Cargando…
Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading
Gough and Tunmer’s (1986) simple view of reading (SVR) proposed that reading comprehension (RC) is a function of language comprehension (LC) and word recognition/decoding. Braze et al. (2007) presented data suggesting an extension of the SVR in which knowledge of vocabulary (V) affected RC over and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4761369/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26941478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9608-6 |
_version_ | 1782416967278264320 |
---|---|
author | Braze, David Katz, Leonard Magnuson, James S. Mencl, W. Einar Tabor, Whitney Van Dyke, Julie A. Gong, Tao Johns, Clinton L. Shankweiler, Donald P. |
author_facet | Braze, David Katz, Leonard Magnuson, James S. Mencl, W. Einar Tabor, Whitney Van Dyke, Julie A. Gong, Tao Johns, Clinton L. Shankweiler, Donald P. |
author_sort | Braze, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gough and Tunmer’s (1986) simple view of reading (SVR) proposed that reading comprehension (RC) is a function of language comprehension (LC) and word recognition/decoding. Braze et al. (2007) presented data suggesting an extension of the SVR in which knowledge of vocabulary (V) affected RC over and above the effects of LC. Tunmer and Chapman (2012) found a similar independent contribution of V to RC when the data were analyzed by hierarchical regression. However, additional analysis by factor analysis and structural equation modeling indicated that the effect of V on RC was, in fact, completely captured by LC itself and there was no need to posit a separate direct effect of V on RC. In the present study, we present new data from young adults with sub-optimal reading skill (N = 286). Latent variable and regression analyses support Gough and Tunmer’s original proposal and the conclusions of Tunmer and Chapman that V can be considered a component of LC and not an independent contributor to RC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4761369 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47613692016-03-01 Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading Braze, David Katz, Leonard Magnuson, James S. Mencl, W. Einar Tabor, Whitney Van Dyke, Julie A. Gong, Tao Johns, Clinton L. Shankweiler, Donald P. Read Writ Article Gough and Tunmer’s (1986) simple view of reading (SVR) proposed that reading comprehension (RC) is a function of language comprehension (LC) and word recognition/decoding. Braze et al. (2007) presented data suggesting an extension of the SVR in which knowledge of vocabulary (V) affected RC over and above the effects of LC. Tunmer and Chapman (2012) found a similar independent contribution of V to RC when the data were analyzed by hierarchical regression. However, additional analysis by factor analysis and structural equation modeling indicated that the effect of V on RC was, in fact, completely captured by LC itself and there was no need to posit a separate direct effect of V on RC. In the present study, we present new data from young adults with sub-optimal reading skill (N = 286). Latent variable and regression analyses support Gough and Tunmer’s original proposal and the conclusions of Tunmer and Chapman that V can be considered a component of LC and not an independent contributor to RC. Springer Netherlands 2015-12-17 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4761369/ /pubmed/26941478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9608-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Braze, David Katz, Leonard Magnuson, James S. Mencl, W. Einar Tabor, Whitney Van Dyke, Julie A. Gong, Tao Johns, Clinton L. Shankweiler, Donald P. Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading |
title | Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading |
title_full | Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading |
title_fullStr | Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading |
title_full_unstemmed | Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading |
title_short | Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading |
title_sort | vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4761369/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26941478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9608-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brazedavid vocabularydoesnotcomplicatethesimpleviewofreading AT katzleonard vocabularydoesnotcomplicatethesimpleviewofreading AT magnusonjamess vocabularydoesnotcomplicatethesimpleviewofreading AT menclweinar vocabularydoesnotcomplicatethesimpleviewofreading AT taborwhitney vocabularydoesnotcomplicatethesimpleviewofreading AT vandykejuliea vocabularydoesnotcomplicatethesimpleviewofreading AT gongtao vocabularydoesnotcomplicatethesimpleviewofreading AT johnsclintonl vocabularydoesnotcomplicatethesimpleviewofreading AT shankweilerdonaldp vocabularydoesnotcomplicatethesimpleviewofreading |