Cargando…

Comparison of abdominal ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in detection of necrotic debris in walled-off pancreatic necrosis

Background: Walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) is an important complication of acute pancreatitis that is diagnosed by imaging modalities such as endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which can clearly visualize necrotic debris. The effectiveness of abdominal ultrasound...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rana, Surinder S, Chaudhary, Vinita, Sharma, Ravi, Sharma, Vishal, Chhabra, Puneet, Bhasin, Deepak K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4760061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25573950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gou088
_version_ 1782416841051734016
author Rana, Surinder S
Chaudhary, Vinita
Sharma, Ravi
Sharma, Vishal
Chhabra, Puneet
Bhasin, Deepak K
author_facet Rana, Surinder S
Chaudhary, Vinita
Sharma, Ravi
Sharma, Vishal
Chhabra, Puneet
Bhasin, Deepak K
author_sort Rana, Surinder S
collection PubMed
description Background: Walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) is an important complication of acute pancreatitis that is diagnosed by imaging modalities such as endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which can clearly visualize necrotic debris. The effectiveness of abdominal ultrasound (USG) in detecting solid debris in WOPN is not clear. Methods: A total of 52 patients (37 males, mean age 38.9 ± 12.6 years) with symptomatic WOPN were prospectively studied using EUS, MRI and USG. These investigations were done at a mean of 11.7 ± 5.5 weeks of onset of acute pancreatitis and within two days. Results: WOPN was detected by EUS & MRI in all patients, whereas USG could not detect it in 4 (7.6%) patients (3 had predominantly solid WOPN, whereas one had air foci in WOPN). USG, MRI and EUS could detect solid debris in all patients with detectable WOPN. EUS and USG detected <10% debris in 10 (20%) patients, whereas MRI detected <10% debris in 14 (27%) patients. EUS and USG detected 10–40% debris in 33 patients whereas MRI detected 10–40% debris in 30 (58%) patients. More than 40% debris was better characterized on EUS and MRI with both detecting >40% debris in 8 patients (15%) compared to 5 (11%) patients having >40% debris on USG. EUS detected collaterals around WOPN that were not detected on USG or MRI. Conclusion: USG can characterize the majority of WOPN, with accuracy comparable to that of EUS/MRI. However its limitations are the inability to detect collaterals around WOPN and characterize collections with high solid content or air.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4760061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47600612016-02-22 Comparison of abdominal ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in detection of necrotic debris in walled-off pancreatic necrosis Rana, Surinder S Chaudhary, Vinita Sharma, Ravi Sharma, Vishal Chhabra, Puneet Bhasin, Deepak K Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) Original Articles Background: Walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) is an important complication of acute pancreatitis that is diagnosed by imaging modalities such as endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which can clearly visualize necrotic debris. The effectiveness of abdominal ultrasound (USG) in detecting solid debris in WOPN is not clear. Methods: A total of 52 patients (37 males, mean age 38.9 ± 12.6 years) with symptomatic WOPN were prospectively studied using EUS, MRI and USG. These investigations were done at a mean of 11.7 ± 5.5 weeks of onset of acute pancreatitis and within two days. Results: WOPN was detected by EUS & MRI in all patients, whereas USG could not detect it in 4 (7.6%) patients (3 had predominantly solid WOPN, whereas one had air foci in WOPN). USG, MRI and EUS could detect solid debris in all patients with detectable WOPN. EUS and USG detected <10% debris in 10 (20%) patients, whereas MRI detected <10% debris in 14 (27%) patients. EUS and USG detected 10–40% debris in 33 patients whereas MRI detected 10–40% debris in 30 (58%) patients. More than 40% debris was better characterized on EUS and MRI with both detecting >40% debris in 8 patients (15%) compared to 5 (11%) patients having >40% debris on USG. EUS detected collaterals around WOPN that were not detected on USG or MRI. Conclusion: USG can characterize the majority of WOPN, with accuracy comparable to that of EUS/MRI. However its limitations are the inability to detect collaterals around WOPN and characterize collections with high solid content or air. Oxford University Press 2016-02 2015-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4760061/ /pubmed/25573950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gou088 Text en © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Oxford University Press and the Digestive Science Publishing Co. Limited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Rana, Surinder S
Chaudhary, Vinita
Sharma, Ravi
Sharma, Vishal
Chhabra, Puneet
Bhasin, Deepak K
Comparison of abdominal ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in detection of necrotic debris in walled-off pancreatic necrosis
title Comparison of abdominal ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in detection of necrotic debris in walled-off pancreatic necrosis
title_full Comparison of abdominal ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in detection of necrotic debris in walled-off pancreatic necrosis
title_fullStr Comparison of abdominal ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in detection of necrotic debris in walled-off pancreatic necrosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of abdominal ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in detection of necrotic debris in walled-off pancreatic necrosis
title_short Comparison of abdominal ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in detection of necrotic debris in walled-off pancreatic necrosis
title_sort comparison of abdominal ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in detection of necrotic debris in walled-off pancreatic necrosis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4760061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25573950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gou088
work_keys_str_mv AT ranasurinders comparisonofabdominalultrasoundendoscopicultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimagingindetectionofnecroticdebrisinwalledoffpancreaticnecrosis
AT chaudharyvinita comparisonofabdominalultrasoundendoscopicultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimagingindetectionofnecroticdebrisinwalledoffpancreaticnecrosis
AT sharmaravi comparisonofabdominalultrasoundendoscopicultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimagingindetectionofnecroticdebrisinwalledoffpancreaticnecrosis
AT sharmavishal comparisonofabdominalultrasoundendoscopicultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimagingindetectionofnecroticdebrisinwalledoffpancreaticnecrosis
AT chhabrapuneet comparisonofabdominalultrasoundendoscopicultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimagingindetectionofnecroticdebrisinwalledoffpancreaticnecrosis
AT bhasindeepakk comparisonofabdominalultrasoundendoscopicultrasoundandmagneticresonanceimagingindetectionofnecroticdebrisinwalledoffpancreaticnecrosis