Cargando…

Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study

BACKGROUND: In 2008, the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) began funding a major 5-year pilot research programme of translational research in England, establishing nine ‘Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care’ (CLAHRCs). A number of evaluations were carried out...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heaton, Janet, Day, Jo, Britten, Nicky
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4761144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26897169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0383-9
_version_ 1782416936437547008
author Heaton, Janet
Day, Jo
Britten, Nicky
author_facet Heaton, Janet
Day, Jo
Britten, Nicky
author_sort Heaton, Janet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2008, the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) began funding a major 5-year pilot research programme of translational research in England, establishing nine ‘Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care’ (CLAHRCs). A number of evaluations were carried out to examine whether or not the various collaborations worked as intended and why. In this paper, we examine what the theory of co-production adds to understanding of processes of knowledge creation and translation we observed in one of the CLAHRCs. METHODS: A case study of a successful knowledge translation project was identified from our wider realist evaluation of the mechanisms of closer collaboration at play in the CLAHRC. In the project, a computer simulation model of an emergency pathway for acute ischaemic stroke was built to explore if and how the time between the onset and treatment of the condition could be minimised by redesigning the pathway. The aim of the case study was to improve our understanding of the nature and workings of the mechanisms of closer collaboration that were associated with the more successful projects by examining the relevance of the theory of co-production. Qualitative methods of analysis were used to explore the fit between the mechanisms of closer collaboration we observed in the realist evaluation and the principles of co-production we identified from the literature. RESULTS: We found a close fit between the nine mechanisms of closer collaboration at work in the project and the principles of co-production (active agents; equality of partners; reciprocity and mutuality; transformative; and facilitated). The successful style of collaborative working exemplified by the project was consistent with a strong form of co-production. CONCLUSIONS: In our view, the theory of co-production provides useful insights into what it is about the qualities of collaborative working that inspire the requisite mechanisms for generating knowledge that is translated into practice. The theory provides a potentially useful basis for future knowledge translation programmes and projects in applied health research in a range of contexts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4761144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47611442016-02-21 Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study Heaton, Janet Day, Jo Britten, Nicky Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: In 2008, the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) began funding a major 5-year pilot research programme of translational research in England, establishing nine ‘Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care’ (CLAHRCs). A number of evaluations were carried out to examine whether or not the various collaborations worked as intended and why. In this paper, we examine what the theory of co-production adds to understanding of processes of knowledge creation and translation we observed in one of the CLAHRCs. METHODS: A case study of a successful knowledge translation project was identified from our wider realist evaluation of the mechanisms of closer collaboration at play in the CLAHRC. In the project, a computer simulation model of an emergency pathway for acute ischaemic stroke was built to explore if and how the time between the onset and treatment of the condition could be minimised by redesigning the pathway. The aim of the case study was to improve our understanding of the nature and workings of the mechanisms of closer collaboration that were associated with the more successful projects by examining the relevance of the theory of co-production. Qualitative methods of analysis were used to explore the fit between the mechanisms of closer collaboration we observed in the realist evaluation and the principles of co-production we identified from the literature. RESULTS: We found a close fit between the nine mechanisms of closer collaboration at work in the project and the principles of co-production (active agents; equality of partners; reciprocity and mutuality; transformative; and facilitated). The successful style of collaborative working exemplified by the project was consistent with a strong form of co-production. CONCLUSIONS: In our view, the theory of co-production provides useful insights into what it is about the qualities of collaborative working that inspire the requisite mechanisms for generating knowledge that is translated into practice. The theory provides a potentially useful basis for future knowledge translation programmes and projects in applied health research in a range of contexts. BioMed Central 2016-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4761144/ /pubmed/26897169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0383-9 Text en © Heaton et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Heaton, Janet
Day, Jo
Britten, Nicky
Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study
title Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study
title_full Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study
title_fullStr Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study
title_full_unstemmed Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study
title_short Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study
title_sort collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4761144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26897169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0383-9
work_keys_str_mv AT heatonjanet collaborativeresearchandthecoproductionofknowledgeforpracticeanillustrativecasestudy
AT dayjo collaborativeresearchandthecoproductionofknowledgeforpracticeanillustrativecasestudy
AT brittennicky collaborativeresearchandthecoproductionofknowledgeforpracticeanillustrativecasestudy