Cargando…

The efficacy and safety of urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different bulking agents for treating urinary incontinence in women, a systematic review including only randomized controlled trials was performed. The subjects were women with urinary incontinence. The primary outcomes were clinical and urodynamic parameters....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsuoka, Priscila Katsumi, Locali, Rafael Fagionato, Pacetta, Aparecida Maria, Baracat, Edmund Chada, Haddad, Jorge Milhem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4760362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26934239
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2016(02)08
_version_ 1782416862014865408
author Matsuoka, Priscila Katsumi
Locali, Rafael Fagionato
Pacetta, Aparecida Maria
Baracat, Edmund Chada
Haddad, Jorge Milhem
author_facet Matsuoka, Priscila Katsumi
Locali, Rafael Fagionato
Pacetta, Aparecida Maria
Baracat, Edmund Chada
Haddad, Jorge Milhem
author_sort Matsuoka, Priscila Katsumi
collection PubMed
description To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different bulking agents for treating urinary incontinence in women, a systematic review including only randomized controlled trials was performed. The subjects were women with urinary incontinence. The primary outcomes were clinical and urodynamic parameters. The results were presented as a weighted mean difference for non-continuous variables and as relative risk for continuous variables, both with 95% confidence intervals. Initially, 942 studies were identified. However, only fourteen eligible trials fulfilled the prerequisites. Altogether, the review included 1814 patients in trials of eight different types of bulking agents, and all studies were described and analyzed. The measured outcomes were evaluated using a large variety of instruments. The most common complications of the bulking agents were urinary retention and urinary tract infection. Additionally, there were certain major complications, such as one case of death after use of autologous fat. However, the lack of adequate studies, the heterogeneous populations studied, the wide variety of materials used and the lack of long-term follow-up limit guidance of practice. To determine which substance is the most suitable, there is a need for more randomized clinical trials that compare existing bulking agents based on standardized clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4760362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47603622016-02-25 The efficacy and safety of urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review Matsuoka, Priscila Katsumi Locali, Rafael Fagionato Pacetta, Aparecida Maria Baracat, Edmund Chada Haddad, Jorge Milhem Clinics (Sao Paulo) Review To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different bulking agents for treating urinary incontinence in women, a systematic review including only randomized controlled trials was performed. The subjects were women with urinary incontinence. The primary outcomes were clinical and urodynamic parameters. The results were presented as a weighted mean difference for non-continuous variables and as relative risk for continuous variables, both with 95% confidence intervals. Initially, 942 studies were identified. However, only fourteen eligible trials fulfilled the prerequisites. Altogether, the review included 1814 patients in trials of eight different types of bulking agents, and all studies were described and analyzed. The measured outcomes were evaluated using a large variety of instruments. The most common complications of the bulking agents were urinary retention and urinary tract infection. Additionally, there were certain major complications, such as one case of death after use of autologous fat. However, the lack of adequate studies, the heterogeneous populations studied, the wide variety of materials used and the lack of long-term follow-up limit guidance of practice. To determine which substance is the most suitable, there is a need for more randomized clinical trials that compare existing bulking agents based on standardized clinical outcomes. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2016-02 2016-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4760362/ /pubmed/26934239 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2016(02)08 Text en Copyright © 2016 CLINICS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Matsuoka, Priscila Katsumi
Locali, Rafael Fagionato
Pacetta, Aparecida Maria
Baracat, Edmund Chada
Haddad, Jorge Milhem
The efficacy and safety of urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review
title The efficacy and safety of urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review
title_full The efficacy and safety of urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review
title_short The efficacy and safety of urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review
title_sort efficacy and safety of urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4760362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26934239
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2016(02)08
work_keys_str_mv AT matsuokapriscilakatsumi theefficacyandsafetyofurethralinjectiontherapyforurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreview
AT localirafaelfagionato theefficacyandsafetyofurethralinjectiontherapyforurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreview
AT pacettaaparecidamaria theefficacyandsafetyofurethralinjectiontherapyforurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreview
AT baracatedmundchada theefficacyandsafetyofurethralinjectiontherapyforurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreview
AT haddadjorgemilhem theefficacyandsafetyofurethralinjectiontherapyforurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreview
AT matsuokapriscilakatsumi efficacyandsafetyofurethralinjectiontherapyforurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreview
AT localirafaelfagionato efficacyandsafetyofurethralinjectiontherapyforurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreview
AT pacettaaparecidamaria efficacyandsafetyofurethralinjectiontherapyforurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreview
AT baracatedmundchada efficacyandsafetyofurethralinjectiontherapyforurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreview
AT haddadjorgemilhem efficacyandsafetyofurethralinjectiontherapyforurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreview