Cargando…
Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composites
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to investigate the influence of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composite resins. BACKGROUND: Different shapes of polishing systems are available according to the site of work. To minimize variability, a new system with single shape is d...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4760010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26957791 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.173192 |
_version_ | 1782416829562486784 |
---|---|
author | Patel, Brijesh Chhabra, Naveen Jain, Disha |
author_facet | Patel, Brijesh Chhabra, Naveen Jain, Disha |
author_sort | Patel, Brijesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to investigate the influence of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composite resins. BACKGROUND: Different shapes of polishing systems are available according to the site of work. To minimize variability, a new system with single shape is developed that can be utilized in both anterior as well as posterior teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy composite discs were fabricated using Teflon well (10 mm × 3 mm). Two main group of nano-hybrid composite Group I — Filtek Z350 and Group II — Tetric N-Ceram were used (n = 35 for each group). Both groups were further divided into four subgroups. Subgroup a — OneGloss (n = 10), Subgroup b - PoGo (n = 10), Subgroup c — Sof-Lex spiral (n = 10), Subgroup d - Mylar strip (control, n = 5). Samples were polished according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Surface roughness test was performed using contact profilometer. The obtained data were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance test. RESULT: Tetric N-Ceram produced smoother surfaces than Filtek Z350 (P < 0.05). Mylar strip and “PoGo” created equally smooth surfaces, while significantly rougher surfaces were obtained after applications of “Sof-Lex spiral” and “OneGloss” (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Polishing ability of Tetric N-Ceram is better than Filtek Z350 XT. “PoGo” seems to be a better polishing system than “OneGloss” and “Sof-Lex Spiral.” |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4760010 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47600102016-03-08 Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composites Patel, Brijesh Chhabra, Naveen Jain, Disha J Conserv Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to investigate the influence of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composite resins. BACKGROUND: Different shapes of polishing systems are available according to the site of work. To minimize variability, a new system with single shape is developed that can be utilized in both anterior as well as posterior teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy composite discs were fabricated using Teflon well (10 mm × 3 mm). Two main group of nano-hybrid composite Group I — Filtek Z350 and Group II — Tetric N-Ceram were used (n = 35 for each group). Both groups were further divided into four subgroups. Subgroup a — OneGloss (n = 10), Subgroup b - PoGo (n = 10), Subgroup c — Sof-Lex spiral (n = 10), Subgroup d - Mylar strip (control, n = 5). Samples were polished according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Surface roughness test was performed using contact profilometer. The obtained data were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance test. RESULT: Tetric N-Ceram produced smoother surfaces than Filtek Z350 (P < 0.05). Mylar strip and “PoGo” created equally smooth surfaces, while significantly rougher surfaces were obtained after applications of “Sof-Lex spiral” and “OneGloss” (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Polishing ability of Tetric N-Ceram is better than Filtek Z350 XT. “PoGo” seems to be a better polishing system than “OneGloss” and “Sof-Lex Spiral.” Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4760010/ /pubmed/26957791 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.173192 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Patel, Brijesh Chhabra, Naveen Jain, Disha Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composites |
title | Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composites |
title_full | Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composites |
title_fullStr | Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composites |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composites |
title_short | Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composites |
title_sort | effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composites |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4760010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26957791 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.173192 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patelbrijesh effectofdifferentpolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessofnanohybridcomposites AT chhabranaveen effectofdifferentpolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessofnanohybridcomposites AT jaindisha effectofdifferentpolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessofnanohybridcomposites |