Cargando…
Meiotic and pedigree segregation analyses in carriers of t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) differing in localization of breakpoint positions at 4p subband 4p16.3 and 4p16.1
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare meiotic segregation in sperm cells from two carriers with t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) reciprocal chromosome translocations (RCTs), differing in localization of the breakpoint positions at the 4p subband—namely, 4p16.3 (carrier 1) and 4p16.1 (carrier 2)—and to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26637389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0622-z |
_version_ | 1782416656071393280 |
---|---|
author | Midro, Alina T. Zollino, Marcella Wiland, Ewa Panasiuk, Barbara Iwanowski, Piotr S. Murdolo, Marina Śmigiel, Robert Sąsiadek, Maria Pilch, Jacek Kurpisz, Maciej |
author_facet | Midro, Alina T. Zollino, Marcella Wiland, Ewa Panasiuk, Barbara Iwanowski, Piotr S. Murdolo, Marina Śmigiel, Robert Sąsiadek, Maria Pilch, Jacek Kurpisz, Maciej |
author_sort | Midro, Alina T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare meiotic segregation in sperm cells from two carriers with t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) reciprocal chromosome translocations (RCTs), differing in localization of the breakpoint positions at the 4p subband—namely, 4p16.3 (carrier 1) and 4p16.1 (carrier 2)—and to compare data of the pedigree analyses performed by direct method. METHODS: Three-color fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) on sperm cells and FISH mapping for the evaluation of the breakpoint positions, data from pedigrees, and direct segregation analysis of the pedigrees were performed. RESULTS: Similar proportions of normal/balanced and unbalanced sperm cells were found in both carriers. The most common was an alternate type of segregation (about 52 % and about 48 %, respectively). Unbalanced adjacent I and adjacent II karyotypes were found in similar proportions about 15 %. The direct segregation analysis (following Stengel-Rutkowski) of the pedigree of carriers of t(4;8)(p16.1;p23.1) was performed and results were compared with the data of the pedigree segregation analysis obtained earlier through the indirect method. The probability of live-born progeny with unbalanced karyotype for carriers of t(4;8)(p16.1;p23.1) was moderately high at 18.8 %—comparable to the value obtained using the indirect method for the same carriership, which was 12 %. This was, however, markedly lower than the value of 41.2 % obtained through the pedigree segregation indirect analysis estimated for carriers of t(4;8)(p16.3;p23.1), perhaps due to the unique composition of genes present within the 4p16.1–4p 16.3 region. CONCLUSIONS: Revealed differences in pedigree segregation analysis did not correspond to the very similar profile of meiotic segregation patterns presented by carrier 1 and carrier 2. Most probably, such discordances may be due to differences in embryo survival rates arising from different genetic backgrounds. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4759004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47590042016-02-29 Meiotic and pedigree segregation analyses in carriers of t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) differing in localization of breakpoint positions at 4p subband 4p16.3 and 4p16.1 Midro, Alina T. Zollino, Marcella Wiland, Ewa Panasiuk, Barbara Iwanowski, Piotr S. Murdolo, Marina Śmigiel, Robert Sąsiadek, Maria Pilch, Jacek Kurpisz, Maciej J Assist Reprod Genet Genetics PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare meiotic segregation in sperm cells from two carriers with t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) reciprocal chromosome translocations (RCTs), differing in localization of the breakpoint positions at the 4p subband—namely, 4p16.3 (carrier 1) and 4p16.1 (carrier 2)—and to compare data of the pedigree analyses performed by direct method. METHODS: Three-color fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) on sperm cells and FISH mapping for the evaluation of the breakpoint positions, data from pedigrees, and direct segregation analysis of the pedigrees were performed. RESULTS: Similar proportions of normal/balanced and unbalanced sperm cells were found in both carriers. The most common was an alternate type of segregation (about 52 % and about 48 %, respectively). Unbalanced adjacent I and adjacent II karyotypes were found in similar proportions about 15 %. The direct segregation analysis (following Stengel-Rutkowski) of the pedigree of carriers of t(4;8)(p16.1;p23.1) was performed and results were compared with the data of the pedigree segregation analysis obtained earlier through the indirect method. The probability of live-born progeny with unbalanced karyotype for carriers of t(4;8)(p16.1;p23.1) was moderately high at 18.8 %—comparable to the value obtained using the indirect method for the same carriership, which was 12 %. This was, however, markedly lower than the value of 41.2 % obtained through the pedigree segregation indirect analysis estimated for carriers of t(4;8)(p16.3;p23.1), perhaps due to the unique composition of genes present within the 4p16.1–4p 16.3 region. CONCLUSIONS: Revealed differences in pedigree segregation analysis did not correspond to the very similar profile of meiotic segregation patterns presented by carrier 1 and carrier 2. Most probably, such discordances may be due to differences in embryo survival rates arising from different genetic backgrounds. Springer US 2015-12-04 2016-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4759004/ /pubmed/26637389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0622-z Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Midro, Alina T. Zollino, Marcella Wiland, Ewa Panasiuk, Barbara Iwanowski, Piotr S. Murdolo, Marina Śmigiel, Robert Sąsiadek, Maria Pilch, Jacek Kurpisz, Maciej Meiotic and pedigree segregation analyses in carriers of t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) differing in localization of breakpoint positions at 4p subband 4p16.3 and 4p16.1 |
title | Meiotic and pedigree segregation analyses in carriers of t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) differing in localization of breakpoint positions at 4p subband 4p16.3 and 4p16.1 |
title_full | Meiotic and pedigree segregation analyses in carriers of t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) differing in localization of breakpoint positions at 4p subband 4p16.3 and 4p16.1 |
title_fullStr | Meiotic and pedigree segregation analyses in carriers of t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) differing in localization of breakpoint positions at 4p subband 4p16.3 and 4p16.1 |
title_full_unstemmed | Meiotic and pedigree segregation analyses in carriers of t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) differing in localization of breakpoint positions at 4p subband 4p16.3 and 4p16.1 |
title_short | Meiotic and pedigree segregation analyses in carriers of t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) differing in localization of breakpoint positions at 4p subband 4p16.3 and 4p16.1 |
title_sort | meiotic and pedigree segregation analyses in carriers of t(4;8)(p16;p23.1) differing in localization of breakpoint positions at 4p subband 4p16.3 and 4p16.1 |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26637389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0622-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT midroalinat meioticandpedigreesegregationanalysesincarriersoft48p16p231differinginlocalizationofbreakpointpositionsat4psubband4p163and4p161 AT zollinomarcella meioticandpedigreesegregationanalysesincarriersoft48p16p231differinginlocalizationofbreakpointpositionsat4psubband4p163and4p161 AT wilandewa meioticandpedigreesegregationanalysesincarriersoft48p16p231differinginlocalizationofbreakpointpositionsat4psubband4p163and4p161 AT panasiukbarbara meioticandpedigreesegregationanalysesincarriersoft48p16p231differinginlocalizationofbreakpointpositionsat4psubband4p163and4p161 AT iwanowskipiotrs meioticandpedigreesegregationanalysesincarriersoft48p16p231differinginlocalizationofbreakpointpositionsat4psubband4p163and4p161 AT murdolomarina meioticandpedigreesegregationanalysesincarriersoft48p16p231differinginlocalizationofbreakpointpositionsat4psubband4p163and4p161 AT smigielrobert meioticandpedigreesegregationanalysesincarriersoft48p16p231differinginlocalizationofbreakpointpositionsat4psubband4p163and4p161 AT sasiadekmaria meioticandpedigreesegregationanalysesincarriersoft48p16p231differinginlocalizationofbreakpointpositionsat4psubband4p163and4p161 AT pilchjacek meioticandpedigreesegregationanalysesincarriersoft48p16p231differinginlocalizationofbreakpointpositionsat4psubband4p163and4p161 AT kurpiszmaciej meioticandpedigreesegregationanalysesincarriersoft48p16p231differinginlocalizationofbreakpointpositionsat4psubband4p163and4p161 |