Cargando…

Meiotic and pedigree segregation analyses in carriers of t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) differing in localization of breakpoint positions at 4p subband 4p16.3 and 4p16.1

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare meiotic segregation in sperm cells from two carriers with t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) reciprocal chromosome translocations (RCTs), differing in localization of the breakpoint positions at the 4p subband—namely, 4p16.3 (carrier 1) and 4p16.1 (carrier 2)—and to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Midro, Alina T., Zollino, Marcella, Wiland, Ewa, Panasiuk, Barbara, Iwanowski, Piotr S., Murdolo, Marina, Śmigiel, Robert, Sąsiadek, Maria, Pilch, Jacek, Kurpisz, Maciej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26637389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0622-z
_version_ 1782416656071393280
author Midro, Alina T.
Zollino, Marcella
Wiland, Ewa
Panasiuk, Barbara
Iwanowski, Piotr S.
Murdolo, Marina
Śmigiel, Robert
Sąsiadek, Maria
Pilch, Jacek
Kurpisz, Maciej
author_facet Midro, Alina T.
Zollino, Marcella
Wiland, Ewa
Panasiuk, Barbara
Iwanowski, Piotr S.
Murdolo, Marina
Śmigiel, Robert
Sąsiadek, Maria
Pilch, Jacek
Kurpisz, Maciej
author_sort Midro, Alina T.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare meiotic segregation in sperm cells from two carriers with t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) reciprocal chromosome translocations (RCTs), differing in localization of the breakpoint positions at the 4p subband—namely, 4p16.3 (carrier 1) and 4p16.1 (carrier 2)—and to compare data of the pedigree analyses performed by direct method. METHODS: Three-color fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) on sperm cells and FISH mapping for the evaluation of the breakpoint positions, data from pedigrees, and direct segregation analysis of the pedigrees were performed. RESULTS: Similar proportions of normal/balanced and unbalanced sperm cells were found in both carriers. The most common was an alternate type of segregation (about 52 % and about 48 %, respectively). Unbalanced adjacent I and adjacent II karyotypes were found in similar proportions about 15 %. The direct segregation analysis (following Stengel-Rutkowski) of the pedigree of carriers of t(4;8)(p16.1;p23.1) was performed and results were compared with the data of the pedigree segregation analysis obtained earlier through the indirect method. The probability of live-born progeny with unbalanced karyotype for carriers of t(4;8)(p16.1;p23.1) was moderately high at 18.8 %—comparable to the value obtained using the indirect method for the same carriership, which was 12 %. This was, however, markedly lower than the value of 41.2 % obtained through the pedigree segregation indirect analysis estimated for carriers of t(4;8)(p16.3;p23.1), perhaps due to the unique composition of genes present within the 4p16.1–4p 16.3 region. CONCLUSIONS: Revealed differences in pedigree segregation analysis did not correspond to the very similar profile of meiotic segregation patterns presented by carrier 1 and carrier 2. Most probably, such discordances may be due to differences in embryo survival rates arising from different genetic backgrounds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4759004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47590042016-02-29 Meiotic and pedigree segregation analyses in carriers of t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) differing in localization of breakpoint positions at 4p subband 4p16.3 and 4p16.1 Midro, Alina T. Zollino, Marcella Wiland, Ewa Panasiuk, Barbara Iwanowski, Piotr S. Murdolo, Marina Śmigiel, Robert Sąsiadek, Maria Pilch, Jacek Kurpisz, Maciej J Assist Reprod Genet Genetics PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare meiotic segregation in sperm cells from two carriers with t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) reciprocal chromosome translocations (RCTs), differing in localization of the breakpoint positions at the 4p subband—namely, 4p16.3 (carrier 1) and 4p16.1 (carrier 2)—and to compare data of the pedigree analyses performed by direct method. METHODS: Three-color fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) on sperm cells and FISH mapping for the evaluation of the breakpoint positions, data from pedigrees, and direct segregation analysis of the pedigrees were performed. RESULTS: Similar proportions of normal/balanced and unbalanced sperm cells were found in both carriers. The most common was an alternate type of segregation (about 52 % and about 48 %, respectively). Unbalanced adjacent I and adjacent II karyotypes were found in similar proportions about 15 %. The direct segregation analysis (following Stengel-Rutkowski) of the pedigree of carriers of t(4;8)(p16.1;p23.1) was performed and results were compared with the data of the pedigree segregation analysis obtained earlier through the indirect method. The probability of live-born progeny with unbalanced karyotype for carriers of t(4;8)(p16.1;p23.1) was moderately high at 18.8 %—comparable to the value obtained using the indirect method for the same carriership, which was 12 %. This was, however, markedly lower than the value of 41.2 % obtained through the pedigree segregation indirect analysis estimated for carriers of t(4;8)(p16.3;p23.1), perhaps due to the unique composition of genes present within the 4p16.1–4p 16.3 region. CONCLUSIONS: Revealed differences in pedigree segregation analysis did not correspond to the very similar profile of meiotic segregation patterns presented by carrier 1 and carrier 2. Most probably, such discordances may be due to differences in embryo survival rates arising from different genetic backgrounds. Springer US 2015-12-04 2016-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4759004/ /pubmed/26637389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0622-z Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Genetics
Midro, Alina T.
Zollino, Marcella
Wiland, Ewa
Panasiuk, Barbara
Iwanowski, Piotr S.
Murdolo, Marina
Śmigiel, Robert
Sąsiadek, Maria
Pilch, Jacek
Kurpisz, Maciej
Meiotic and pedigree segregation analyses in carriers of t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) differing in localization of breakpoint positions at 4p subband 4p16.3 and 4p16.1
title Meiotic and pedigree segregation analyses in carriers of t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) differing in localization of breakpoint positions at 4p subband 4p16.3 and 4p16.1
title_full Meiotic and pedigree segregation analyses in carriers of t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) differing in localization of breakpoint positions at 4p subband 4p16.3 and 4p16.1
title_fullStr Meiotic and pedigree segregation analyses in carriers of t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) differing in localization of breakpoint positions at 4p subband 4p16.3 and 4p16.1
title_full_unstemmed Meiotic and pedigree segregation analyses in carriers of t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) differing in localization of breakpoint positions at 4p subband 4p16.3 and 4p16.1
title_short Meiotic and pedigree segregation analyses in carriers of t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) differing in localization of breakpoint positions at 4p subband 4p16.3 and 4p16.1
title_sort meiotic and pedigree segregation analyses in carriers of t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) differing in localization of breakpoint positions at 4p subband 4p16.3 and 4p16.1
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26637389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0622-z
work_keys_str_mv AT midroalinat meioticandpedigreesegregationanalysesincarriersoft48p16p231differinginlocalizationofbreakpointpositionsat4psubband4p163and4p161
AT zollinomarcella meioticandpedigreesegregationanalysesincarriersoft48p16p231differinginlocalizationofbreakpointpositionsat4psubband4p163and4p161
AT wilandewa meioticandpedigreesegregationanalysesincarriersoft48p16p231differinginlocalizationofbreakpointpositionsat4psubband4p163and4p161
AT panasiukbarbara meioticandpedigreesegregationanalysesincarriersoft48p16p231differinginlocalizationofbreakpointpositionsat4psubband4p163and4p161
AT iwanowskipiotrs meioticandpedigreesegregationanalysesincarriersoft48p16p231differinginlocalizationofbreakpointpositionsat4psubband4p163and4p161
AT murdolomarina meioticandpedigreesegregationanalysesincarriersoft48p16p231differinginlocalizationofbreakpointpositionsat4psubband4p163and4p161
AT smigielrobert meioticandpedigreesegregationanalysesincarriersoft48p16p231differinginlocalizationofbreakpointpositionsat4psubband4p163and4p161
AT sasiadekmaria meioticandpedigreesegregationanalysesincarriersoft48p16p231differinginlocalizationofbreakpointpositionsat4psubband4p163and4p161
AT pilchjacek meioticandpedigreesegregationanalysesincarriersoft48p16p231differinginlocalizationofbreakpointpositionsat4psubband4p163and4p161
AT kurpiszmaciej meioticandpedigreesegregationanalysesincarriersoft48p16p231differinginlocalizationofbreakpointpositionsat4psubband4p163and4p161