Cargando…
FEA model analysis of the effects of the stress distribution of saddle-type implants on the alveolar bone and the structural/physical stability of implants
BACKGROUND: As dental implants receive masticatory stress, the distribution of stress is very important to peri-implant bone homeostasis and implant survival. In this report, we created a saddle-type implant and analyzed its stability and ability to distribute stress to the surrounding bone. METHODS...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4761364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-016-0054-4 |
_version_ | 1782416966345031680 |
---|---|
author | Kong, Yoon Soo Park, Jun Woo Choi, Dong Ju |
author_facet | Kong, Yoon Soo Park, Jun Woo Choi, Dong Ju |
author_sort | Kong, Yoon Soo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As dental implants receive masticatory stress, the distribution of stress is very important to peri-implant bone homeostasis and implant survival. In this report, we created a saddle-type implant and analyzed its stability and ability to distribute stress to the surrounding bone. METHODS: The implants were designed as a saddle-type implant (SI) that wrapped around the alveolar bone, and the sizes of the saddles were 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, and 5.5 mm. The X and Y displacement were compared to clarify the effects of the saddle structures. The control group consisted of dental implants without the saddle design (CI). Using finite element modeling (FEM), the stress distribution around the dental implants was analyzed. RESULTS: With saddle-type implants, saddles longer than 4.5 mm were more effective for stress distribution than CI. Regarding lateral displacement, a SI of 2.5 mm was effective for stress distribution compared to lateral displacement. ASI that was 5.6 mm in length was more effective for stress distribution than a CI that was 10 mm in length. CONCLUSIONS: The saddle-type implant could have a bone-gaining effect. Because it has stress-distributing effects, it might protect the newly formed bone under the implant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4761364 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47613642016-03-01 FEA model analysis of the effects of the stress distribution of saddle-type implants on the alveolar bone and the structural/physical stability of implants Kong, Yoon Soo Park, Jun Woo Choi, Dong Ju Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg Research BACKGROUND: As dental implants receive masticatory stress, the distribution of stress is very important to peri-implant bone homeostasis and implant survival. In this report, we created a saddle-type implant and analyzed its stability and ability to distribute stress to the surrounding bone. METHODS: The implants were designed as a saddle-type implant (SI) that wrapped around the alveolar bone, and the sizes of the saddles were 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, and 5.5 mm. The X and Y displacement were compared to clarify the effects of the saddle structures. The control group consisted of dental implants without the saddle design (CI). Using finite element modeling (FEM), the stress distribution around the dental implants was analyzed. RESULTS: With saddle-type implants, saddles longer than 4.5 mm were more effective for stress distribution than CI. Regarding lateral displacement, a SI of 2.5 mm was effective for stress distribution compared to lateral displacement. ASI that was 5.6 mm in length was more effective for stress distribution than a CI that was 10 mm in length. CONCLUSIONS: The saddle-type implant could have a bone-gaining effect. Because it has stress-distributing effects, it might protect the newly formed bone under the implant. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4761364/ /pubmed/26942164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-016-0054-4 Text en © Kong et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Kong, Yoon Soo Park, Jun Woo Choi, Dong Ju FEA model analysis of the effects of the stress distribution of saddle-type implants on the alveolar bone and the structural/physical stability of implants |
title | FEA model analysis of the effects of the stress distribution of saddle-type implants on the alveolar bone and the structural/physical stability of implants |
title_full | FEA model analysis of the effects of the stress distribution of saddle-type implants on the alveolar bone and the structural/physical stability of implants |
title_fullStr | FEA model analysis of the effects of the stress distribution of saddle-type implants on the alveolar bone and the structural/physical stability of implants |
title_full_unstemmed | FEA model analysis of the effects of the stress distribution of saddle-type implants on the alveolar bone and the structural/physical stability of implants |
title_short | FEA model analysis of the effects of the stress distribution of saddle-type implants on the alveolar bone and the structural/physical stability of implants |
title_sort | fea model analysis of the effects of the stress distribution of saddle-type implants on the alveolar bone and the structural/physical stability of implants |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4761364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-016-0054-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kongyoonsoo feamodelanalysisoftheeffectsofthestressdistributionofsaddletypeimplantsonthealveolarboneandthestructuralphysicalstabilityofimplants AT parkjunwoo feamodelanalysisoftheeffectsofthestressdistributionofsaddletypeimplantsonthealveolarboneandthestructuralphysicalstabilityofimplants AT choidongju feamodelanalysisoftheeffectsofthestressdistributionofsaddletypeimplantsonthealveolarboneandthestructuralphysicalstabilityofimplants |