Cargando…
Irreversible Electroporation (IRE): Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria for Analysis and Comparison
BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) as newer ablation modality has been introduced and its clinical niche is under investigation. At present just one IRE system has been approved for clinical use and is currently commercially available (NanoKnife® system). In 2014, the International Worki...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4760650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26966472 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.896034 |
_version_ | 1782416882633015296 |
---|---|
author | Wendler, Johann J. Fischbach, Katharina Ricke, Jens Jürgens, Julian Fischbach, Frank Köllermann, Jens Porsch, Markus Baumunk, Daniel Schostak, Martin Liehr, Uwe-Bernd Pech, Maciej |
author_facet | Wendler, Johann J. Fischbach, Katharina Ricke, Jens Jürgens, Julian Fischbach, Frank Köllermann, Jens Porsch, Markus Baumunk, Daniel Schostak, Martin Liehr, Uwe-Bernd Pech, Maciej |
author_sort | Wendler, Johann J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) as newer ablation modality has been introduced and its clinical niche is under investigation. At present just one IRE system has been approved for clinical use and is currently commercially available (NanoKnife® system). In 2014, the International Working Group on Image-Guided Tumor Ablation updated the recommendation about standardization of terms and reporting criteria for image-guided tumor ablation. The IRE method is not covered in detail. But the non-thermal IRE method and the NanoKnife System differ fundamentally from established ablations techniques, especially thermal approaches, e.g. radio frequency ablation (RFA). MATERIAL/METHODS: As numerous publications on IRE with varying terminology exist so far – with numbers continuously increasing – standardized terms and reporting criteria of IRE are needed urgently. The use of standardized terminology may then allow for a better inter-study comparison of the methodology applied as well as results achieved. RESULTS: Thus, the main objective of this document is to supplement the updated recommendation for image-guided tumor ablation by outlining a standardized set of terminology for the IRE procedure with the NanoKnife Sytem as well as address essential clinical and technical informations that should be provided when reporting on IRE tumor ablation. CONCLUSIONS: We emphasize that the usage of all above recommended reporting criteria and terms can make IRE ablation reports comparable and provide treatment transparency to assess the current value of IRE and provide further development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4760650 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47606502016-03-10 Irreversible Electroporation (IRE): Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria for Analysis and Comparison Wendler, Johann J. Fischbach, Katharina Ricke, Jens Jürgens, Julian Fischbach, Frank Köllermann, Jens Porsch, Markus Baumunk, Daniel Schostak, Martin Liehr, Uwe-Bernd Pech, Maciej Pol J Radiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) as newer ablation modality has been introduced and its clinical niche is under investigation. At present just one IRE system has been approved for clinical use and is currently commercially available (NanoKnife® system). In 2014, the International Working Group on Image-Guided Tumor Ablation updated the recommendation about standardization of terms and reporting criteria for image-guided tumor ablation. The IRE method is not covered in detail. But the non-thermal IRE method and the NanoKnife System differ fundamentally from established ablations techniques, especially thermal approaches, e.g. radio frequency ablation (RFA). MATERIAL/METHODS: As numerous publications on IRE with varying terminology exist so far – with numbers continuously increasing – standardized terms and reporting criteria of IRE are needed urgently. The use of standardized terminology may then allow for a better inter-study comparison of the methodology applied as well as results achieved. RESULTS: Thus, the main objective of this document is to supplement the updated recommendation for image-guided tumor ablation by outlining a standardized set of terminology for the IRE procedure with the NanoKnife Sytem as well as address essential clinical and technical informations that should be provided when reporting on IRE tumor ablation. CONCLUSIONS: We emphasize that the usage of all above recommended reporting criteria and terms can make IRE ablation reports comparable and provide treatment transparency to assess the current value of IRE and provide further development. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2016-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4760650/ /pubmed/26966472 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.896034 Text en © Pol J Radiol, 2016 This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wendler, Johann J. Fischbach, Katharina Ricke, Jens Jürgens, Julian Fischbach, Frank Köllermann, Jens Porsch, Markus Baumunk, Daniel Schostak, Martin Liehr, Uwe-Bernd Pech, Maciej Irreversible Electroporation (IRE): Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria for Analysis and Comparison |
title | Irreversible Electroporation (IRE): Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria for Analysis and Comparison |
title_full | Irreversible Electroporation (IRE): Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria for Analysis and Comparison |
title_fullStr | Irreversible Electroporation (IRE): Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria for Analysis and Comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Irreversible Electroporation (IRE): Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria for Analysis and Comparison |
title_short | Irreversible Electroporation (IRE): Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria for Analysis and Comparison |
title_sort | irreversible electroporation (ire): standardization of terminology and reporting criteria for analysis and comparison |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4760650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26966472 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.896034 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wendlerjohannj irreversibleelectroporationirestandardizationofterminologyandreportingcriteriaforanalysisandcomparison AT fischbachkatharina irreversibleelectroporationirestandardizationofterminologyandreportingcriteriaforanalysisandcomparison AT rickejens irreversibleelectroporationirestandardizationofterminologyandreportingcriteriaforanalysisandcomparison AT jurgensjulian irreversibleelectroporationirestandardizationofterminologyandreportingcriteriaforanalysisandcomparison AT fischbachfrank irreversibleelectroporationirestandardizationofterminologyandreportingcriteriaforanalysisandcomparison AT kollermannjens irreversibleelectroporationirestandardizationofterminologyandreportingcriteriaforanalysisandcomparison AT porschmarkus irreversibleelectroporationirestandardizationofterminologyandreportingcriteriaforanalysisandcomparison AT baumunkdaniel irreversibleelectroporationirestandardizationofterminologyandreportingcriteriaforanalysisandcomparison AT schostakmartin irreversibleelectroporationirestandardizationofterminologyandreportingcriteriaforanalysisandcomparison AT liehruwebernd irreversibleelectroporationirestandardizationofterminologyandreportingcriteriaforanalysisandcomparison AT pechmaciej irreversibleelectroporationirestandardizationofterminologyandreportingcriteriaforanalysisandcomparison |