Cargando…

Biological trade and markets

Cooperation between organisms can often be understood, like trade between merchants, as a mutually beneficial exchange of services, resources or other ‘commodities’. Mutual benefits alone, however, are not sufficient to explain the evolution of trade-based cooperation. First, organisms may reject a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hammerstein, Peter, Noë, Ronald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4760201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26729940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0101
_version_ 1782416851808026624
author Hammerstein, Peter
Noë, Ronald
author_facet Hammerstein, Peter
Noë, Ronald
author_sort Hammerstein, Peter
collection PubMed
description Cooperation between organisms can often be understood, like trade between merchants, as a mutually beneficial exchange of services, resources or other ‘commodities’. Mutual benefits alone, however, are not sufficient to explain the evolution of trade-based cooperation. First, organisms may reject a particular trade if another partner offers a better deal. Second, while human trade often entails binding contracts, non-human trade requires unwritten ‘terms of contract’ that ‘self-stabilize’ trade and prevent cheating even if all traders strive to maximize fitness. Whenever trading partners can be chosen, market-like situations arise in nature that biologists studying cooperation need to account for. The mere possibility of exerting partner choice stabilizes many forms of otherwise cheatable trade, induces competition, facilitates the evolution of specialization and often leads to intricate forms of cooperation. We discuss selected examples to illustrate these general points and review basic conceptual approaches that are important in the theory of biological trade and markets. Comparing these approaches with theory in economics, it turns out that conventional models—often called ‘Walrasian’ markets—are of limited relevance to biology. In contrast, early approaches to trade and markets, as found in the works of Ricardo and Cournot, contain elements of thought that have inspired useful models in biology. For example, the concept of comparative advantage has biological applications in trade, signalling and ecological competition. We also see convergence between post-Walrasian economics and biological markets. For example, both economists and biologists are studying ‘principal–agent’ problems with principals offering jobs to agents without being sure that the agents will do a proper job. Finally, we show that mating markets have many peculiarities not shared with conventional economic markets. Ideas from economics are useful for biologists studying cooperation but need to be taken with caution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4760201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47602012016-03-04 Biological trade and markets Hammerstein, Peter Noë, Ronald Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Part II: Animal Cooperation Based on Direct Fitness Benefits Cooperation between organisms can often be understood, like trade between merchants, as a mutually beneficial exchange of services, resources or other ‘commodities’. Mutual benefits alone, however, are not sufficient to explain the evolution of trade-based cooperation. First, organisms may reject a particular trade if another partner offers a better deal. Second, while human trade often entails binding contracts, non-human trade requires unwritten ‘terms of contract’ that ‘self-stabilize’ trade and prevent cheating even if all traders strive to maximize fitness. Whenever trading partners can be chosen, market-like situations arise in nature that biologists studying cooperation need to account for. The mere possibility of exerting partner choice stabilizes many forms of otherwise cheatable trade, induces competition, facilitates the evolution of specialization and often leads to intricate forms of cooperation. We discuss selected examples to illustrate these general points and review basic conceptual approaches that are important in the theory of biological trade and markets. Comparing these approaches with theory in economics, it turns out that conventional models—often called ‘Walrasian’ markets—are of limited relevance to biology. In contrast, early approaches to trade and markets, as found in the works of Ricardo and Cournot, contain elements of thought that have inspired useful models in biology. For example, the concept of comparative advantage has biological applications in trade, signalling and ecological competition. We also see convergence between post-Walrasian economics and biological markets. For example, both economists and biologists are studying ‘principal–agent’ problems with principals offering jobs to agents without being sure that the agents will do a proper job. Finally, we show that mating markets have many peculiarities not shared with conventional economic markets. Ideas from economics are useful for biologists studying cooperation but need to be taken with caution. The Royal Society 2016-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4760201/ /pubmed/26729940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0101 Text en © 2016 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Part II: Animal Cooperation Based on Direct Fitness Benefits
Hammerstein, Peter
Noë, Ronald
Biological trade and markets
title Biological trade and markets
title_full Biological trade and markets
title_fullStr Biological trade and markets
title_full_unstemmed Biological trade and markets
title_short Biological trade and markets
title_sort biological trade and markets
topic Part II: Animal Cooperation Based on Direct Fitness Benefits
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4760201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26729940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0101
work_keys_str_mv AT hammersteinpeter biologicaltradeandmarkets
AT noeronald biologicaltradeandmarkets