Cargando…

The Reliability and Validity of the Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire in Eating Disorder and Community Samples

Background: Clinical perfectionism is a risk and maintaining factor for anxiety disorders, depression and eating disorders. Aims: The aim was to examine the psychometric properties of the 12-item Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire (CPQ). Method: The research involved two samples. Study 1 comprised...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Egan, Sarah J., Shafran, Roz, Lee, Michelle, Fairburn, Christopher G., Cooper, Zafra, Doll, Helen A., Palmer, Robert L., Watson, Hunna J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25731214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352465814000629
_version_ 1782417081268961280
author Egan, Sarah J.
Shafran, Roz
Lee, Michelle
Fairburn, Christopher G.
Cooper, Zafra
Doll, Helen A.
Palmer, Robert L.
Watson, Hunna J.
author_facet Egan, Sarah J.
Shafran, Roz
Lee, Michelle
Fairburn, Christopher G.
Cooper, Zafra
Doll, Helen A.
Palmer, Robert L.
Watson, Hunna J.
author_sort Egan, Sarah J.
collection PubMed
description Background: Clinical perfectionism is a risk and maintaining factor for anxiety disorders, depression and eating disorders. Aims: The aim was to examine the psychometric properties of the 12-item Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire (CPQ). Method: The research involved two samples. Study 1 comprised a nonclinical sample (n = 206) recruited via the internet. Study 2 comprised individuals in treatment for an eating disorder (n = 129) and a community sample (n = 80). Results: Study 1 factor analysis results indicated a two-factor structure. The CPQ had strong correlations with measures of perfectionism and psychopathology, acceptable internal consistency, and discriminative and incremental validity. The results of Study 2 suggested the same two-factor structure, acceptable internal consistency, and construct validity, with the CPQ discriminating between the eating disorder and control groups. Readability was assessed as a US grade 4 reading level (student age range 9–10 years). Conclusions: The findings provide evidence for the reliability and validity of the CPQ in a clinical eating disorder and two separate community samples. Although further research is required the CPQ has promising evidence as a reliable and valid measure of clinical perfectionism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4762235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47622352016-03-07 The Reliability and Validity of the Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire in Eating Disorder and Community Samples Egan, Sarah J. Shafran, Roz Lee, Michelle Fairburn, Christopher G. Cooper, Zafra Doll, Helen A. Palmer, Robert L. Watson, Hunna J. Behav Cogn Psychother Research Article Background: Clinical perfectionism is a risk and maintaining factor for anxiety disorders, depression and eating disorders. Aims: The aim was to examine the psychometric properties of the 12-item Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire (CPQ). Method: The research involved two samples. Study 1 comprised a nonclinical sample (n = 206) recruited via the internet. Study 2 comprised individuals in treatment for an eating disorder (n = 129) and a community sample (n = 80). Results: Study 1 factor analysis results indicated a two-factor structure. The CPQ had strong correlations with measures of perfectionism and psychopathology, acceptable internal consistency, and discriminative and incremental validity. The results of Study 2 suggested the same two-factor structure, acceptable internal consistency, and construct validity, with the CPQ discriminating between the eating disorder and control groups. Readability was assessed as a US grade 4 reading level (student age range 9–10 years). Conclusions: The findings provide evidence for the reliability and validity of the CPQ in a clinical eating disorder and two separate community samples. Although further research is required the CPQ has promising evidence as a reliable and valid measure of clinical perfectionism. Cambridge University Press 2016-01 2015-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4762235/ /pubmed/25731214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352465814000629 Text en © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2015 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Egan, Sarah J.
Shafran, Roz
Lee, Michelle
Fairburn, Christopher G.
Cooper, Zafra
Doll, Helen A.
Palmer, Robert L.
Watson, Hunna J.
The Reliability and Validity of the Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire in Eating Disorder and Community Samples
title The Reliability and Validity of the Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire in Eating Disorder and Community Samples
title_full The Reliability and Validity of the Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire in Eating Disorder and Community Samples
title_fullStr The Reliability and Validity of the Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire in Eating Disorder and Community Samples
title_full_unstemmed The Reliability and Validity of the Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire in Eating Disorder and Community Samples
title_short The Reliability and Validity of the Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire in Eating Disorder and Community Samples
title_sort reliability and validity of the clinical perfectionism questionnaire in eating disorder and community samples
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25731214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352465814000629
work_keys_str_mv AT egansarahj thereliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples
AT shafranroz thereliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples
AT leemichelle thereliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples
AT fairburnchristopherg thereliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples
AT cooperzafra thereliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples
AT dollhelena thereliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples
AT palmerrobertl thereliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples
AT watsonhunnaj thereliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples
AT egansarahj reliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples
AT shafranroz reliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples
AT leemichelle reliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples
AT fairburnchristopherg reliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples
AT cooperzafra reliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples
AT dollhelena reliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples
AT palmerrobertl reliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples
AT watsonhunnaj reliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples