Cargando…
The efficacy of the Self-Adjusting File versus WaveOne in removal of root filling residue that remains in oval canals after the use of ProTaper retreatment files: A cone-beam computed tomography study
AIM: The current ex vivo study compared the efficacy of removing root fillings using ProTaper retreatment files followed by either WaveOne reciprocating file or the Self-Adjusting File (SAF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty maxillary canines with single oval root canal were selected and sectioned to ob...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4760020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26957798 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.173204 |
_version_ | 1782416831781273600 |
---|---|
author | Pawar, Ajinkya M Thakur, Bhagyashree Metzger, Zvi Kfir, Anda Pawar, Mansing |
author_facet | Pawar, Ajinkya M Thakur, Bhagyashree Metzger, Zvi Kfir, Anda Pawar, Mansing |
author_sort | Pawar, Ajinkya M |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The current ex vivo study compared the efficacy of removing root fillings using ProTaper retreatment files followed by either WaveOne reciprocating file or the Self-Adjusting File (SAF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty maxillary canines with single oval root canal were selected and sectioned to obtain 18-mm root segments. The root canals were instrumented with WaveOne primary files, followed by obturation using warm lateral compaction, and the sealer was allowed to fully set. The teeth were then divided into two equal groups (N = 20). Initial removal of the bulk of root filling material was performed with ProTaper retreatment files, followed by either WaveOne files (Group 1) or SAF (Group 2). Endosolv R was used as a gutta-percha softener. Preoperative and postoperative high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to measure the volume of the root filling residue that was left after the procedure. Statistical analysis was performed using t-test. RESULTS: The mean volume of root filling residue in Group 1 was 9.4 (±0.5) mm(3), whereas in Group 2 the residue volume was 2.6 (±0.4) mm(3), (P < 0.001; t-test). CONCLUSIONS: When SAF was used after ProTaper retreatment files, significantly less root filling residue was left in the canals compared to when WaveOne was used. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4760020 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47600202016-03-08 The efficacy of the Self-Adjusting File versus WaveOne in removal of root filling residue that remains in oval canals after the use of ProTaper retreatment files: A cone-beam computed tomography study Pawar, Ajinkya M Thakur, Bhagyashree Metzger, Zvi Kfir, Anda Pawar, Mansing J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The current ex vivo study compared the efficacy of removing root fillings using ProTaper retreatment files followed by either WaveOne reciprocating file or the Self-Adjusting File (SAF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty maxillary canines with single oval root canal were selected and sectioned to obtain 18-mm root segments. The root canals were instrumented with WaveOne primary files, followed by obturation using warm lateral compaction, and the sealer was allowed to fully set. The teeth were then divided into two equal groups (N = 20). Initial removal of the bulk of root filling material was performed with ProTaper retreatment files, followed by either WaveOne files (Group 1) or SAF (Group 2). Endosolv R was used as a gutta-percha softener. Preoperative and postoperative high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to measure the volume of the root filling residue that was left after the procedure. Statistical analysis was performed using t-test. RESULTS: The mean volume of root filling residue in Group 1 was 9.4 (±0.5) mm(3), whereas in Group 2 the residue volume was 2.6 (±0.4) mm(3), (P < 0.001; t-test). CONCLUSIONS: When SAF was used after ProTaper retreatment files, significantly less root filling residue was left in the canals compared to when WaveOne was used. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4760020/ /pubmed/26957798 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.173204 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Pawar, Ajinkya M Thakur, Bhagyashree Metzger, Zvi Kfir, Anda Pawar, Mansing The efficacy of the Self-Adjusting File versus WaveOne in removal of root filling residue that remains in oval canals after the use of ProTaper retreatment files: A cone-beam computed tomography study |
title | The efficacy of the Self-Adjusting File versus WaveOne in removal of root filling residue that remains in oval canals after the use of ProTaper retreatment files: A cone-beam computed tomography study |
title_full | The efficacy of the Self-Adjusting File versus WaveOne in removal of root filling residue that remains in oval canals after the use of ProTaper retreatment files: A cone-beam computed tomography study |
title_fullStr | The efficacy of the Self-Adjusting File versus WaveOne in removal of root filling residue that remains in oval canals after the use of ProTaper retreatment files: A cone-beam computed tomography study |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy of the Self-Adjusting File versus WaveOne in removal of root filling residue that remains in oval canals after the use of ProTaper retreatment files: A cone-beam computed tomography study |
title_short | The efficacy of the Self-Adjusting File versus WaveOne in removal of root filling residue that remains in oval canals after the use of ProTaper retreatment files: A cone-beam computed tomography study |
title_sort | efficacy of the self-adjusting file versus waveone in removal of root filling residue that remains in oval canals after the use of protaper retreatment files: a cone-beam computed tomography study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4760020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26957798 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.173204 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pawarajinkyam theefficacyoftheselfadjustingfileversuswaveoneinremovalofrootfillingresiduethatremainsinovalcanalsaftertheuseofprotaperretreatmentfilesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy AT thakurbhagyashree theefficacyoftheselfadjustingfileversuswaveoneinremovalofrootfillingresiduethatremainsinovalcanalsaftertheuseofprotaperretreatmentfilesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy AT metzgerzvi theefficacyoftheselfadjustingfileversuswaveoneinremovalofrootfillingresiduethatremainsinovalcanalsaftertheuseofprotaperretreatmentfilesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy AT kfiranda theefficacyoftheselfadjustingfileversuswaveoneinremovalofrootfillingresiduethatremainsinovalcanalsaftertheuseofprotaperretreatmentfilesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy AT pawarmansing theefficacyoftheselfadjustingfileversuswaveoneinremovalofrootfillingresiduethatremainsinovalcanalsaftertheuseofprotaperretreatmentfilesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy AT pawarajinkyam efficacyoftheselfadjustingfileversuswaveoneinremovalofrootfillingresiduethatremainsinovalcanalsaftertheuseofprotaperretreatmentfilesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy AT thakurbhagyashree efficacyoftheselfadjustingfileversuswaveoneinremovalofrootfillingresiduethatremainsinovalcanalsaftertheuseofprotaperretreatmentfilesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy AT metzgerzvi efficacyoftheselfadjustingfileversuswaveoneinremovalofrootfillingresiduethatremainsinovalcanalsaftertheuseofprotaperretreatmentfilesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy AT kfiranda efficacyoftheselfadjustingfileversuswaveoneinremovalofrootfillingresiduethatremainsinovalcanalsaftertheuseofprotaperretreatmentfilesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy AT pawarmansing efficacyoftheselfadjustingfileversuswaveoneinremovalofrootfillingresiduethatremainsinovalcanalsaftertheuseofprotaperretreatmentfilesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy |