealthserviceinterventionintoaruralsettinglessonslearned AT gillislauren translatingahealthserviceinterventionintoaruralsettinglessonslearned AT beilbyjustin translatingahealthserviceinterventionintoaruralsettinglessonslearned |