Cargando…
But I Was So Sure! Metacognitive Judgments Are Less Accurate Given Prospectively than Retrospectively
Prospective and retrospective metacognitive judgments have been studied extensively in the field of memory; however, their accuracy has not been systematically compared. Such a comparison is important for studying how metacognitive judgments are formed. Here, we present the results of an experiment...
Autores principales: | Siedlecka, Marta, Paulewicz, Borysław, Wierzchoń, Michał |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26925023 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00218 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Confounding in Studies on Metacognition: A Preliminary Causal Analysis Framework
por: Paulewicz, Borysław, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Post-Decision Wagering Affects Metacognitive Awareness of Emotional Stimuli: An Event Related Potential Study
por: Wierzchoń, Michał, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Motor Cortex Activity Influences Visual Awareness Judgments
por: Hobot, Justyna, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Confidence in action: Differences between perceived accuracy of decision and motor response
por: Siedlecka, Marta, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Commentary: Sure I'm Sure: Prefrontal Oscillations Support Metacognitive Monitoring of Decision Making
por: Ostad Rahimi, Hamid, et al.
Publicado: (2018)