Cargando…
Prognostic role of microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
The impact and management of microscopically positive margins in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) remain unclear. The aim of this study is to estimate the prognostic value of surgical margins for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with primary GISTs. Twelve stud...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26891953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep21541 |
_version_ | 1782416754749734912 |
---|---|
author | Zhi, Xiaofei Jiang, Baofei Yu, Junbo Røe, Oluf Dimitri Qin, Jun Ni, Qingfeng Sun, Luning Xu, Meirong Zhu, Jianwei Ma, Lilin |
author_facet | Zhi, Xiaofei Jiang, Baofei Yu, Junbo Røe, Oluf Dimitri Qin, Jun Ni, Qingfeng Sun, Luning Xu, Meirong Zhu, Jianwei Ma, Lilin |
author_sort | Zhi, Xiaofei |
collection | PubMed |
description | The impact and management of microscopically positive margins in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) remain unclear. The aim of this study is to estimate the prognostic value of surgical margins for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with primary GISTs. Twelve studies with 1985 GIST patients were included. The overall recurrence rate in R1 resection and R0 resection group was 0.364 (95% CI 0.299–0.429) and 0.296 (95% CI 0.161–0.430), respectively. Meta-analysis confirmed that a microscopically positive margin could significantly impact the disease-free survival (HR 1.596, 95% CI 1.128–2.258; I(2) = 37.5%, P value = 0.091), but had no influence on overall survival (HR 1.430, 95% CI 0.608–3.363; I(2) = 60.8%, P value = 0.013). Importantly, subgroup analysis revealed that adjuvant imatinib treatment could attenuate the risk of recurrence for primary GIST patients who received R1 resection. (HR 1.308, 95% CI 0.583–2.935; I(2) = 53.2%, P value = 0.074). The level of evidence achieved in this study was “moderate” for DFS and “low” for OS. In conclusion, this study revealed that a microscopically positive margin is an unfavorable prognostic factor for GIST patients with R1 resection, and adjuvant imatinib treatment is proved to be effective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4759596 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47595962016-02-29 Prognostic role of microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhi, Xiaofei Jiang, Baofei Yu, Junbo Røe, Oluf Dimitri Qin, Jun Ni, Qingfeng Sun, Luning Xu, Meirong Zhu, Jianwei Ma, Lilin Sci Rep Article The impact and management of microscopically positive margins in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) remain unclear. The aim of this study is to estimate the prognostic value of surgical margins for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with primary GISTs. Twelve studies with 1985 GIST patients were included. The overall recurrence rate in R1 resection and R0 resection group was 0.364 (95% CI 0.299–0.429) and 0.296 (95% CI 0.161–0.430), respectively. Meta-analysis confirmed that a microscopically positive margin could significantly impact the disease-free survival (HR 1.596, 95% CI 1.128–2.258; I(2) = 37.5%, P value = 0.091), but had no influence on overall survival (HR 1.430, 95% CI 0.608–3.363; I(2) = 60.8%, P value = 0.013). Importantly, subgroup analysis revealed that adjuvant imatinib treatment could attenuate the risk of recurrence for primary GIST patients who received R1 resection. (HR 1.308, 95% CI 0.583–2.935; I(2) = 53.2%, P value = 0.074). The level of evidence achieved in this study was “moderate” for DFS and “low” for OS. In conclusion, this study revealed that a microscopically positive margin is an unfavorable prognostic factor for GIST patients with R1 resection, and adjuvant imatinib treatment is proved to be effective. Nature Publishing Group 2016-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4759596/ /pubmed/26891953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep21541 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Zhi, Xiaofei Jiang, Baofei Yu, Junbo Røe, Oluf Dimitri Qin, Jun Ni, Qingfeng Sun, Luning Xu, Meirong Zhu, Jianwei Ma, Lilin Prognostic role of microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Prognostic role of microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Prognostic role of microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Prognostic role of microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic role of microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Prognostic role of microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | prognostic role of microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26891953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep21541 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhixiaofei prognosticroleofmicroscopicallypositivemarginsforprimarygastrointestinalstromaltumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jiangbaofei prognosticroleofmicroscopicallypositivemarginsforprimarygastrointestinalstromaltumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yujunbo prognosticroleofmicroscopicallypositivemarginsforprimarygastrointestinalstromaltumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT røeolufdimitri prognosticroleofmicroscopicallypositivemarginsforprimarygastrointestinalstromaltumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT qinjun prognosticroleofmicroscopicallypositivemarginsforprimarygastrointestinalstromaltumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT niqingfeng prognosticroleofmicroscopicallypositivemarginsforprimarygastrointestinalstromaltumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sunluning prognosticroleofmicroscopicallypositivemarginsforprimarygastrointestinalstromaltumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xumeirong prognosticroleofmicroscopicallypositivemarginsforprimarygastrointestinalstromaltumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhujianwei prognosticroleofmicroscopicallypositivemarginsforprimarygastrointestinalstromaltumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT malilin prognosticroleofmicroscopicallypositivemarginsforprimarygastrointestinalstromaltumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |