Cargando…

What is a medical decision? A taxonomy based on physician statements in hospital encounters: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVE: The medical literature lacks a comprehensive taxonomy of decisions made by physicians in medical encounters. Such a taxonomy might be useful in understanding the physician-centred, patient-centred and shared decision-making in clinical settings. We aimed to identify and classify all decis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ofstad, Eirik H, Frich, Jan C, Schei, Edvin, Frankel, Richard M, Gulbrandsen, Pål
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26868946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010098
_version_ 1782417060257595392
author Ofstad, Eirik H
Frich, Jan C
Schei, Edvin
Frankel, Richard M
Gulbrandsen, Pål
author_facet Ofstad, Eirik H
Frich, Jan C
Schei, Edvin
Frankel, Richard M
Gulbrandsen, Pål
author_sort Ofstad, Eirik H
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The medical literature lacks a comprehensive taxonomy of decisions made by physicians in medical encounters. Such a taxonomy might be useful in understanding the physician-centred, patient-centred and shared decision-making in clinical settings. We aimed to identify and classify all decisions emerging in conversations between patients and physicians. DESIGN: Qualitative study of video recorded patient–physician encounters. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: 380 patients in consultations with 59 physicians from 17 clinical specialties and three different settings (emergency room, ward round, outpatient clinic) in a Norwegian teaching hospital. A randomised sample of 30 encounters from internal medicine was used to identify and classify decisions, a maximum variation sample of 20 encounters was used for reliability assessments, and the remaining encounters were analysed to test for applicability across specialties. RESULTS: On the basis of physician statements in our material, we developed a taxonomy of clinical decisions—the Decision Identification and Classification Taxonomy for Use in Medicine (DICTUM). We categorised decisions into 10 mutually exclusive categories: gathering additional information, evaluating test results, defining problem, drug-related, therapeutic procedure-related, legal and insurance-related, contact-related, advice and precaution, treatment goal, and deferment. Four-coder inter-rater reliability using Krippendorff's α was 0.79. CONCLUSIONS: DICTUM represents a precise, detailed and comprehensive taxonomy of medical decisions communicated within patient–physician encounters. Compared to previous normative frameworks, the taxonomy is descriptive, substantially broader and offers new categories to the variety of clinical decisions. The taxonomy could prove helpful in studies on the quality of medical work, use of time and resources, and understanding of why, when and how patients are or are not involved in decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4762110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47621102016-02-25 What is a medical decision? A taxonomy based on physician statements in hospital encounters: a qualitative study Ofstad, Eirik H Frich, Jan C Schei, Edvin Frankel, Richard M Gulbrandsen, Pål BMJ Open Communication OBJECTIVE: The medical literature lacks a comprehensive taxonomy of decisions made by physicians in medical encounters. Such a taxonomy might be useful in understanding the physician-centred, patient-centred and shared decision-making in clinical settings. We aimed to identify and classify all decisions emerging in conversations between patients and physicians. DESIGN: Qualitative study of video recorded patient–physician encounters. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: 380 patients in consultations with 59 physicians from 17 clinical specialties and three different settings (emergency room, ward round, outpatient clinic) in a Norwegian teaching hospital. A randomised sample of 30 encounters from internal medicine was used to identify and classify decisions, a maximum variation sample of 20 encounters was used for reliability assessments, and the remaining encounters were analysed to test for applicability across specialties. RESULTS: On the basis of physician statements in our material, we developed a taxonomy of clinical decisions—the Decision Identification and Classification Taxonomy for Use in Medicine (DICTUM). We categorised decisions into 10 mutually exclusive categories: gathering additional information, evaluating test results, defining problem, drug-related, therapeutic procedure-related, legal and insurance-related, contact-related, advice and precaution, treatment goal, and deferment. Four-coder inter-rater reliability using Krippendorff's α was 0.79. CONCLUSIONS: DICTUM represents a precise, detailed and comprehensive taxonomy of medical decisions communicated within patient–physician encounters. Compared to previous normative frameworks, the taxonomy is descriptive, substantially broader and offers new categories to the variety of clinical decisions. The taxonomy could prove helpful in studies on the quality of medical work, use of time and resources, and understanding of why, when and how patients are or are not involved in decisions. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4762110/ /pubmed/26868946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010098 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Communication
Ofstad, Eirik H
Frich, Jan C
Schei, Edvin
Frankel, Richard M
Gulbrandsen, Pål
What is a medical decision? A taxonomy based on physician statements in hospital encounters: a qualitative study
title What is a medical decision? A taxonomy based on physician statements in hospital encounters: a qualitative study
title_full What is a medical decision? A taxonomy based on physician statements in hospital encounters: a qualitative study
title_fullStr What is a medical decision? A taxonomy based on physician statements in hospital encounters: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed What is a medical decision? A taxonomy based on physician statements in hospital encounters: a qualitative study
title_short What is a medical decision? A taxonomy based on physician statements in hospital encounters: a qualitative study
title_sort what is a medical decision? a taxonomy based on physician statements in hospital encounters: a qualitative study
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26868946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010098
work_keys_str_mv AT ofstadeirikh whatisamedicaldecisionataxonomybasedonphysicianstatementsinhospitalencountersaqualitativestudy
AT frichjanc whatisamedicaldecisionataxonomybasedonphysicianstatementsinhospitalencountersaqualitativestudy
AT scheiedvin whatisamedicaldecisionataxonomybasedonphysicianstatementsinhospitalencountersaqualitativestudy
AT frankelrichardm whatisamedicaldecisionataxonomybasedonphysicianstatementsinhospitalencountersaqualitativestudy
AT gulbrandsenpal whatisamedicaldecisionataxonomybasedonphysicianstatementsinhospitalencountersaqualitativestudy