Cargando…

Translating a health service intervention into a rural setting: lessons learned

BACKGROUND: Limited research exists on the process of applying knowledge translation (KT) methodology to a rural-based population health intervention. METHODS: This study reports on the implementation and translational stages of a previously described Co-creating KT (Co-KT) framework in the rural to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dent, Elsa, Hoon, Elizabeth, Kitson, Alison, Karnon, Jonathan, Newbury, Jonathan, Harvey, Gillian, Gill, Tiffany K., Gillis, Lauren, Beilby, Justin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4758176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26888017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1302-0
_version_ 1782416574736498688
author Dent, Elsa
Hoon, Elizabeth
Kitson, Alison
Karnon, Jonathan
Newbury, Jonathan
Harvey, Gillian
Gill, Tiffany K.
Gillis, Lauren
Beilby, Justin
author_facet Dent, Elsa
Hoon, Elizabeth
Kitson, Alison
Karnon, Jonathan
Newbury, Jonathan
Harvey, Gillian
Gill, Tiffany K.
Gillis, Lauren
Beilby, Justin
author_sort Dent, Elsa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Limited research exists on the process of applying knowledge translation (KT) methodology to a rural-based population health intervention. METHODS: This study reports on the implementation and translational stages of a previously described Co-creating KT (Co-KT) framework in the rural town of Port Lincoln, South Australia (population: 14,000). The Co-KT framework involves five steps: (i) collecting local data; (ii) building stakeholder relationships; (iii) designing an evidence-based intervention incorporating local knowledge; (iv) implementation and evaluation of the intervention; and (v) translating the research into policy and practice. Barriers and enablers to the overall Co-KT implementation process were identified. Our intervention focused on musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. RESULTS: Although the Co-KT framework was valuable in engaging with the community, translating the final intervention into daily clinical practice was prevented by a lack of an accessible policy or financial framework to anchor the appropriate intervention, a lack of continued engagement with stakeholders, access problems to general practitioners (GPs) and Allied Health Professionals; and the paucity of referrals from GPs to Allied Health Professionals. Consequently, while many aspects of the intervention were successful, including the improvement of both function and pain in study participants, the full implementation of the Co-KT framework was not possible. DISCUSSION: This study implemented and evaluated a Co-KT framework for a population with MSK conditions, linking locally generated health care system knowledge with academic input. Further policy, health system changes, and on-the-ground support are needed to overcome the identified implementation challenges in order to create sustainable and effective system change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4758176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47581762016-02-19 Translating a health service intervention into a rural setting: lessons learned Dent, Elsa Hoon, Elizabeth Kitson, Alison Karnon, Jonathan Newbury, Jonathan Harvey, Gillian Gill, Tiffany K. Gillis, Lauren Beilby, Justin BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Limited research exists on the process of applying knowledge translation (KT) methodology to a rural-based population health intervention. METHODS: This study reports on the implementation and translational stages of a previously described Co-creating KT (Co-KT) framework in the rural town of Port Lincoln, South Australia (population: 14,000). The Co-KT framework involves five steps: (i) collecting local data; (ii) building stakeholder relationships; (iii) designing an evidence-based intervention incorporating local knowledge; (iv) implementation and evaluation of the intervention; and (v) translating the research into policy and practice. Barriers and enablers to the overall Co-KT implementation process were identified. Our intervention focused on musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. RESULTS: Although the Co-KT framework was valuable in engaging with the community, translating the final intervention into daily clinical practice was prevented by a lack of an accessible policy or financial framework to anchor the appropriate intervention, a lack of continued engagement with stakeholders, access problems to general practitioners (GPs) and Allied Health Professionals; and the paucity of referrals from GPs to Allied Health Professionals. Consequently, while many aspects of the intervention were successful, including the improvement of both function and pain in study participants, the full implementation of the Co-KT framework was not possible. DISCUSSION: This study implemented and evaluated a Co-KT framework for a population with MSK conditions, linking locally generated health care system knowledge with academic input. Further policy, health system changes, and on-the-ground support are needed to overcome the identified implementation challenges in order to create sustainable and effective system change. BioMed Central 2016-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4758176/ /pubmed/26888017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1302-0 Text en © Dent et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dent, Elsa
Hoon, Elizabeth
Kitson, Alison
Karnon, Jonathan
Newbury, Jonathan
Harvey, Gillian
Gill, Tiffany K.
Gillis, Lauren
Beilby, Justin
Translating a health service intervention into a rural setting: lessons learned
title Translating a health service intervention into a rural setting: lessons learned
title_full Translating a health service intervention into a rural setting: lessons learned
title_fullStr Translating a health service intervention into a rural setting: lessons learned
title_full_unstemmed Translating a health service intervention into a rural setting: lessons learned
title_short Translating a health service intervention into a rural setting: lessons learned
title_sort translating a health service intervention into a rural setting: lessons learned
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4758176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26888017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1302-0
work_keys_str_mv AT dentelsa translatingahealthserviceinterventionintoaruralsettinglessonslearned
AT hoonelizabeth translatingahealthserviceinterventionintoaruralsettinglessonslearned
AT kitsonalison translatingahealthserviceinterventionintoaruralsettinglessonslearned
AT karnonjonathan translatingahealthserviceinterventionintoaruralsettinglessonslearned
AT newburyjonathan translatingahealthserviceinterventionintoaruralsettinglessonslearned
AT harveygillian translatingahealthserviceinterventionintoaruralsettinglessonslearned
AT gilltiffanyk translatingahealthserviceinterventionintoaruralsettinglessonslearned
AT gillislauren translatingahealthserviceinterventionintoaruralsettinglessonslearned
AT beilbyjustin translatingahealthserviceinterventionintoaruralsettinglessonslearned