Cargando…

The applicability of correction factor for corneal thickness on non-contact tonometer measured intraocular pressure in LASIK treated eyes

PURPOSE: To determine the applicability of central corneal thickness (CCT) based correction factor for non-contact tonometer (NCT) measured intraocular pressure (IOP) readings. METHOD: A prospective, non-randomized study involved 346 eyes of 173 consecutive patients with age ⩾21 years undergoing las...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jethani, Jitendra, Dave, Paaraj, Jethani, Monica, Desai, Yogesh, Patel, Purvi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2015.11.001
_version_ 1782416735268241408
author Jethani, Jitendra
Dave, Paaraj
Jethani, Monica
Desai, Yogesh
Patel, Purvi
author_facet Jethani, Jitendra
Dave, Paaraj
Jethani, Monica
Desai, Yogesh
Patel, Purvi
author_sort Jethani, Jitendra
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine the applicability of central corneal thickness (CCT) based correction factor for non-contact tonometer (NCT) measured intraocular pressure (IOP) readings. METHOD: A prospective, non-randomized study involved 346 eyes of 173 consecutive patients with age ⩾21 years undergoing laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia and/or myopic astigmatism. The CCT and IOP were measured before and after the LASIK procedure. The IOP pre and post-LASIK was compared after applying the correction factor for CCT. Patients not completing the 3 month postoperative follow-up were excluded. RESULTS: The median spherical equivalent before undergoing LASIK was −4.25D (inter-quartile range, −3.25D). The mean preoperative CCT was 536.82 ± 33.71 μm which reduced to 477.55 ± 39.3 μm (p < 0.01) post-LASIK. The mean IOP reduced from a preoperative value of 14.6 ± 2.32 mmHg to 10.64 ± 2.45 mmHg postoperatively (p < 0.01). On applying correction for the corneal thickness, the pre and postoperative IOP was 15.14 ± 2.8 mmHg and 15.37 ± 2.65 mmHg (p = 0.06) respectively with a strong positive correlation (r = 0.7, p < 0.01). Three hundred eyes (86.7%) had an absolute difference in IOP of less than 3.0 mmHg post-CCT correction which is within the retest variability of NCT. Only 46 eyes (13.3%) had an absolute difference of more than 3.0 mmHg. CONCLUSION: The modified Ehler’s correction algorithm used in this study can be effectively applied in the normal IOP range in a majority of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4759510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47595102016-03-04 The applicability of correction factor for corneal thickness on non-contact tonometer measured intraocular pressure in LASIK treated eyes Jethani, Jitendra Dave, Paaraj Jethani, Monica Desai, Yogesh Patel, Purvi Saudi J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To determine the applicability of central corneal thickness (CCT) based correction factor for non-contact tonometer (NCT) measured intraocular pressure (IOP) readings. METHOD: A prospective, non-randomized study involved 346 eyes of 173 consecutive patients with age ⩾21 years undergoing laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia and/or myopic astigmatism. The CCT and IOP were measured before and after the LASIK procedure. The IOP pre and post-LASIK was compared after applying the correction factor for CCT. Patients not completing the 3 month postoperative follow-up were excluded. RESULTS: The median spherical equivalent before undergoing LASIK was −4.25D (inter-quartile range, −3.25D). The mean preoperative CCT was 536.82 ± 33.71 μm which reduced to 477.55 ± 39.3 μm (p < 0.01) post-LASIK. The mean IOP reduced from a preoperative value of 14.6 ± 2.32 mmHg to 10.64 ± 2.45 mmHg postoperatively (p < 0.01). On applying correction for the corneal thickness, the pre and postoperative IOP was 15.14 ± 2.8 mmHg and 15.37 ± 2.65 mmHg (p = 0.06) respectively with a strong positive correlation (r = 0.7, p < 0.01). Three hundred eyes (86.7%) had an absolute difference in IOP of less than 3.0 mmHg post-CCT correction which is within the retest variability of NCT. Only 46 eyes (13.3%) had an absolute difference of more than 3.0 mmHg. CONCLUSION: The modified Ehler’s correction algorithm used in this study can be effectively applied in the normal IOP range in a majority of patients. Elsevier 2016 2015-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4759510/ /pubmed/26949354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2015.11.001 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Jethani, Jitendra
Dave, Paaraj
Jethani, Monica
Desai, Yogesh
Patel, Purvi
The applicability of correction factor for corneal thickness on non-contact tonometer measured intraocular pressure in LASIK treated eyes
title The applicability of correction factor for corneal thickness on non-contact tonometer measured intraocular pressure in LASIK treated eyes
title_full The applicability of correction factor for corneal thickness on non-contact tonometer measured intraocular pressure in LASIK treated eyes
title_fullStr The applicability of correction factor for corneal thickness on non-contact tonometer measured intraocular pressure in LASIK treated eyes
title_full_unstemmed The applicability of correction factor for corneal thickness on non-contact tonometer measured intraocular pressure in LASIK treated eyes
title_short The applicability of correction factor for corneal thickness on non-contact tonometer measured intraocular pressure in LASIK treated eyes
title_sort applicability of correction factor for corneal thickness on non-contact tonometer measured intraocular pressure in lasik treated eyes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2015.11.001
work_keys_str_mv AT jethanijitendra theapplicabilityofcorrectionfactorforcornealthicknessonnoncontacttonometermeasuredintraocularpressureinlasiktreatedeyes
AT davepaaraj theapplicabilityofcorrectionfactorforcornealthicknessonnoncontacttonometermeasuredintraocularpressureinlasiktreatedeyes
AT jethanimonica theapplicabilityofcorrectionfactorforcornealthicknessonnoncontacttonometermeasuredintraocularpressureinlasiktreatedeyes
AT desaiyogesh theapplicabilityofcorrectionfactorforcornealthicknessonnoncontacttonometermeasuredintraocularpressureinlasiktreatedeyes
AT patelpurvi theapplicabilityofcorrectionfactorforcornealthicknessonnoncontacttonometermeasuredintraocularpressureinlasiktreatedeyes
AT jethanijitendra applicabilityofcorrectionfactorforcornealthicknessonnoncontacttonometermeasuredintraocularpressureinlasiktreatedeyes
AT davepaaraj applicabilityofcorrectionfactorforcornealthicknessonnoncontacttonometermeasuredintraocularpressureinlasiktreatedeyes
AT jethanimonica applicabilityofcorrectionfactorforcornealthicknessonnoncontacttonometermeasuredintraocularpressureinlasiktreatedeyes
AT desaiyogesh applicabilityofcorrectionfactorforcornealthicknessonnoncontacttonometermeasuredintraocularpressureinlasiktreatedeyes
AT patelpurvi applicabilityofcorrectionfactorforcornealthicknessonnoncontacttonometermeasuredintraocularpressureinlasiktreatedeyes