Cargando…

To senesce or not to senesce: how primary human fibroblasts decide their cell fate after DNA damage

Excessive DNA damage can induce an irreversible cell cycle arrest, called senescence, which is generally perceived as an important tumour-suppressor mechanism. However, it is unclear how cells decide whether to senesce or not after DNA damage. By combining experimental data with a parameterized math...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kollarovic, Gabriel, Studencka, Maja, Ivanova, Lyubomira, Lauenstein, Claudia, Heinze, Kristina, Lapytsko, Anastasiya, Talemi, Soheil Rastgou, Figueiredo, Ana Sofia, Schaber, Jörg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4761720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26830321
_version_ 1782417004821479424
author Kollarovic, Gabriel
Studencka, Maja
Ivanova, Lyubomira
Lauenstein, Claudia
Heinze, Kristina
Lapytsko, Anastasiya
Talemi, Soheil Rastgou
Figueiredo, Ana Sofia
Schaber, Jörg
author_facet Kollarovic, Gabriel
Studencka, Maja
Ivanova, Lyubomira
Lauenstein, Claudia
Heinze, Kristina
Lapytsko, Anastasiya
Talemi, Soheil Rastgou
Figueiredo, Ana Sofia
Schaber, Jörg
author_sort Kollarovic, Gabriel
collection PubMed
description Excessive DNA damage can induce an irreversible cell cycle arrest, called senescence, which is generally perceived as an important tumour-suppressor mechanism. However, it is unclear how cells decide whether to senesce or not after DNA damage. By combining experimental data with a parameterized mathematical model we elucidate this cell fate decision at the G1-S transition. Our model provides a quantitative and conceptually new understanding of how human fibroblasts decide whether DNA damage is beyond repair and senesce. Model and data imply that the G1-S transition is regulated by a bistable hysteresis switch with respect to Cdk2 activity, which in turn is controlled by the Cdk2/p21 ratio rather than cyclin abundance. We experimentally confirm the resulting predictions that to induce senescence i) in healthy cells both high initial and elevated background DNA damage are necessary and sufficient, and ii) in already damaged cells much lower additional DNA damage is sufficient. Our study provides a mechanistic explanation of a) how noise in protein abundances allows cells to overcome the G1-S arrest even with substantial DNA damage, potentially leading to neoplasia, and b) how accumulating DNA damage with age increasingly sensitizes cells for senescence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4761720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47617202016-03-11 To senesce or not to senesce: how primary human fibroblasts decide their cell fate after DNA damage Kollarovic, Gabriel Studencka, Maja Ivanova, Lyubomira Lauenstein, Claudia Heinze, Kristina Lapytsko, Anastasiya Talemi, Soheil Rastgou Figueiredo, Ana Sofia Schaber, Jörg Aging (Albany NY) Research Paper Excessive DNA damage can induce an irreversible cell cycle arrest, called senescence, which is generally perceived as an important tumour-suppressor mechanism. However, it is unclear how cells decide whether to senesce or not after DNA damage. By combining experimental data with a parameterized mathematical model we elucidate this cell fate decision at the G1-S transition. Our model provides a quantitative and conceptually new understanding of how human fibroblasts decide whether DNA damage is beyond repair and senesce. Model and data imply that the G1-S transition is regulated by a bistable hysteresis switch with respect to Cdk2 activity, which in turn is controlled by the Cdk2/p21 ratio rather than cyclin abundance. We experimentally confirm the resulting predictions that to induce senescence i) in healthy cells both high initial and elevated background DNA damage are necessary and sufficient, and ii) in already damaged cells much lower additional DNA damage is sufficient. Our study provides a mechanistic explanation of a) how noise in protein abundances allows cells to overcome the G1-S arrest even with substantial DNA damage, potentially leading to neoplasia, and b) how accumulating DNA damage with age increasingly sensitizes cells for senescence. Impact Journals LLC 2016-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4761720/ /pubmed/26830321 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Kollarovic et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Kollarovic, Gabriel
Studencka, Maja
Ivanova, Lyubomira
Lauenstein, Claudia
Heinze, Kristina
Lapytsko, Anastasiya
Talemi, Soheil Rastgou
Figueiredo, Ana Sofia
Schaber, Jörg
To senesce or not to senesce: how primary human fibroblasts decide their cell fate after DNA damage
title To senesce or not to senesce: how primary human fibroblasts decide their cell fate after DNA damage
title_full To senesce or not to senesce: how primary human fibroblasts decide their cell fate after DNA damage
title_fullStr To senesce or not to senesce: how primary human fibroblasts decide their cell fate after DNA damage
title_full_unstemmed To senesce or not to senesce: how primary human fibroblasts decide their cell fate after DNA damage
title_short To senesce or not to senesce: how primary human fibroblasts decide their cell fate after DNA damage
title_sort to senesce or not to senesce: how primary human fibroblasts decide their cell fate after dna damage
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4761720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26830321
work_keys_str_mv AT kollarovicgabriel tosenesceornottosenescehowprimaryhumanfibroblastsdecidetheircellfateafterdnadamage
AT studenckamaja tosenesceornottosenescehowprimaryhumanfibroblastsdecidetheircellfateafterdnadamage
AT ivanovalyubomira tosenesceornottosenescehowprimaryhumanfibroblastsdecidetheircellfateafterdnadamage
AT lauensteinclaudia tosenesceornottosenescehowprimaryhumanfibroblastsdecidetheircellfateafterdnadamage
AT heinzekristina tosenesceornottosenescehowprimaryhumanfibroblastsdecidetheircellfateafterdnadamage
AT lapytskoanastasiya tosenesceornottosenescehowprimaryhumanfibroblastsdecidetheircellfateafterdnadamage
AT talemisoheilrastgou tosenesceornottosenescehowprimaryhumanfibroblastsdecidetheircellfateafterdnadamage
AT figueiredoanasofia tosenesceornottosenescehowprimaryhumanfibroblastsdecidetheircellfateafterdnadamage
AT schaberjorg tosenesceornottosenescehowprimaryhumanfibroblastsdecidetheircellfateafterdnadamage