Cargando…

Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composites

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to investigate the influence of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composite resins. BACKGROUND: Different shapes of polishing systems are available according to the site of work. To minimize variability, a new system with single shape is d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Brijesh, Chhabra, Naveen, Jain, Disha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4760010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26957791
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.173192
_version_ 1782416829562486784
author Patel, Brijesh
Chhabra, Naveen
Jain, Disha
author_facet Patel, Brijesh
Chhabra, Naveen
Jain, Disha
author_sort Patel, Brijesh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to investigate the influence of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composite resins. BACKGROUND: Different shapes of polishing systems are available according to the site of work. To minimize variability, a new system with single shape is developed that can be utilized in both anterior as well as posterior teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy composite discs were fabricated using Teflon well (10 mm × 3 mm). Two main group of nano-hybrid composite Group I — Filtek Z350 and Group II — Tetric N-Ceram were used (n = 35 for each group). Both groups were further divided into four subgroups. Subgroup a — OneGloss (n = 10), Subgroup b - PoGo (n = 10), Subgroup c — Sof-Lex spiral (n = 10), Subgroup d - Mylar strip (control, n = 5). Samples were polished according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Surface roughness test was performed using contact profilometer. The obtained data were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance test. RESULT: Tetric N-Ceram produced smoother surfaces than Filtek Z350 (P < 0.05). Mylar strip and “PoGo” created equally smooth surfaces, while significantly rougher surfaces were obtained after applications of “Sof-Lex spiral” and “OneGloss” (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Polishing ability of Tetric N-Ceram is better than Filtek Z350 XT. “PoGo” seems to be a better polishing system than “OneGloss” and “Sof-Lex Spiral.”
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4760010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47600102016-03-08 Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composites Patel, Brijesh Chhabra, Naveen Jain, Disha J Conserv Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to investigate the influence of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composite resins. BACKGROUND: Different shapes of polishing systems are available according to the site of work. To minimize variability, a new system with single shape is developed that can be utilized in both anterior as well as posterior teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy composite discs were fabricated using Teflon well (10 mm × 3 mm). Two main group of nano-hybrid composite Group I — Filtek Z350 and Group II — Tetric N-Ceram were used (n = 35 for each group). Both groups were further divided into four subgroups. Subgroup a — OneGloss (n = 10), Subgroup b - PoGo (n = 10), Subgroup c — Sof-Lex spiral (n = 10), Subgroup d - Mylar strip (control, n = 5). Samples were polished according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Surface roughness test was performed using contact profilometer. The obtained data were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance test. RESULT: Tetric N-Ceram produced smoother surfaces than Filtek Z350 (P < 0.05). Mylar strip and “PoGo” created equally smooth surfaces, while significantly rougher surfaces were obtained after applications of “Sof-Lex spiral” and “OneGloss” (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Polishing ability of Tetric N-Ceram is better than Filtek Z350 XT. “PoGo” seems to be a better polishing system than “OneGloss” and “Sof-Lex Spiral.” Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4760010/ /pubmed/26957791 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.173192 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Patel, Brijesh
Chhabra, Naveen
Jain, Disha
Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composites
title Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composites
title_full Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composites
title_fullStr Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composites
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composites
title_short Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composites
title_sort effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composites
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4760010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26957791
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.173192
work_keys_str_mv AT patelbrijesh effectofdifferentpolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessofnanohybridcomposites
AT chhabranaveen effectofdifferentpolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessofnanohybridcomposites
AT jaindisha effectofdifferentpolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessofnanohybridcomposites