Cargando…
Clinical Trials in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
Branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) is the second most common retinal vascular disorder. The management of macular edema has changed considerably over time. The laser is considered the gold standard treatment for over two decades. However, visual recovery with laser is usually slow and incomplete....
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26957837 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.172294 |
_version_ | 1782416807683948544 |
---|---|
author | Panakanti, Tandava Krishnan Chhablani, Jay |
author_facet | Panakanti, Tandava Krishnan Chhablani, Jay |
author_sort | Panakanti, Tandava Krishnan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) is the second most common retinal vascular disorder. The management of macular edema has changed considerably over time. The laser is considered the gold standard treatment for over two decades. However, visual recovery with laser is usually slow and incomplete. The advent of intravitreal agents, specifically anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) have heralded a new era which promises rapid recovery of vision and quality of vision. Randomized clinical trials have reported optimal results with anti-VEGF agents (ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and aflibercept) compared to laser therapy or steroids. However, nearly 50% of the patients require repeat intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy up to 4 years after initiating therapy to sustain the visual gains. The adverse events (systemic and ocular) of these agents are minimal. Monotherapy with anti-VEGF agents have been found to provide better results than any combination with laser. This review article summarizes evidence from randomized controlled trials evaluating treatment options for the treatment of macular edema secondary to BRVO with a special focus on anti-VEGF therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4759902 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47599022016-03-08 Clinical Trials in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion Panakanti, Tandava Krishnan Chhablani, Jay Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol Updates in Clinical Trials in Retina Branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) is the second most common retinal vascular disorder. The management of macular edema has changed considerably over time. The laser is considered the gold standard treatment for over two decades. However, visual recovery with laser is usually slow and incomplete. The advent of intravitreal agents, specifically anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) have heralded a new era which promises rapid recovery of vision and quality of vision. Randomized clinical trials have reported optimal results with anti-VEGF agents (ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and aflibercept) compared to laser therapy or steroids. However, nearly 50% of the patients require repeat intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy up to 4 years after initiating therapy to sustain the visual gains. The adverse events (systemic and ocular) of these agents are minimal. Monotherapy with anti-VEGF agents have been found to provide better results than any combination with laser. This review article summarizes evidence from randomized controlled trials evaluating treatment options for the treatment of macular edema secondary to BRVO with a special focus on anti-VEGF therapy. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4759902/ /pubmed/26957837 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.172294 Text en Copyright: © Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Updates in Clinical Trials in Retina Panakanti, Tandava Krishnan Chhablani, Jay Clinical Trials in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion |
title | Clinical Trials in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion |
title_full | Clinical Trials in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion |
title_fullStr | Clinical Trials in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Trials in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion |
title_short | Clinical Trials in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion |
title_sort | clinical trials in branch retinal vein occlusion |
topic | Updates in Clinical Trials in Retina |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26957837 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.172294 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT panakantitandavakrishnan clinicaltrialsinbranchretinalveinocclusion AT chhablanijay clinicaltrialsinbranchretinalveinocclusion |