Cargando…
Angiotensin II stimulates superoxide production by nitric oxide synthase in thick ascending limbs
Angiotensin II (Ang II) causes nitric oxide synthase (NOS) to become a source of superoxide (O(2) (−)) via a protein kinase C (PKC)‐dependent process in endothelial cells. Ang II stimulates both NO and O(2) (−) production in thick ascending limbs. We hypothesized that Ang II causes O(2) (−) producti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26884476 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12697 |
Sumario: | Angiotensin II (Ang II) causes nitric oxide synthase (NOS) to become a source of superoxide (O(2) (−)) via a protein kinase C (PKC)‐dependent process in endothelial cells. Ang II stimulates both NO and O(2) (−) production in thick ascending limbs. We hypothesized that Ang II causes O(2) (−) production by NOS in thick ascending limbs via a PKC‐dependent mechanism. NO production was measured in isolated rat thick ascending limbs using DAF‐FM, whereas O(2) (−) was measured in thick ascending limb suspensions using the lucigenin assay. Consistent stimulation of NO was observed with 1 nmol/L Ang II (P < 0.001; n = 9). This concentration of Ang II‐stimulated O(2) (−) production by 50% (1.77 ± 0.26 vs. 2.62 ± 0.36 relative lights units (RLU)/s/μg protein; P < 0.04; n = 5). In the presence of the NOS inhibitor L‐NAME, Ang II‐stimulated O(2) (−) decreased from 2.02 ± 0.29 to 1.10 ± 0.11 RLU/s/μg protein (P < 0.01; n = 8). L‐arginine alone did not change Ang II‐stimulated O(2) (−) (2.34 ± 0.22 vs. 2.29 ± 0.29 RLU/s/μg protein; n = 5). In the presence of Ang II plus the PKC α/β (1) inhibitor Gö 6976, L‐NAME had no effect on O(2) (−) production (0.78 ± 0.23 vs. 0.62 ± 0.11 RLU/s/μg protein; n = 7). In the presence of Ang II plus apocynin, a NADPH oxidase inhibitor, L‐NAME did not change O(2) (−) (0.59 ± 0.04 vs. 0.61 ± ×0.08 RLU/s/μg protein; n = 5). We conclude that: (1) Ang II causes NOS to produce O(2) (−) in thick ascending limbs via a PKC‐ and NADPH oxidase‐dependent process; and (2) the effect of Ang II is not due to limited substrate. |
---|