Cargando…

A Feedback Model of Attention Explains the Diverse Effects of Attention on Neural Firing Rates and Receptive Field Structure

Visual attention has many effects on neural responses, producing complex changes in firing rates, as well as modifying the structure and size of receptive fields, both in topological and feature space. Several existing models of attention suggest that these effects arise from selective modulation of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miconi, Thomas, VanRullen, Rufin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4758641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26890584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004770
_version_ 1782416618046881792
author Miconi, Thomas
VanRullen, Rufin
author_facet Miconi, Thomas
VanRullen, Rufin
author_sort Miconi, Thomas
collection PubMed
description Visual attention has many effects on neural responses, producing complex changes in firing rates, as well as modifying the structure and size of receptive fields, both in topological and feature space. Several existing models of attention suggest that these effects arise from selective modulation of neural inputs. However, anatomical and physiological observations suggest that attentional modulation targets higher levels of the visual system (such as V4 or MT) rather than input areas (such as V1). Here we propose a simple mechanism that explains how a top-down attentional modulation, falling on higher visual areas, can produce the observed effects of attention on neural responses. Our model requires only the existence of modulatory feedback connections between areas, and short-range lateral inhibition within each area. Feedback connections redistribute the top-down modulation to lower areas, which in turn alters the inputs of other higher-area cells, including those that did not receive the initial modulation. This produces firing rate modulations and receptive field shifts. Simultaneously, short-range lateral inhibition between neighboring cells produce competitive effects that are automatically scaled to receptive field size in any given area. Our model reproduces the observed attentional effects on response rates (response gain, input gain, biased competition automatically scaled to receptive field size) and receptive field structure (shifts and resizing of receptive fields both spatially and in complex feature space), without modifying model parameters. Our model also makes the novel prediction that attentional effects on response curves should shift from response gain to contrast gain as the spatial focus of attention drifts away from the studied cell.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4758641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47586412016-02-26 A Feedback Model of Attention Explains the Diverse Effects of Attention on Neural Firing Rates and Receptive Field Structure Miconi, Thomas VanRullen, Rufin PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Visual attention has many effects on neural responses, producing complex changes in firing rates, as well as modifying the structure and size of receptive fields, both in topological and feature space. Several existing models of attention suggest that these effects arise from selective modulation of neural inputs. However, anatomical and physiological observations suggest that attentional modulation targets higher levels of the visual system (such as V4 or MT) rather than input areas (such as V1). Here we propose a simple mechanism that explains how a top-down attentional modulation, falling on higher visual areas, can produce the observed effects of attention on neural responses. Our model requires only the existence of modulatory feedback connections between areas, and short-range lateral inhibition within each area. Feedback connections redistribute the top-down modulation to lower areas, which in turn alters the inputs of other higher-area cells, including those that did not receive the initial modulation. This produces firing rate modulations and receptive field shifts. Simultaneously, short-range lateral inhibition between neighboring cells produce competitive effects that are automatically scaled to receptive field size in any given area. Our model reproduces the observed attentional effects on response rates (response gain, input gain, biased competition automatically scaled to receptive field size) and receptive field structure (shifts and resizing of receptive fields both spatially and in complex feature space), without modifying model parameters. Our model also makes the novel prediction that attentional effects on response curves should shift from response gain to contrast gain as the spatial focus of attention drifts away from the studied cell. Public Library of Science 2016-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4758641/ /pubmed/26890584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004770 Text en © 2016 Miconi, VanRullen http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Miconi, Thomas
VanRullen, Rufin
A Feedback Model of Attention Explains the Diverse Effects of Attention on Neural Firing Rates and Receptive Field Structure
title A Feedback Model of Attention Explains the Diverse Effects of Attention on Neural Firing Rates and Receptive Field Structure
title_full A Feedback Model of Attention Explains the Diverse Effects of Attention on Neural Firing Rates and Receptive Field Structure
title_fullStr A Feedback Model of Attention Explains the Diverse Effects of Attention on Neural Firing Rates and Receptive Field Structure
title_full_unstemmed A Feedback Model of Attention Explains the Diverse Effects of Attention on Neural Firing Rates and Receptive Field Structure
title_short A Feedback Model of Attention Explains the Diverse Effects of Attention on Neural Firing Rates and Receptive Field Structure
title_sort feedback model of attention explains the diverse effects of attention on neural firing rates and receptive field structure
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4758641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26890584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004770
work_keys_str_mv AT miconithomas afeedbackmodelofattentionexplainsthediverseeffectsofattentiononneuralfiringratesandreceptivefieldstructure
AT vanrullenrufin afeedbackmodelofattentionexplainsthediverseeffectsofattentiononneuralfiringratesandreceptivefieldstructure
AT miconithomas feedbackmodelofattentionexplainsthediverseeffectsofattentiononneuralfiringratesandreceptivefieldstructure
AT vanrullenrufin feedbackmodelofattentionexplainsthediverseeffectsofattentiononneuralfiringratesandreceptivefieldstructure