Cargando…

Diverse effects of a biosurfactant from Rhodococcus ruber IEGM 231 on the adhesion of resting and growing bacteria to polystyrene

This study evaluated the effects of a trehalolipid biosurfactant produced by Rhodococcus ruber IEGM 231 on the bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on the surface of polystyrene microplates. The adhesion of Gram-positive (Arthrobacter simplex, Bacillus subtilis, Brevibacterium linens, Corynebact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuyukina, Maria S., Ivshina, Irena B., Korshunova, Irina O., Stukova, Galina I., Krivoruchko, Anastasiya V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26888203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13568-016-0186-z
_version_ 1782416721054793728
author Kuyukina, Maria S.
Ivshina, Irena B.
Korshunova, Irina O.
Stukova, Galina I.
Krivoruchko, Anastasiya V.
author_facet Kuyukina, Maria S.
Ivshina, Irena B.
Korshunova, Irina O.
Stukova, Galina I.
Krivoruchko, Anastasiya V.
author_sort Kuyukina, Maria S.
collection PubMed
description This study evaluated the effects of a trehalolipid biosurfactant produced by Rhodococcus ruber IEGM 231 on the bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on the surface of polystyrene microplates. The adhesion of Gram-positive (Arthrobacter simplex, Bacillus subtilis, Brevibacterium linens, Corynebacterium glutamicum, Micrococcus luteus) and Gram-negative (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas fluorescencens) bacteria correlated differently with the cell hydrophobicity and surface charge. In particular, exponentially growing bacterial cells with increased hydrophobicities adhered stronger to polystyrene compared to more hydrophilic stationary phase cells. Also, a moderate correlation (0.56) was found between zeta potential and adhesion values of actively growing bacteria, suggesting that less negatively charged cells adhered stronger to polystyrene. Efficient biosurfactant concentrations (10–100 mg/L) were determined, which selectively inhibited (up to 76 %) the adhesion of tested bacterial cultures, however without inhibiting their growth. The biosurfactant was more active against growing bacteria rather than resting cells, thus showing high biofilm-preventing properties. Contact angle measurements revealed more hydrophilic surface of the biosurfactant-covered polystyrene compared to bare polystyrene, which allowed less adhesion of hydrophobic bacteria. Furthermore, surface free-energy calculations showed a decrease in the Wan der Waals (γ(LW)) component and an increase in the acid-based (γ(AB)) component caused by the biosurfactant coating of polysterene. However, our results suggested that the biosurfactant inhibited the adhesion of bacteria independently on their surface charges. AFM scanning revealed three-type biosurfactant structures (micelles, cord-like assemblies and large vesicles) formed on glass, depending on concentrations used, that could lead to diverse anti-adhesive effects against different bacterial species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4759446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47594462016-03-01 Diverse effects of a biosurfactant from Rhodococcus ruber IEGM 231 on the adhesion of resting and growing bacteria to polystyrene Kuyukina, Maria S. Ivshina, Irena B. Korshunova, Irina O. Stukova, Galina I. Krivoruchko, Anastasiya V. AMB Express Original Article This study evaluated the effects of a trehalolipid biosurfactant produced by Rhodococcus ruber IEGM 231 on the bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on the surface of polystyrene microplates. The adhesion of Gram-positive (Arthrobacter simplex, Bacillus subtilis, Brevibacterium linens, Corynebacterium glutamicum, Micrococcus luteus) and Gram-negative (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas fluorescencens) bacteria correlated differently with the cell hydrophobicity and surface charge. In particular, exponentially growing bacterial cells with increased hydrophobicities adhered stronger to polystyrene compared to more hydrophilic stationary phase cells. Also, a moderate correlation (0.56) was found between zeta potential and adhesion values of actively growing bacteria, suggesting that less negatively charged cells adhered stronger to polystyrene. Efficient biosurfactant concentrations (10–100 mg/L) were determined, which selectively inhibited (up to 76 %) the adhesion of tested bacterial cultures, however without inhibiting their growth. The biosurfactant was more active against growing bacteria rather than resting cells, thus showing high biofilm-preventing properties. Contact angle measurements revealed more hydrophilic surface of the biosurfactant-covered polystyrene compared to bare polystyrene, which allowed less adhesion of hydrophobic bacteria. Furthermore, surface free-energy calculations showed a decrease in the Wan der Waals (γ(LW)) component and an increase in the acid-based (γ(AB)) component caused by the biosurfactant coating of polysterene. However, our results suggested that the biosurfactant inhibited the adhesion of bacteria independently on their surface charges. AFM scanning revealed three-type biosurfactant structures (micelles, cord-like assemblies and large vesicles) formed on glass, depending on concentrations used, that could lead to diverse anti-adhesive effects against different bacterial species. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4759446/ /pubmed/26888203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13568-016-0186-z Text en © Kuyukina et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kuyukina, Maria S.
Ivshina, Irena B.
Korshunova, Irina O.
Stukova, Galina I.
Krivoruchko, Anastasiya V.
Diverse effects of a biosurfactant from Rhodococcus ruber IEGM 231 on the adhesion of resting and growing bacteria to polystyrene
title Diverse effects of a biosurfactant from Rhodococcus ruber IEGM 231 on the adhesion of resting and growing bacteria to polystyrene
title_full Diverse effects of a biosurfactant from Rhodococcus ruber IEGM 231 on the adhesion of resting and growing bacteria to polystyrene
title_fullStr Diverse effects of a biosurfactant from Rhodococcus ruber IEGM 231 on the adhesion of resting and growing bacteria to polystyrene
title_full_unstemmed Diverse effects of a biosurfactant from Rhodococcus ruber IEGM 231 on the adhesion of resting and growing bacteria to polystyrene
title_short Diverse effects of a biosurfactant from Rhodococcus ruber IEGM 231 on the adhesion of resting and growing bacteria to polystyrene
title_sort diverse effects of a biosurfactant from rhodococcus ruber iegm 231 on the adhesion of resting and growing bacteria to polystyrene
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26888203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13568-016-0186-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kuyukinamarias diverseeffectsofabiosurfactantfromrhodococcusruberiegm231ontheadhesionofrestingandgrowingbacteriatopolystyrene
AT ivshinairenab diverseeffectsofabiosurfactantfromrhodococcusruberiegm231ontheadhesionofrestingandgrowingbacteriatopolystyrene
AT korshunovairinao diverseeffectsofabiosurfactantfromrhodococcusruberiegm231ontheadhesionofrestingandgrowingbacteriatopolystyrene
AT stukovagalinai diverseeffectsofabiosurfactantfromrhodococcusruberiegm231ontheadhesionofrestingandgrowingbacteriatopolystyrene
AT krivoruchkoanastasiyav diverseeffectsofabiosurfactantfromrhodococcusruberiegm231ontheadhesionofrestingandgrowingbacteriatopolystyrene