Cargando…

Systematic reviews in paediatric multiple sclerosis and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease exemplify shortcomings in methods used to evaluate therapies in rare conditions

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard design of clinical research to assess interventions. However, RCTs cannot always be applied for practical or ethical reasons. To investigate the current practices in rare diseases, we review evaluations of therapeutic intervention...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Unkel, Steffen, Röver, Christian, Stallard, Nigel, Benda, Norbert, Posch, Martin, Zohar, Sarah, Friede, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4761188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26897367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0402-6
_version_ 1782416946433622016
author Unkel, Steffen
Röver, Christian
Stallard, Nigel
Benda, Norbert
Posch, Martin
Zohar, Sarah
Friede, Tim
author_facet Unkel, Steffen
Röver, Christian
Stallard, Nigel
Benda, Norbert
Posch, Martin
Zohar, Sarah
Friede, Tim
author_sort Unkel, Steffen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard design of clinical research to assess interventions. However, RCTs cannot always be applied for practical or ethical reasons. To investigate the current practices in rare diseases, we review evaluations of therapeutic interventions in paediatric multiple sclerosis (MS) and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD). In particular, we shed light on the endpoints used, the study designs implemented and the statistical methodologies applied. METHODS: We conducted literature searches to identify relevant primary studies. Data on study design, objectives, endpoints, patient characteristics, randomization and masking, type of intervention, control, withdrawals and statistical methodology were extracted from the selected studies. The risk of bias and the quality of the studies were assessed. RESULTS: Twelve (seven) primary studies on paediatric MS (CJD) were included in the qualitative synthesis. No double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial for evaluating interventions in paediatric MS has been published yet. Evidence from one open-label RCT is available. The observational studies are before-after studies or controlled studies. Three of the seven selected studies on CJD are RCTs, of which two received the maximum mark on the Oxford Quality Scale. Four trials are controlled observational studies. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from double-blind RCTs on the efficacy of treatments appears to be variable between rare diseases. With regard to paediatric conditions it remains to be seen what impact regulators will have through e.g., paediatric investigation plans. Overall, there is space for improvement by using innovative trial designs and data analysis techniques. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13023-016-0402-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4761188
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47611882016-02-21 Systematic reviews in paediatric multiple sclerosis and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease exemplify shortcomings in methods used to evaluate therapies in rare conditions Unkel, Steffen Röver, Christian Stallard, Nigel Benda, Norbert Posch, Martin Zohar, Sarah Friede, Tim Orphanet J Rare Dis Research BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard design of clinical research to assess interventions. However, RCTs cannot always be applied for practical or ethical reasons. To investigate the current practices in rare diseases, we review evaluations of therapeutic interventions in paediatric multiple sclerosis (MS) and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD). In particular, we shed light on the endpoints used, the study designs implemented and the statistical methodologies applied. METHODS: We conducted literature searches to identify relevant primary studies. Data on study design, objectives, endpoints, patient characteristics, randomization and masking, type of intervention, control, withdrawals and statistical methodology were extracted from the selected studies. The risk of bias and the quality of the studies were assessed. RESULTS: Twelve (seven) primary studies on paediatric MS (CJD) were included in the qualitative synthesis. No double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial for evaluating interventions in paediatric MS has been published yet. Evidence from one open-label RCT is available. The observational studies are before-after studies or controlled studies. Three of the seven selected studies on CJD are RCTs, of which two received the maximum mark on the Oxford Quality Scale. Four trials are controlled observational studies. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from double-blind RCTs on the efficacy of treatments appears to be variable between rare diseases. With regard to paediatric conditions it remains to be seen what impact regulators will have through e.g., paediatric investigation plans. Overall, there is space for improvement by using innovative trial designs and data analysis techniques. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13023-016-0402-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4761188/ /pubmed/26897367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0402-6 Text en © Unkel et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Unkel, Steffen
Röver, Christian
Stallard, Nigel
Benda, Norbert
Posch, Martin
Zohar, Sarah
Friede, Tim
Systematic reviews in paediatric multiple sclerosis and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease exemplify shortcomings in methods used to evaluate therapies in rare conditions
title Systematic reviews in paediatric multiple sclerosis and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease exemplify shortcomings in methods used to evaluate therapies in rare conditions
title_full Systematic reviews in paediatric multiple sclerosis and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease exemplify shortcomings in methods used to evaluate therapies in rare conditions
title_fullStr Systematic reviews in paediatric multiple sclerosis and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease exemplify shortcomings in methods used to evaluate therapies in rare conditions
title_full_unstemmed Systematic reviews in paediatric multiple sclerosis and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease exemplify shortcomings in methods used to evaluate therapies in rare conditions
title_short Systematic reviews in paediatric multiple sclerosis and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease exemplify shortcomings in methods used to evaluate therapies in rare conditions
title_sort systematic reviews in paediatric multiple sclerosis and creutzfeldt-jakob disease exemplify shortcomings in methods used to evaluate therapies in rare conditions
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4761188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26897367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0402-6
work_keys_str_mv AT unkelsteffen systematicreviewsinpaediatricmultiplesclerosisandcreutzfeldtjakobdiseaseexemplifyshortcomingsinmethodsusedtoevaluatetherapiesinrareconditions
AT roverchristian systematicreviewsinpaediatricmultiplesclerosisandcreutzfeldtjakobdiseaseexemplifyshortcomingsinmethodsusedtoevaluatetherapiesinrareconditions
AT stallardnigel systematicreviewsinpaediatricmultiplesclerosisandcreutzfeldtjakobdiseaseexemplifyshortcomingsinmethodsusedtoevaluatetherapiesinrareconditions
AT bendanorbert systematicreviewsinpaediatricmultiplesclerosisandcreutzfeldtjakobdiseaseexemplifyshortcomingsinmethodsusedtoevaluatetherapiesinrareconditions
AT poschmartin systematicreviewsinpaediatricmultiplesclerosisandcreutzfeldtjakobdiseaseexemplifyshortcomingsinmethodsusedtoevaluatetherapiesinrareconditions
AT zoharsarah systematicreviewsinpaediatricmultiplesclerosisandcreutzfeldtjakobdiseaseexemplifyshortcomingsinmethodsusedtoevaluatetherapiesinrareconditions
AT friedetim systematicreviewsinpaediatricmultiplesclerosisandcreutzfeldtjakobdiseaseexemplifyshortcomingsinmethodsusedtoevaluatetherapiesinrareconditions