Cargando…
Head to head comparison of the propensity score and the high-dimensional propensity score matching methods
BACKGROUND: Comparative performance of the traditional propensity score (PS) and high-dimensional propensity score (hdPS) methods in the adjustment for confounding by indication remains unclear. We aimed to identify which method provided the best adjustment for confounding by indication within the c...
Autores principales: | Guertin, Jason R., Rahme, Elham, Dormuth, Colin R., LeLorier, Jacques |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26891796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0119-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Performance of the high-dimensional propensity score in adjusting for unmeasured confounders
por: Guertin, Jason R, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score
por: Austin, Peter C
Publicado: (2014) -
Comparison of channel sampling methods and brush heads in surveillance culture of endoscope reprocessing: A propensity score matching and paired study
por: Ji, Xue-Yue, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Propensity Score Method for Partially Matched Omics Studies
por: Kuan, Pei-Fen
Publicado: (2014) -
An overview of propensity score matching methods for clustered
data
por: Langworthy, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)