Cargando…

Irreversible Electroporation (IRE): Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria for Analysis and Comparison

BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) as newer ablation modality has been introduced and its clinical niche is under investigation. At present just one IRE system has been approved for clinical use and is currently commercially available (NanoKnife® system). In 2014, the International Worki...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wendler, Johann J., Fischbach, Katharina, Ricke, Jens, Jürgens, Julian, Fischbach, Frank, Köllermann, Jens, Porsch, Markus, Baumunk, Daniel, Schostak, Martin, Liehr, Uwe-Bernd, Pech, Maciej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4760650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26966472
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.896034
_version_ 1782416882633015296
author Wendler, Johann J.
Fischbach, Katharina
Ricke, Jens
Jürgens, Julian
Fischbach, Frank
Köllermann, Jens
Porsch, Markus
Baumunk, Daniel
Schostak, Martin
Liehr, Uwe-Bernd
Pech, Maciej
author_facet Wendler, Johann J.
Fischbach, Katharina
Ricke, Jens
Jürgens, Julian
Fischbach, Frank
Köllermann, Jens
Porsch, Markus
Baumunk, Daniel
Schostak, Martin
Liehr, Uwe-Bernd
Pech, Maciej
author_sort Wendler, Johann J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) as newer ablation modality has been introduced and its clinical niche is under investigation. At present just one IRE system has been approved for clinical use and is currently commercially available (NanoKnife® system). In 2014, the International Working Group on Image-Guided Tumor Ablation updated the recommendation about standardization of terms and reporting criteria for image-guided tumor ablation. The IRE method is not covered in detail. But the non-thermal IRE method and the NanoKnife System differ fundamentally from established ablations techniques, especially thermal approaches, e.g. radio frequency ablation (RFA). MATERIAL/METHODS: As numerous publications on IRE with varying terminology exist so far – with numbers continuously increasing – standardized terms and reporting criteria of IRE are needed urgently. The use of standardized terminology may then allow for a better inter-study comparison of the methodology applied as well as results achieved. RESULTS: Thus, the main objective of this document is to supplement the updated recommendation for image-guided tumor ablation by outlining a standardized set of terminology for the IRE procedure with the NanoKnife Sytem as well as address essential clinical and technical informations that should be provided when reporting on IRE tumor ablation. CONCLUSIONS: We emphasize that the usage of all above recommended reporting criteria and terms can make IRE ablation reports comparable and provide treatment transparency to assess the current value of IRE and provide further development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4760650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47606502016-03-10 Irreversible Electroporation (IRE): Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria for Analysis and Comparison Wendler, Johann J. Fischbach, Katharina Ricke, Jens Jürgens, Julian Fischbach, Frank Köllermann, Jens Porsch, Markus Baumunk, Daniel Schostak, Martin Liehr, Uwe-Bernd Pech, Maciej Pol J Radiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) as newer ablation modality has been introduced and its clinical niche is under investigation. At present just one IRE system has been approved for clinical use and is currently commercially available (NanoKnife® system). In 2014, the International Working Group on Image-Guided Tumor Ablation updated the recommendation about standardization of terms and reporting criteria for image-guided tumor ablation. The IRE method is not covered in detail. But the non-thermal IRE method and the NanoKnife System differ fundamentally from established ablations techniques, especially thermal approaches, e.g. radio frequency ablation (RFA). MATERIAL/METHODS: As numerous publications on IRE with varying terminology exist so far – with numbers continuously increasing – standardized terms and reporting criteria of IRE are needed urgently. The use of standardized terminology may then allow for a better inter-study comparison of the methodology applied as well as results achieved. RESULTS: Thus, the main objective of this document is to supplement the updated recommendation for image-guided tumor ablation by outlining a standardized set of terminology for the IRE procedure with the NanoKnife Sytem as well as address essential clinical and technical informations that should be provided when reporting on IRE tumor ablation. CONCLUSIONS: We emphasize that the usage of all above recommended reporting criteria and terms can make IRE ablation reports comparable and provide treatment transparency to assess the current value of IRE and provide further development. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2016-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4760650/ /pubmed/26966472 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.896034 Text en © Pol J Radiol, 2016 This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wendler, Johann J.
Fischbach, Katharina
Ricke, Jens
Jürgens, Julian
Fischbach, Frank
Köllermann, Jens
Porsch, Markus
Baumunk, Daniel
Schostak, Martin
Liehr, Uwe-Bernd
Pech, Maciej
Irreversible Electroporation (IRE): Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria for Analysis and Comparison
title Irreversible Electroporation (IRE): Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria for Analysis and Comparison
title_full Irreversible Electroporation (IRE): Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria for Analysis and Comparison
title_fullStr Irreversible Electroporation (IRE): Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria for Analysis and Comparison
title_full_unstemmed Irreversible Electroporation (IRE): Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria for Analysis and Comparison
title_short Irreversible Electroporation (IRE): Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria for Analysis and Comparison
title_sort irreversible electroporation (ire): standardization of terminology and reporting criteria for analysis and comparison
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4760650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26966472
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.896034
work_keys_str_mv AT wendlerjohannj irreversibleelectroporationirestandardizationofterminologyandreportingcriteriaforanalysisandcomparison
AT fischbachkatharina irreversibleelectroporationirestandardizationofterminologyandreportingcriteriaforanalysisandcomparison
AT rickejens irreversibleelectroporationirestandardizationofterminologyandreportingcriteriaforanalysisandcomparison
AT jurgensjulian irreversibleelectroporationirestandardizationofterminologyandreportingcriteriaforanalysisandcomparison
AT fischbachfrank irreversibleelectroporationirestandardizationofterminologyandreportingcriteriaforanalysisandcomparison
AT kollermannjens irreversibleelectroporationirestandardizationofterminologyandreportingcriteriaforanalysisandcomparison
AT porschmarkus irreversibleelectroporationirestandardizationofterminologyandreportingcriteriaforanalysisandcomparison
AT baumunkdaniel irreversibleelectroporationirestandardizationofterminologyandreportingcriteriaforanalysisandcomparison
AT schostakmartin irreversibleelectroporationirestandardizationofterminologyandreportingcriteriaforanalysisandcomparison
AT liehruwebernd irreversibleelectroporationirestandardizationofterminologyandreportingcriteriaforanalysisandcomparison
AT pechmaciej irreversibleelectroporationirestandardizationofterminologyandreportingcriteriaforanalysisandcomparison