Cargando…
Performance and quality indicators for the management of non-cancer chronic pain: a scoping review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain is a public health problem of epidemic proportion in most countries with important physical, psychological, social and economic consequences. The management of chronic pain is complex and requires an integrated network approach between all levels of the healthcare system a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26895987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010487 |
_version_ | 1782417056653639680 |
---|---|
author | Zidarov, Diana Visca, Regina Gogovor, Amédé Ahmed, Sara |
author_facet | Zidarov, Diana Visca, Regina Gogovor, Amédé Ahmed, Sara |
author_sort | Zidarov, Diana |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain is a public health problem of epidemic proportion in most countries with important physical, psychological, social and economic consequences. The management of chronic pain is complex and requires an integrated network approach between all levels of the healthcare system and the involvement of several health professionals from different disciplines. Measuring the performance of organisations that provide care to individuals with chronic pain is essential to improve quality of care and requires the use of relevant performance and quality indicators. A scoping review methodology will be used to synthesise the evidence on performance and quality indicators developed for non-cancer chronic pain management across the continuum of care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The following electronic databases will be searched from 2000 onwards: Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Review Group Specialised Register; Cochrane Library; EMBASE; PubMed; CINAHL; PsycINFO; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. All types of studies will be included if these are concerned with performance or quality indicators in adults with chronic non-cancer pain. In addition, searches will be conducted on provincial, national and international health organisations as well as health professional and scientific associations’ websites. A qualitative descriptive approach will be used to describe characteristics of each indicator. All identified indicators will be classified according to dimensions covered by Donabedian and the Triple Aim frameworks. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The scoping review findings will inform the development of a performance measurement system comprising a list of performance indicators with their level of evidence which can be used by stakeholders to evaluate the quality of care for individuals with chronic non-cancer pain at the patient, institutional and system level. The results will be disseminated via several knowledge translation strategies, including 2 stakeholder meetings, publication and presentation at conferences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4762093 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47620932016-02-25 Performance and quality indicators for the management of non-cancer chronic pain: a scoping review protocol Zidarov, Diana Visca, Regina Gogovor, Amédé Ahmed, Sara BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain is a public health problem of epidemic proportion in most countries with important physical, psychological, social and economic consequences. The management of chronic pain is complex and requires an integrated network approach between all levels of the healthcare system and the involvement of several health professionals from different disciplines. Measuring the performance of organisations that provide care to individuals with chronic pain is essential to improve quality of care and requires the use of relevant performance and quality indicators. A scoping review methodology will be used to synthesise the evidence on performance and quality indicators developed for non-cancer chronic pain management across the continuum of care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The following electronic databases will be searched from 2000 onwards: Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Review Group Specialised Register; Cochrane Library; EMBASE; PubMed; CINAHL; PsycINFO; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. All types of studies will be included if these are concerned with performance or quality indicators in adults with chronic non-cancer pain. In addition, searches will be conducted on provincial, national and international health organisations as well as health professional and scientific associations’ websites. A qualitative descriptive approach will be used to describe characteristics of each indicator. All identified indicators will be classified according to dimensions covered by Donabedian and the Triple Aim frameworks. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The scoping review findings will inform the development of a performance measurement system comprising a list of performance indicators with their level of evidence which can be used by stakeholders to evaluate the quality of care for individuals with chronic non-cancer pain at the patient, institutional and system level. The results will be disseminated via several knowledge translation strategies, including 2 stakeholder meetings, publication and presentation at conferences. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4762093/ /pubmed/26895987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010487 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Zidarov, Diana Visca, Regina Gogovor, Amédé Ahmed, Sara Performance and quality indicators for the management of non-cancer chronic pain: a scoping review protocol |
title | Performance and quality indicators for the management of non-cancer chronic pain: a scoping review protocol |
title_full | Performance and quality indicators for the management of non-cancer chronic pain: a scoping review protocol |
title_fullStr | Performance and quality indicators for the management of non-cancer chronic pain: a scoping review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance and quality indicators for the management of non-cancer chronic pain: a scoping review protocol |
title_short | Performance and quality indicators for the management of non-cancer chronic pain: a scoping review protocol |
title_sort | performance and quality indicators for the management of non-cancer chronic pain: a scoping review protocol |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26895987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010487 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zidarovdiana performanceandqualityindicatorsforthemanagementofnoncancerchronicpainascopingreviewprotocol AT viscaregina performanceandqualityindicatorsforthemanagementofnoncancerchronicpainascopingreviewprotocol AT gogovoramede performanceandqualityindicatorsforthemanagementofnoncancerchronicpainascopingreviewprotocol AT ahmedsara performanceandqualityindicatorsforthemanagementofnoncancerchronicpainascopingreviewprotocol |