Cargando…
Network mechanisms of intentional learning
The ability to learn new tasks rapidly is a prominent characteristic of human behaviour. This ability relies on flexible cognitive systems that adapt in order to encode temporary programs for processing non-automated tasks. Previous functional imaging studies have revealed distinct roles for the lat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academic Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4758826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26658925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.060 |
_version_ | 1782416644999479296 |
---|---|
author | Hampshire, Adam Hellyer, Peter J. Parkin, Beth Hiebert, Nole MacDonald, Penny Owen, Adrian M. Leech, Robert Rowe, James |
author_facet | Hampshire, Adam Hellyer, Peter J. Parkin, Beth Hiebert, Nole MacDonald, Penny Owen, Adrian M. Leech, Robert Rowe, James |
author_sort | Hampshire, Adam |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ability to learn new tasks rapidly is a prominent characteristic of human behaviour. This ability relies on flexible cognitive systems that adapt in order to encode temporary programs for processing non-automated tasks. Previous functional imaging studies have revealed distinct roles for the lateral frontal cortices (LFCs) and the ventral striatum in intentional learning processes. However, the human LFCs are complex; they house multiple distinct sub-regions, each of which co-activates with a different functional network. It remains unclear how these LFC networks differ in their functions and how they coordinate with each other, and the ventral striatum, to support intentional learning. Here, we apply a suite of fMRI connectivity methods to determine how LFC networks activate and interact at different stages of two novel tasks, in which arbitrary stimulus-response rules are learnt either from explicit instruction or by trial-and-error. We report that the networks activate en masse and in synchrony when novel rules are being learnt from instruction. However, these networks are not homogeneous in their functions; instead, the directed connectivities between them vary asymmetrically across the learning timecourse and they disengage from the task sequentially along a rostro-caudal axis. Furthermore, when negative feedback indicates the need to switch to alternative stimulus–response rules, there is additional input to the LFC networks from the ventral striatum. These results support the hypotheses that LFC networks interact as a hierarchical system during intentional learning and that signals from the ventral striatum have a driving influence on this system when the internal program for processing the task is updated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4758826 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Academic Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47588262016-03-04 Network mechanisms of intentional learning Hampshire, Adam Hellyer, Peter J. Parkin, Beth Hiebert, Nole MacDonald, Penny Owen, Adrian M. Leech, Robert Rowe, James Neuroimage Article The ability to learn new tasks rapidly is a prominent characteristic of human behaviour. This ability relies on flexible cognitive systems that adapt in order to encode temporary programs for processing non-automated tasks. Previous functional imaging studies have revealed distinct roles for the lateral frontal cortices (LFCs) and the ventral striatum in intentional learning processes. However, the human LFCs are complex; they house multiple distinct sub-regions, each of which co-activates with a different functional network. It remains unclear how these LFC networks differ in their functions and how they coordinate with each other, and the ventral striatum, to support intentional learning. Here, we apply a suite of fMRI connectivity methods to determine how LFC networks activate and interact at different stages of two novel tasks, in which arbitrary stimulus-response rules are learnt either from explicit instruction or by trial-and-error. We report that the networks activate en masse and in synchrony when novel rules are being learnt from instruction. However, these networks are not homogeneous in their functions; instead, the directed connectivities between them vary asymmetrically across the learning timecourse and they disengage from the task sequentially along a rostro-caudal axis. Furthermore, when negative feedback indicates the need to switch to alternative stimulus–response rules, there is additional input to the LFC networks from the ventral striatum. These results support the hypotheses that LFC networks interact as a hierarchical system during intentional learning and that signals from the ventral striatum have a driving influence on this system when the internal program for processing the task is updated. Academic Press 2016-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4758826/ /pubmed/26658925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.060 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hampshire, Adam Hellyer, Peter J. Parkin, Beth Hiebert, Nole MacDonald, Penny Owen, Adrian M. Leech, Robert Rowe, James Network mechanisms of intentional learning |
title | Network mechanisms of intentional learning |
title_full | Network mechanisms of intentional learning |
title_fullStr | Network mechanisms of intentional learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Network mechanisms of intentional learning |
title_short | Network mechanisms of intentional learning |
title_sort | network mechanisms of intentional learning |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4758826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26658925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.060 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hampshireadam networkmechanismsofintentionallearning AT hellyerpeterj networkmechanismsofintentionallearning AT parkinbeth networkmechanismsofintentionallearning AT hiebertnole networkmechanismsofintentionallearning AT macdonaldpenny networkmechanismsofintentionallearning AT owenadrianm networkmechanismsofintentionallearning AT leechrobert networkmechanismsofintentionallearning AT rowejames networkmechanismsofintentionallearning |