Cargando…

Prognostic role of microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The impact and management of microscopically positive margins in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) remain unclear. The aim of this study is to estimate the prognostic value of surgical margins for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with primary GISTs. Twelve stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhi, Xiaofei, Jiang, Baofei, Yu, Junbo, Røe, Oluf Dimitri, Qin, Jun, Ni, Qingfeng, Sun, Luning, Xu, Meirong, Zhu, Jianwei, Ma, Lilin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26891953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep21541
_version_ 1782416754749734912
author Zhi, Xiaofei
Jiang, Baofei
Yu, Junbo
Røe, Oluf Dimitri
Qin, Jun
Ni, Qingfeng
Sun, Luning
Xu, Meirong
Zhu, Jianwei
Ma, Lilin
author_facet Zhi, Xiaofei
Jiang, Baofei
Yu, Junbo
Røe, Oluf Dimitri
Qin, Jun
Ni, Qingfeng
Sun, Luning
Xu, Meirong
Zhu, Jianwei
Ma, Lilin
author_sort Zhi, Xiaofei
collection PubMed
description The impact and management of microscopically positive margins in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) remain unclear. The aim of this study is to estimate the prognostic value of surgical margins for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with primary GISTs. Twelve studies with 1985 GIST patients were included. The overall recurrence rate in R1 resection and R0 resection group was 0.364 (95% CI 0.299–0.429) and 0.296 (95% CI 0.161–0.430), respectively. Meta-analysis confirmed that a microscopically positive margin could significantly impact the disease-free survival (HR 1.596, 95% CI 1.128–2.258; I(2) = 37.5%, P value = 0.091), but had no influence on overall survival (HR 1.430, 95% CI 0.608–3.363; I(2) = 60.8%, P value = 0.013). Importantly, subgroup analysis revealed that adjuvant imatinib treatment could attenuate the risk of recurrence for primary GIST patients who received R1 resection. (HR 1.308, 95% CI 0.583–2.935; I(2) = 53.2%, P value = 0.074). The level of evidence achieved in this study was “moderate” for DFS and “low” for OS. In conclusion, this study revealed that a microscopically positive margin is an unfavorable prognostic factor for GIST patients with R1 resection, and adjuvant imatinib treatment is proved to be effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4759596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47595962016-02-29 Prognostic role of microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhi, Xiaofei Jiang, Baofei Yu, Junbo Røe, Oluf Dimitri Qin, Jun Ni, Qingfeng Sun, Luning Xu, Meirong Zhu, Jianwei Ma, Lilin Sci Rep Article The impact and management of microscopically positive margins in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) remain unclear. The aim of this study is to estimate the prognostic value of surgical margins for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with primary GISTs. Twelve studies with 1985 GIST patients were included. The overall recurrence rate in R1 resection and R0 resection group was 0.364 (95% CI 0.299–0.429) and 0.296 (95% CI 0.161–0.430), respectively. Meta-analysis confirmed that a microscopically positive margin could significantly impact the disease-free survival (HR 1.596, 95% CI 1.128–2.258; I(2) = 37.5%, P value = 0.091), but had no influence on overall survival (HR 1.430, 95% CI 0.608–3.363; I(2) = 60.8%, P value = 0.013). Importantly, subgroup analysis revealed that adjuvant imatinib treatment could attenuate the risk of recurrence for primary GIST patients who received R1 resection. (HR 1.308, 95% CI 0.583–2.935; I(2) = 53.2%, P value = 0.074). The level of evidence achieved in this study was “moderate” for DFS and “low” for OS. In conclusion, this study revealed that a microscopically positive margin is an unfavorable prognostic factor for GIST patients with R1 resection, and adjuvant imatinib treatment is proved to be effective. Nature Publishing Group 2016-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4759596/ /pubmed/26891953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep21541 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Zhi, Xiaofei
Jiang, Baofei
Yu, Junbo
Røe, Oluf Dimitri
Qin, Jun
Ni, Qingfeng
Sun, Luning
Xu, Meirong
Zhu, Jianwei
Ma, Lilin
Prognostic role of microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Prognostic role of microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Prognostic role of microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Prognostic role of microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic role of microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Prognostic role of microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort prognostic role of microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26891953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep21541
work_keys_str_mv AT zhixiaofei prognosticroleofmicroscopicallypositivemarginsforprimarygastrointestinalstromaltumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiangbaofei prognosticroleofmicroscopicallypositivemarginsforprimarygastrointestinalstromaltumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yujunbo prognosticroleofmicroscopicallypositivemarginsforprimarygastrointestinalstromaltumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT røeolufdimitri prognosticroleofmicroscopicallypositivemarginsforprimarygastrointestinalstromaltumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qinjun prognosticroleofmicroscopicallypositivemarginsforprimarygastrointestinalstromaltumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT niqingfeng prognosticroleofmicroscopicallypositivemarginsforprimarygastrointestinalstromaltumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sunluning prognosticroleofmicroscopicallypositivemarginsforprimarygastrointestinalstromaltumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xumeirong prognosticroleofmicroscopicallypositivemarginsforprimarygastrointestinalstromaltumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhujianwei prognosticroleofmicroscopicallypositivemarginsforprimarygastrointestinalstromaltumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT malilin prognosticroleofmicroscopicallypositivemarginsforprimarygastrointestinalstromaltumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis