Cargando…
To senesce or not to senesce: how primary human fibroblasts decide their cell fate after DNA damage
Excessive DNA damage can induce an irreversible cell cycle arrest, called senescence, which is generally perceived as an important tumour-suppressor mechanism. However, it is unclear how cells decide whether to senesce or not after DNA damage. By combining experimental data with a parameterized math...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4761720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26830321 |
_version_ | 1782417004821479424 |
---|---|
author | Kollarovic, Gabriel Studencka, Maja Ivanova, Lyubomira Lauenstein, Claudia Heinze, Kristina Lapytsko, Anastasiya Talemi, Soheil Rastgou Figueiredo, Ana Sofia Schaber, Jörg |
author_facet | Kollarovic, Gabriel Studencka, Maja Ivanova, Lyubomira Lauenstein, Claudia Heinze, Kristina Lapytsko, Anastasiya Talemi, Soheil Rastgou Figueiredo, Ana Sofia Schaber, Jörg |
author_sort | Kollarovic, Gabriel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Excessive DNA damage can induce an irreversible cell cycle arrest, called senescence, which is generally perceived as an important tumour-suppressor mechanism. However, it is unclear how cells decide whether to senesce or not after DNA damage. By combining experimental data with a parameterized mathematical model we elucidate this cell fate decision at the G1-S transition. Our model provides a quantitative and conceptually new understanding of how human fibroblasts decide whether DNA damage is beyond repair and senesce. Model and data imply that the G1-S transition is regulated by a bistable hysteresis switch with respect to Cdk2 activity, which in turn is controlled by the Cdk2/p21 ratio rather than cyclin abundance. We experimentally confirm the resulting predictions that to induce senescence i) in healthy cells both high initial and elevated background DNA damage are necessary and sufficient, and ii) in already damaged cells much lower additional DNA damage is sufficient. Our study provides a mechanistic explanation of a) how noise in protein abundances allows cells to overcome the G1-S arrest even with substantial DNA damage, potentially leading to neoplasia, and b) how accumulating DNA damage with age increasingly sensitizes cells for senescence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4761720 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47617202016-03-11 To senesce or not to senesce: how primary human fibroblasts decide their cell fate after DNA damage Kollarovic, Gabriel Studencka, Maja Ivanova, Lyubomira Lauenstein, Claudia Heinze, Kristina Lapytsko, Anastasiya Talemi, Soheil Rastgou Figueiredo, Ana Sofia Schaber, Jörg Aging (Albany NY) Research Paper Excessive DNA damage can induce an irreversible cell cycle arrest, called senescence, which is generally perceived as an important tumour-suppressor mechanism. However, it is unclear how cells decide whether to senesce or not after DNA damage. By combining experimental data with a parameterized mathematical model we elucidate this cell fate decision at the G1-S transition. Our model provides a quantitative and conceptually new understanding of how human fibroblasts decide whether DNA damage is beyond repair and senesce. Model and data imply that the G1-S transition is regulated by a bistable hysteresis switch with respect to Cdk2 activity, which in turn is controlled by the Cdk2/p21 ratio rather than cyclin abundance. We experimentally confirm the resulting predictions that to induce senescence i) in healthy cells both high initial and elevated background DNA damage are necessary and sufficient, and ii) in already damaged cells much lower additional DNA damage is sufficient. Our study provides a mechanistic explanation of a) how noise in protein abundances allows cells to overcome the G1-S arrest even with substantial DNA damage, potentially leading to neoplasia, and b) how accumulating DNA damage with age increasingly sensitizes cells for senescence. Impact Journals LLC 2016-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4761720/ /pubmed/26830321 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Kollarovic et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Kollarovic, Gabriel Studencka, Maja Ivanova, Lyubomira Lauenstein, Claudia Heinze, Kristina Lapytsko, Anastasiya Talemi, Soheil Rastgou Figueiredo, Ana Sofia Schaber, Jörg To senesce or not to senesce: how primary human fibroblasts decide their cell fate after DNA damage |
title | To senesce or not to senesce: how primary human fibroblasts decide their cell fate after DNA damage |
title_full | To senesce or not to senesce: how primary human fibroblasts decide their cell fate after DNA damage |
title_fullStr | To senesce or not to senesce: how primary human fibroblasts decide their cell fate after DNA damage |
title_full_unstemmed | To senesce or not to senesce: how primary human fibroblasts decide their cell fate after DNA damage |
title_short | To senesce or not to senesce: how primary human fibroblasts decide their cell fate after DNA damage |
title_sort | to senesce or not to senesce: how primary human fibroblasts decide their cell fate after dna damage |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4761720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26830321 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kollarovicgabriel tosenesceornottosenescehowprimaryhumanfibroblastsdecidetheircellfateafterdnadamage AT studenckamaja tosenesceornottosenescehowprimaryhumanfibroblastsdecidetheircellfateafterdnadamage AT ivanovalyubomira tosenesceornottosenescehowprimaryhumanfibroblastsdecidetheircellfateafterdnadamage AT lauensteinclaudia tosenesceornottosenescehowprimaryhumanfibroblastsdecidetheircellfateafterdnadamage AT heinzekristina tosenesceornottosenescehowprimaryhumanfibroblastsdecidetheircellfateafterdnadamage AT lapytskoanastasiya tosenesceornottosenescehowprimaryhumanfibroblastsdecidetheircellfateafterdnadamage AT talemisoheilrastgou tosenesceornottosenescehowprimaryhumanfibroblastsdecidetheircellfateafterdnadamage AT figueiredoanasofia tosenesceornottosenescehowprimaryhumanfibroblastsdecidetheircellfateafterdnadamage AT schaberjorg tosenesceornottosenescehowprimaryhumanfibroblastsdecidetheircellfateafterdnadamage |