Cargando…
The Reliability and Validity of the Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire in Eating Disorder and Community Samples
Background: Clinical perfectionism is a risk and maintaining factor for anxiety disorders, depression and eating disorders. Aims: The aim was to examine the psychometric properties of the 12-item Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire (CPQ). Method: The research involved two samples. Study 1 comprised...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25731214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352465814000629 |
_version_ | 1782417081268961280 |
---|---|
author | Egan, Sarah J. Shafran, Roz Lee, Michelle Fairburn, Christopher G. Cooper, Zafra Doll, Helen A. Palmer, Robert L. Watson, Hunna J. |
author_facet | Egan, Sarah J. Shafran, Roz Lee, Michelle Fairburn, Christopher G. Cooper, Zafra Doll, Helen A. Palmer, Robert L. Watson, Hunna J. |
author_sort | Egan, Sarah J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Clinical perfectionism is a risk and maintaining factor for anxiety disorders, depression and eating disorders. Aims: The aim was to examine the psychometric properties of the 12-item Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire (CPQ). Method: The research involved two samples. Study 1 comprised a nonclinical sample (n = 206) recruited via the internet. Study 2 comprised individuals in treatment for an eating disorder (n = 129) and a community sample (n = 80). Results: Study 1 factor analysis results indicated a two-factor structure. The CPQ had strong correlations with measures of perfectionism and psychopathology, acceptable internal consistency, and discriminative and incremental validity. The results of Study 2 suggested the same two-factor structure, acceptable internal consistency, and construct validity, with the CPQ discriminating between the eating disorder and control groups. Readability was assessed as a US grade 4 reading level (student age range 9–10 years). Conclusions: The findings provide evidence for the reliability and validity of the CPQ in a clinical eating disorder and two separate community samples. Although further research is required the CPQ has promising evidence as a reliable and valid measure of clinical perfectionism. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4762235 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47622352016-03-07 The Reliability and Validity of the Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire in Eating Disorder and Community Samples Egan, Sarah J. Shafran, Roz Lee, Michelle Fairburn, Christopher G. Cooper, Zafra Doll, Helen A. Palmer, Robert L. Watson, Hunna J. Behav Cogn Psychother Research Article Background: Clinical perfectionism is a risk and maintaining factor for anxiety disorders, depression and eating disorders. Aims: The aim was to examine the psychometric properties of the 12-item Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire (CPQ). Method: The research involved two samples. Study 1 comprised a nonclinical sample (n = 206) recruited via the internet. Study 2 comprised individuals in treatment for an eating disorder (n = 129) and a community sample (n = 80). Results: Study 1 factor analysis results indicated a two-factor structure. The CPQ had strong correlations with measures of perfectionism and psychopathology, acceptable internal consistency, and discriminative and incremental validity. The results of Study 2 suggested the same two-factor structure, acceptable internal consistency, and construct validity, with the CPQ discriminating between the eating disorder and control groups. Readability was assessed as a US grade 4 reading level (student age range 9–10 years). Conclusions: The findings provide evidence for the reliability and validity of the CPQ in a clinical eating disorder and two separate community samples. Although further research is required the CPQ has promising evidence as a reliable and valid measure of clinical perfectionism. Cambridge University Press 2016-01 2015-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4762235/ /pubmed/25731214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352465814000629 Text en © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2015 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Egan, Sarah J. Shafran, Roz Lee, Michelle Fairburn, Christopher G. Cooper, Zafra Doll, Helen A. Palmer, Robert L. Watson, Hunna J. The Reliability and Validity of the Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire in Eating Disorder and Community Samples |
title | The Reliability and Validity of the Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire in Eating Disorder and Community Samples |
title_full | The Reliability and Validity of the Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire in Eating Disorder and Community Samples |
title_fullStr | The Reliability and Validity of the Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire in Eating Disorder and Community Samples |
title_full_unstemmed | The Reliability and Validity of the Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire in Eating Disorder and Community Samples |
title_short | The Reliability and Validity of the Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire in Eating Disorder and Community Samples |
title_sort | reliability and validity of the clinical perfectionism questionnaire in eating disorder and community samples |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25731214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352465814000629 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT egansarahj thereliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples AT shafranroz thereliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples AT leemichelle thereliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples AT fairburnchristopherg thereliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples AT cooperzafra thereliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples AT dollhelena thereliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples AT palmerrobertl thereliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples AT watsonhunnaj thereliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples AT egansarahj reliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples AT shafranroz reliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples AT leemichelle reliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples AT fairburnchristopherg reliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples AT cooperzafra reliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples AT dollhelena reliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples AT palmerrobertl reliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples AT watsonhunnaj reliabilityandvalidityoftheclinicalperfectionismquestionnaireineatingdisorderandcommunitysamples |