Cargando…

Hydraulic fracturing water use variability in the United States and potential environmental implications

Until now, up‐to‐date, comprehensive, spatial, national‐scale data on hydraulic fracturing water volumes have been lacking. Water volumes used (injected) to hydraulically fracture over 263,859 oil and gas wells drilled between 2000 and 2014 were compiled and used to create the first U.S. map of hydr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gallegos, Tanya J., Varela, Brian A., Haines, Seth S., Engle, Mark A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4758395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26937056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017278
_version_ 1782416601129156608
author Gallegos, Tanya J.
Varela, Brian A.
Haines, Seth S.
Engle, Mark A.
author_facet Gallegos, Tanya J.
Varela, Brian A.
Haines, Seth S.
Engle, Mark A.
author_sort Gallegos, Tanya J.
collection PubMed
description Until now, up‐to‐date, comprehensive, spatial, national‐scale data on hydraulic fracturing water volumes have been lacking. Water volumes used (injected) to hydraulically fracture over 263,859 oil and gas wells drilled between 2000 and 2014 were compiled and used to create the first U.S. map of hydraulic fracturing water use. Although median annual volumes of 15,275 m(3) and 19,425 m(3) of water per well was used to hydraulically fracture individual horizontal oil and gas wells, respectively, in 2014, about 42% of wells were actually either vertical or directional, which required less than 2600 m(3) water per well. The highest average hydraulic fracturing water usage (10,000−36,620 m(3) per well) in watersheds across the United States generally correlated with shale‐gas areas (versus coalbed methane, tight oil, or tight gas) where the greatest proportion of hydraulically fractured wells were horizontally drilled, reflecting that the natural reservoir properties influence water use. This analysis also demonstrates that many oil and gas resources within a given basin are developed using a mix of horizontal, vertical, and some directional wells, explaining why large volume hydraulic fracturing water usage is not widespread. This spatial variability in hydraulic fracturing water use relates to the potential for environmental impacts such as water availability, water quality, wastewater disposal, and possible wastewater injection‐induced earthquakes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4758395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47583952016-02-29 Hydraulic fracturing water use variability in the United States and potential environmental implications Gallegos, Tanya J. Varela, Brian A. Haines, Seth S. Engle, Mark A. Water Resour Res Technical Reports: Data Until now, up‐to‐date, comprehensive, spatial, national‐scale data on hydraulic fracturing water volumes have been lacking. Water volumes used (injected) to hydraulically fracture over 263,859 oil and gas wells drilled between 2000 and 2014 were compiled and used to create the first U.S. map of hydraulic fracturing water use. Although median annual volumes of 15,275 m(3) and 19,425 m(3) of water per well was used to hydraulically fracture individual horizontal oil and gas wells, respectively, in 2014, about 42% of wells were actually either vertical or directional, which required less than 2600 m(3) water per well. The highest average hydraulic fracturing water usage (10,000−36,620 m(3) per well) in watersheds across the United States generally correlated with shale‐gas areas (versus coalbed methane, tight oil, or tight gas) where the greatest proportion of hydraulically fractured wells were horizontally drilled, reflecting that the natural reservoir properties influence water use. This analysis also demonstrates that many oil and gas resources within a given basin are developed using a mix of horizontal, vertical, and some directional wells, explaining why large volume hydraulic fracturing water usage is not widespread. This spatial variability in hydraulic fracturing water use relates to the potential for environmental impacts such as water availability, water quality, wastewater disposal, and possible wastewater injection‐induced earthquakes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-07-24 2015-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4758395/ /pubmed/26937056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017278 Text en © 2015. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Technical Reports: Data
Gallegos, Tanya J.
Varela, Brian A.
Haines, Seth S.
Engle, Mark A.
Hydraulic fracturing water use variability in the United States and potential environmental implications
title Hydraulic fracturing water use variability in the United States and potential environmental implications
title_full Hydraulic fracturing water use variability in the United States and potential environmental implications
title_fullStr Hydraulic fracturing water use variability in the United States and potential environmental implications
title_full_unstemmed Hydraulic fracturing water use variability in the United States and potential environmental implications
title_short Hydraulic fracturing water use variability in the United States and potential environmental implications
title_sort hydraulic fracturing water use variability in the united states and potential environmental implications
topic Technical Reports: Data
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4758395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26937056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017278
work_keys_str_mv AT gallegostanyaj hydraulicfracturingwaterusevariabilityintheunitedstatesandpotentialenvironmentalimplications
AT varelabriana hydraulicfracturingwaterusevariabilityintheunitedstatesandpotentialenvironmentalimplications
AT hainesseths hydraulicfracturingwaterusevariabilityintheunitedstatesandpotentialenvironmentalimplications
AT englemarka hydraulicfracturingwaterusevariabilityintheunitedstatesandpotentialenvironmentalimplications