Cargando…

Irreversible Electroporation (IRE): Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria for Analysis and Comparison

BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) as newer ablation modality has been introduced and its clinical niche is under investigation. At present just one IRE system has been approved for clinical use and is currently commercially available (NanoKnife® system). In 2014, the International Worki...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wendler, Johann J., Fischbach, Katharina, Ricke, Jens, Jürgens, Julian, Fischbach, Frank, Köllermann, Jens, Porsch, Markus, Baumunk, Daniel, Schostak, Martin, Liehr, Uwe-Bernd, Pech, Maciej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4760650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26966472
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.896034
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) as newer ablation modality has been introduced and its clinical niche is under investigation. At present just one IRE system has been approved for clinical use and is currently commercially available (NanoKnife® system). In 2014, the International Working Group on Image-Guided Tumor Ablation updated the recommendation about standardization of terms and reporting criteria for image-guided tumor ablation. The IRE method is not covered in detail. But the non-thermal IRE method and the NanoKnife System differ fundamentally from established ablations techniques, especially thermal approaches, e.g. radio frequency ablation (RFA). MATERIAL/METHODS: As numerous publications on IRE with varying terminology exist so far – with numbers continuously increasing – standardized terms and reporting criteria of IRE are needed urgently. The use of standardized terminology may then allow for a better inter-study comparison of the methodology applied as well as results achieved. RESULTS: Thus, the main objective of this document is to supplement the updated recommendation for image-guided tumor ablation by outlining a standardized set of terminology for the IRE procedure with the NanoKnife Sytem as well as address essential clinical and technical informations that should be provided when reporting on IRE tumor ablation. CONCLUSIONS: We emphasize that the usage of all above recommended reporting criteria and terms can make IRE ablation reports comparable and provide treatment transparency to assess the current value of IRE and provide further development.