Cargando…

Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading

Gough and Tunmer’s (1986) simple view of reading (SVR) proposed that reading comprehension (RC) is a function of language comprehension (LC) and word recognition/decoding. Braze et al. (2007) presented data suggesting an extension of the SVR in which knowledge of vocabulary (V) affected RC over and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Braze, David, Katz, Leonard, Magnuson, James S., Mencl, W. Einar, Tabor, Whitney, Van Dyke, Julie A., Gong, Tao, Johns, Clinton L., Shankweiler, Donald P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4761369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26941478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9608-6
_version_ 1782416967278264320
author Braze, David
Katz, Leonard
Magnuson, James S.
Mencl, W. Einar
Tabor, Whitney
Van Dyke, Julie A.
Gong, Tao
Johns, Clinton L.
Shankweiler, Donald P.
author_facet Braze, David
Katz, Leonard
Magnuson, James S.
Mencl, W. Einar
Tabor, Whitney
Van Dyke, Julie A.
Gong, Tao
Johns, Clinton L.
Shankweiler, Donald P.
author_sort Braze, David
collection PubMed
description Gough and Tunmer’s (1986) simple view of reading (SVR) proposed that reading comprehension (RC) is a function of language comprehension (LC) and word recognition/decoding. Braze et al. (2007) presented data suggesting an extension of the SVR in which knowledge of vocabulary (V) affected RC over and above the effects of LC. Tunmer and Chapman (2012) found a similar independent contribution of V to RC when the data were analyzed by hierarchical regression. However, additional analysis by factor analysis and structural equation modeling indicated that the effect of V on RC was, in fact, completely captured by LC itself and there was no need to posit a separate direct effect of V on RC. In the present study, we present new data from young adults with sub-optimal reading skill (N = 286). Latent variable and regression analyses support Gough and Tunmer’s original proposal and the conclusions of Tunmer and Chapman that V can be considered a component of LC and not an independent contributor to RC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4761369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47613692016-03-01 Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading Braze, David Katz, Leonard Magnuson, James S. Mencl, W. Einar Tabor, Whitney Van Dyke, Julie A. Gong, Tao Johns, Clinton L. Shankweiler, Donald P. Read Writ Article Gough and Tunmer’s (1986) simple view of reading (SVR) proposed that reading comprehension (RC) is a function of language comprehension (LC) and word recognition/decoding. Braze et al. (2007) presented data suggesting an extension of the SVR in which knowledge of vocabulary (V) affected RC over and above the effects of LC. Tunmer and Chapman (2012) found a similar independent contribution of V to RC when the data were analyzed by hierarchical regression. However, additional analysis by factor analysis and structural equation modeling indicated that the effect of V on RC was, in fact, completely captured by LC itself and there was no need to posit a separate direct effect of V on RC. In the present study, we present new data from young adults with sub-optimal reading skill (N = 286). Latent variable and regression analyses support Gough and Tunmer’s original proposal and the conclusions of Tunmer and Chapman that V can be considered a component of LC and not an independent contributor to RC. Springer Netherlands 2015-12-17 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4761369/ /pubmed/26941478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9608-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Braze, David
Katz, Leonard
Magnuson, James S.
Mencl, W. Einar
Tabor, Whitney
Van Dyke, Julie A.
Gong, Tao
Johns, Clinton L.
Shankweiler, Donald P.
Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading
title Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading
title_full Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading
title_fullStr Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading
title_full_unstemmed Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading
title_short Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading
title_sort vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4761369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26941478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9608-6
work_keys_str_mv AT brazedavid vocabularydoesnotcomplicatethesimpleviewofreading
AT katzleonard vocabularydoesnotcomplicatethesimpleviewofreading
AT magnusonjamess vocabularydoesnotcomplicatethesimpleviewofreading
AT menclweinar vocabularydoesnotcomplicatethesimpleviewofreading
AT taborwhitney vocabularydoesnotcomplicatethesimpleviewofreading
AT vandykejuliea vocabularydoesnotcomplicatethesimpleviewofreading
AT gongtao vocabularydoesnotcomplicatethesimpleviewofreading
AT johnsclintonl vocabularydoesnotcomplicatethesimpleviewofreading
AT shankweilerdonaldp vocabularydoesnotcomplicatethesimpleviewofreading