Cargando…

Perspectives on the provision of GDM screening in general practice versus the hospital setting: a qualitative study of providers and patients

OBJECTIVE: A novel gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening programme which involved offering screening at the patient's general practitioner (GP) compared with the traditional hospital setting was trialled. This study investigates perspectives of involved stakeholders on the provision of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tierney, Marie, O'Dea, Angela, Danyliv, Andrii, Carmody, Louise, McGuire, Brian E, Glynn, Liam G, Dunne, Fidelma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26888724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007949
_version_ 1782417068704923648
author Tierney, Marie
O'Dea, Angela
Danyliv, Andrii
Carmody, Louise
McGuire, Brian E
Glynn, Liam G
Dunne, Fidelma
author_facet Tierney, Marie
O'Dea, Angela
Danyliv, Andrii
Carmody, Louise
McGuire, Brian E
Glynn, Liam G
Dunne, Fidelma
author_sort Tierney, Marie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: A novel gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening programme which involved offering screening at the patient's general practitioner (GP) compared with the traditional hospital setting was trialled. This study investigates perspectives of involved stakeholders on the provision of GDM screening at both settings. DESIGN: Thematic analysis of the perspectives of stakeholders involved in the receiving and provision of GDM screening in both the GP and hospital settings drawn from focus groups and interviews. PARTICIPANTS: 3 groups of participants are included in this research—patient participants, GP screening providers and hospital screening providers. All were recruited from a larger sample who participated in a randomised controlled screening trial. Purposeful sampling was utilised to select participants with a wide variety of perspectives on the provision of GDM screening. SETTING: Participants were recruited from a geographical area covered by 3 hospitals in Ireland. RESULTS: 4 themes emerged from thematic analysis—namely (1) travel distance, (2) best care provision, (3) sense of ease created and (4) optimal screening. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of travel distance from the screening site is the most important factor influencing willingness to attend for GDM screening among women who live a considerable distance from the hospital setting. For patients who live equidistance from both settings, other factors are important; namely the waiting facilities including parking, perceived expertise of screening provider personnel, access to emergency treatment if necessary, accuracy of tests and access to timely results and treatment. Optimal screening for GDM should be specialist led, incorporate expert advice of GDM screening, treatment and management, should be provided locally, offer adequate parking and comfort levels, provide accurate tests, and timely access to results and treatment. Such a service should result in improved rates of GDM screening uptake. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN41202110.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4762147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47621472016-02-25 Perspectives on the provision of GDM screening in general practice versus the hospital setting: a qualitative study of providers and patients Tierney, Marie O'Dea, Angela Danyliv, Andrii Carmody, Louise McGuire, Brian E Glynn, Liam G Dunne, Fidelma BMJ Open Diabetes and Endocrinology OBJECTIVE: A novel gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening programme which involved offering screening at the patient's general practitioner (GP) compared with the traditional hospital setting was trialled. This study investigates perspectives of involved stakeholders on the provision of GDM screening at both settings. DESIGN: Thematic analysis of the perspectives of stakeholders involved in the receiving and provision of GDM screening in both the GP and hospital settings drawn from focus groups and interviews. PARTICIPANTS: 3 groups of participants are included in this research—patient participants, GP screening providers and hospital screening providers. All were recruited from a larger sample who participated in a randomised controlled screening trial. Purposeful sampling was utilised to select participants with a wide variety of perspectives on the provision of GDM screening. SETTING: Participants were recruited from a geographical area covered by 3 hospitals in Ireland. RESULTS: 4 themes emerged from thematic analysis—namely (1) travel distance, (2) best care provision, (3) sense of ease created and (4) optimal screening. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of travel distance from the screening site is the most important factor influencing willingness to attend for GDM screening among women who live a considerable distance from the hospital setting. For patients who live equidistance from both settings, other factors are important; namely the waiting facilities including parking, perceived expertise of screening provider personnel, access to emergency treatment if necessary, accuracy of tests and access to timely results and treatment. Optimal screening for GDM should be specialist led, incorporate expert advice of GDM screening, treatment and management, should be provided locally, offer adequate parking and comfort levels, provide accurate tests, and timely access to results and treatment. Such a service should result in improved rates of GDM screening uptake. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN41202110. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4762147/ /pubmed/26888724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007949 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Diabetes and Endocrinology
Tierney, Marie
O'Dea, Angela
Danyliv, Andrii
Carmody, Louise
McGuire, Brian E
Glynn, Liam G
Dunne, Fidelma
Perspectives on the provision of GDM screening in general practice versus the hospital setting: a qualitative study of providers and patients
title Perspectives on the provision of GDM screening in general practice versus the hospital setting: a qualitative study of providers and patients
title_full Perspectives on the provision of GDM screening in general practice versus the hospital setting: a qualitative study of providers and patients
title_fullStr Perspectives on the provision of GDM screening in general practice versus the hospital setting: a qualitative study of providers and patients
title_full_unstemmed Perspectives on the provision of GDM screening in general practice versus the hospital setting: a qualitative study of providers and patients
title_short Perspectives on the provision of GDM screening in general practice versus the hospital setting: a qualitative study of providers and patients
title_sort perspectives on the provision of gdm screening in general practice versus the hospital setting: a qualitative study of providers and patients
topic Diabetes and Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26888724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007949
work_keys_str_mv AT tierneymarie perspectivesontheprovisionofgdmscreeningingeneralpracticeversusthehospitalsettingaqualitativestudyofprovidersandpatients
AT odeaangela perspectivesontheprovisionofgdmscreeningingeneralpracticeversusthehospitalsettingaqualitativestudyofprovidersandpatients
AT danylivandrii perspectivesontheprovisionofgdmscreeningingeneralpracticeversusthehospitalsettingaqualitativestudyofprovidersandpatients
AT carmodylouise perspectivesontheprovisionofgdmscreeningingeneralpracticeversusthehospitalsettingaqualitativestudyofprovidersandpatients
AT mcguirebriane perspectivesontheprovisionofgdmscreeningingeneralpracticeversusthehospitalsettingaqualitativestudyofprovidersandpatients
AT glynnliamg perspectivesontheprovisionofgdmscreeningingeneralpracticeversusthehospitalsettingaqualitativestudyofprovidersandpatients
AT dunnefidelma perspectivesontheprovisionofgdmscreeningingeneralpracticeversusthehospitalsettingaqualitativestudyofprovidersandpatients