Cargando…

Angioplasty of unprotected left main coronary stenosis: Real world experience of a single-operator group from eastern India

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery is the standard treatment of unprotected left main coronary stenosis (ULMCA). However, in the real world scenario, many of these patients are unfit for CABG or prefer angioplasty as an alternative when offered the choice. METHODS: A total of 86 clinic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ray, Shuvanan, Mazumder, Alok, Kumar, Soumitra, Bhattacharjee, Prithwiraj, Rozario, David, Bandyopadhyay, Siddhartha, Mukherjee, Sanjeev S., Deb, P.K., Bandyopadhyay, Amal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26896263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2015.07.014
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery is the standard treatment of unprotected left main coronary stenosis (ULMCA). However, in the real world scenario, many of these patients are unfit for CABG or prefer angioplasty as an alternative when offered the choice. METHODS: A total of 86 clinically stable patients with ULMCA stenosis who were unfit or unwilling for CABG underwent PCI with DES at two tertiary care centers in Kolkata. Patients were followed up prospectively for a median of 34.6 months for major adverse cardiovascular events. Angiographic follow-up was done after 1 year of index procedure or earlier, if indicated. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (64%) had distal left main stenosis. Two-stent technique was used in 19 patients (22%) and single-stent technique in 36 patients (42%) with distal left main lesion. Thirteen patients (15.1%) had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤45%. There was no in-hospital death, MI, or stent thrombosis. During follow-up, major adverse cardiac event (MACE) occurred in 9 patients (10.5%). Our study revealed significantly greater MACE in patients with distal left main lesion with LVEF ≤45% (50% vs 6.38%, p = 0.0002), high SYNTAX score (36.36% vs 6.82%, p = 0.008), and diabetes (17.95% vs 0.00%, p = 0.07). Overall, also patients with Diabetes, LVEF ≤ 45%, and SYNTAX score >32 had significantly higher MACE. Use of IC Stent, IVUS, or procedural strategy in distal lesion did not affect MACE. CONCLUSION: In selective patients with low-intermediate SYNTAX score and without diabetes and LV dysfunction, ULMCA PCI with DES is feasible.