Cargando…
The efficacy and safety of urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different bulking agents for treating urinary incontinence in women, a systematic review including only randomized controlled trials was performed. The subjects were women with urinary incontinence. The primary outcomes were clinical and urodynamic parameters....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4760362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26934239 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2016(02)08 |
_version_ | 1782416862014865408 |
---|---|
author | Matsuoka, Priscila Katsumi Locali, Rafael Fagionato Pacetta, Aparecida Maria Baracat, Edmund Chada Haddad, Jorge Milhem |
author_facet | Matsuoka, Priscila Katsumi Locali, Rafael Fagionato Pacetta, Aparecida Maria Baracat, Edmund Chada Haddad, Jorge Milhem |
author_sort | Matsuoka, Priscila Katsumi |
collection | PubMed |
description | To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different bulking agents for treating urinary incontinence in women, a systematic review including only randomized controlled trials was performed. The subjects were women with urinary incontinence. The primary outcomes were clinical and urodynamic parameters. The results were presented as a weighted mean difference for non-continuous variables and as relative risk for continuous variables, both with 95% confidence intervals. Initially, 942 studies were identified. However, only fourteen eligible trials fulfilled the prerequisites. Altogether, the review included 1814 patients in trials of eight different types of bulking agents, and all studies were described and analyzed. The measured outcomes were evaluated using a large variety of instruments. The most common complications of the bulking agents were urinary retention and urinary tract infection. Additionally, there were certain major complications, such as one case of death after use of autologous fat. However, the lack of adequate studies, the heterogeneous populations studied, the wide variety of materials used and the lack of long-term follow-up limit guidance of practice. To determine which substance is the most suitable, there is a need for more randomized clinical trials that compare existing bulking agents based on standardized clinical outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4760362 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47603622016-02-25 The efficacy and safety of urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review Matsuoka, Priscila Katsumi Locali, Rafael Fagionato Pacetta, Aparecida Maria Baracat, Edmund Chada Haddad, Jorge Milhem Clinics (Sao Paulo) Review To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different bulking agents for treating urinary incontinence in women, a systematic review including only randomized controlled trials was performed. The subjects were women with urinary incontinence. The primary outcomes were clinical and urodynamic parameters. The results were presented as a weighted mean difference for non-continuous variables and as relative risk for continuous variables, both with 95% confidence intervals. Initially, 942 studies were identified. However, only fourteen eligible trials fulfilled the prerequisites. Altogether, the review included 1814 patients in trials of eight different types of bulking agents, and all studies were described and analyzed. The measured outcomes were evaluated using a large variety of instruments. The most common complications of the bulking agents were urinary retention and urinary tract infection. Additionally, there were certain major complications, such as one case of death after use of autologous fat. However, the lack of adequate studies, the heterogeneous populations studied, the wide variety of materials used and the lack of long-term follow-up limit guidance of practice. To determine which substance is the most suitable, there is a need for more randomized clinical trials that compare existing bulking agents based on standardized clinical outcomes. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2016-02 2016-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4760362/ /pubmed/26934239 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2016(02)08 Text en Copyright © 2016 CLINICS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Matsuoka, Priscila Katsumi Locali, Rafael Fagionato Pacetta, Aparecida Maria Baracat, Edmund Chada Haddad, Jorge Milhem The efficacy and safety of urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review |
title | The efficacy and safety of urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review |
title_full | The efficacy and safety of urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | The efficacy and safety of urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy and safety of urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review |
title_short | The efficacy and safety of urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4760362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26934239 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2016(02)08 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matsuokapriscilakatsumi theefficacyandsafetyofurethralinjectiontherapyforurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreview AT localirafaelfagionato theefficacyandsafetyofurethralinjectiontherapyforurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreview AT pacettaaparecidamaria theefficacyandsafetyofurethralinjectiontherapyforurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreview AT baracatedmundchada theefficacyandsafetyofurethralinjectiontherapyforurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreview AT haddadjorgemilhem theefficacyandsafetyofurethralinjectiontherapyforurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreview AT matsuokapriscilakatsumi efficacyandsafetyofurethralinjectiontherapyforurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreview AT localirafaelfagionato efficacyandsafetyofurethralinjectiontherapyforurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreview AT pacettaaparecidamaria efficacyandsafetyofurethralinjectiontherapyforurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreview AT baracatedmundchada efficacyandsafetyofurethralinjectiontherapyforurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreview AT haddadjorgemilhem efficacyandsafetyofurethralinjectiontherapyforurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreview |