Cargando…

Primary Care Clinics and Accountable Care Organizations

BACKGROUND: The Accountable Care Organization (ACO) is one of the new models of health care delivery in the United States. To date, little is known about the characteristics of health care organizations that have joined ACOs. We report on the findings of a survey of primary care clinics, the objecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ortiz, Judith, Tang, Chiung-Ya, Lin, Yi-Ling, Masri, Maysoun D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4758220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26900587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333392815613056
_version_ 1782416577449164800
author Ortiz, Judith
Tang, Chiung-Ya
Lin, Yi-Ling
Masri, Maysoun D.
author_facet Ortiz, Judith
Tang, Chiung-Ya
Lin, Yi-Ling
Masri, Maysoun D.
author_sort Ortiz, Judith
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Accountable Care Organization (ACO) is one of the new models of health care delivery in the United States. To date, little is known about the characteristics of health care organizations that have joined ACOs. We report on the findings of a survey of primary care clinics, the objective of which was to investigate the opinions of clinic management about participation in ACOs and the characteristics of clinic organizational structure that may contribute to joining ACOs or be willing to do so. METHODS: A 27-item survey questionnaire was developed and distributed by mail in 3 annual waves to all Rural Health Clinics (RHCs) in 9 states. Two dependent variables—participation in ACOs and willingness to join ACOs—were created and analyzed using a generalized estimating equation approach. RESULTS: A total of 257 RHCs responded to the survey. A small percentage (5.2%) of the respondent clinics reported that they were participating in ACOs. Rural Health Clinics in isolated areas were 78% less likely to be in ACOs (odds ratio = 0.22, P = .059). Nonprofit RHCs indicated a higher willingness to join an ACO than for-profit RHCs (B = 1.271, P = .054). There is a positive relationship between RHC size and willingness to join an ACO (B = 0.402, P = .010). CONCLUSION: At this early stage of ACO development, many RHC personnel are unfamiliar with the ACO model. Rural providers’ limited technological and human resources, and the lack of ACO development in rural areas, may delay or prevent their participation in ACOs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4758220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47582202016-02-18 Primary Care Clinics and Accountable Care Organizations Ortiz, Judith Tang, Chiung-Ya Lin, Yi-Ling Masri, Maysoun D. Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol Article BACKGROUND: The Accountable Care Organization (ACO) is one of the new models of health care delivery in the United States. To date, little is known about the characteristics of health care organizations that have joined ACOs. We report on the findings of a survey of primary care clinics, the objective of which was to investigate the opinions of clinic management about participation in ACOs and the characteristics of clinic organizational structure that may contribute to joining ACOs or be willing to do so. METHODS: A 27-item survey questionnaire was developed and distributed by mail in 3 annual waves to all Rural Health Clinics (RHCs) in 9 states. Two dependent variables—participation in ACOs and willingness to join ACOs—were created and analyzed using a generalized estimating equation approach. RESULTS: A total of 257 RHCs responded to the survey. A small percentage (5.2%) of the respondent clinics reported that they were participating in ACOs. Rural Health Clinics in isolated areas were 78% less likely to be in ACOs (odds ratio = 0.22, P = .059). Nonprofit RHCs indicated a higher willingness to join an ACO than for-profit RHCs (B = 1.271, P = .054). There is a positive relationship between RHC size and willingness to join an ACO (B = 0.402, P = .010). CONCLUSION: At this early stage of ACO development, many RHC personnel are unfamiliar with the ACO model. Rural providers’ limited technological and human resources, and the lack of ACO development in rural areas, may delay or prevent their participation in ACOs. SAGE Publications 2015-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4758220/ /pubmed/26900587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333392815613056 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Ortiz, Judith
Tang, Chiung-Ya
Lin, Yi-Ling
Masri, Maysoun D.
Primary Care Clinics and Accountable Care Organizations
title Primary Care Clinics and Accountable Care Organizations
title_full Primary Care Clinics and Accountable Care Organizations
title_fullStr Primary Care Clinics and Accountable Care Organizations
title_full_unstemmed Primary Care Clinics and Accountable Care Organizations
title_short Primary Care Clinics and Accountable Care Organizations
title_sort primary care clinics and accountable care organizations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4758220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26900587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333392815613056
work_keys_str_mv AT ortizjudith primarycareclinicsandaccountablecareorganizations
AT tangchiungya primarycareclinicsandaccountablecareorganizations
AT linyiling primarycareclinicsandaccountablecareorganizations
AT masrimaysound primarycareclinicsandaccountablecareorganizations