Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of reproducibility of peripheral tissues produced by different border molding materials in edentulous patients: An in vivo study

AIM: The aim of the study is to analyze the effect of different materials and techniques in current use on peripheral shaping of complete denture impression. METHODS: The present study was conducted to compare and evaluate the maxillary border morphology produced using tissue conditioner as control...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arora, Aman Kumar, Goyal, Itanshu, Sehgal, Monilka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26929495
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.155030
_version_ 1782417091498868736
author Arora, Aman Kumar
Goyal, Itanshu
Sehgal, Monilka
author_facet Arora, Aman Kumar
Goyal, Itanshu
Sehgal, Monilka
author_sort Arora, Aman Kumar
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of the study is to analyze the effect of different materials and techniques in current use on peripheral shaping of complete denture impression. METHODS: The present study was conducted to compare and evaluate the maxillary border morphology produced using tissue conditioner as control and low fusing impression compound, Polyether, Pattern resin and periphery wax as border molding materials. The study was carried out on 15 denture wearer patients with well formed, rounded edentulous maxillary arch with adequate width and height. On each patient, border moldings were done, with tissue conditioner which was loaded on the borders of previous maxillary denture of the patient (control group), low fusing impression compound (Group 1), polyether (Group 2), Pattern resin (Group 3) and Peripheral wax (Group 4), respectively on special tray made for the patient. Sulcus width height and area was then measured for each group using stereomicroscope. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Based on the study it is concluded that the polyether was the best material for border molding which will give most accurate borders to a denture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4762307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47623072016-04-01 Comparative evaluation of reproducibility of peripheral tissues produced by different border molding materials in edentulous patients: An in vivo study Arora, Aman Kumar Goyal, Itanshu Sehgal, Monilka J Indian Prosthodont Soc Original Article AIM: The aim of the study is to analyze the effect of different materials and techniques in current use on peripheral shaping of complete denture impression. METHODS: The present study was conducted to compare and evaluate the maxillary border morphology produced using tissue conditioner as control and low fusing impression compound, Polyether, Pattern resin and periphery wax as border molding materials. The study was carried out on 15 denture wearer patients with well formed, rounded edentulous maxillary arch with adequate width and height. On each patient, border moldings were done, with tissue conditioner which was loaded on the borders of previous maxillary denture of the patient (control group), low fusing impression compound (Group 1), polyether (Group 2), Pattern resin (Group 3) and Peripheral wax (Group 4), respectively on special tray made for the patient. Sulcus width height and area was then measured for each group using stereomicroscope. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Based on the study it is concluded that the polyether was the best material for border molding which will give most accurate borders to a denture. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4762307/ /pubmed/26929495 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.155030 Text en Copyright: © 2015 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Arora, Aman Kumar
Goyal, Itanshu
Sehgal, Monilka
Comparative evaluation of reproducibility of peripheral tissues produced by different border molding materials in edentulous patients: An in vivo study
title Comparative evaluation of reproducibility of peripheral tissues produced by different border molding materials in edentulous patients: An in vivo study
title_full Comparative evaluation of reproducibility of peripheral tissues produced by different border molding materials in edentulous patients: An in vivo study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of reproducibility of peripheral tissues produced by different border molding materials in edentulous patients: An in vivo study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of reproducibility of peripheral tissues produced by different border molding materials in edentulous patients: An in vivo study
title_short Comparative evaluation of reproducibility of peripheral tissues produced by different border molding materials in edentulous patients: An in vivo study
title_sort comparative evaluation of reproducibility of peripheral tissues produced by different border molding materials in edentulous patients: an in vivo study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26929495
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.155030
work_keys_str_mv AT aroraamankumar comparativeevaluationofreproducibilityofperipheraltissuesproducedbydifferentbordermoldingmaterialsinedentulouspatientsaninvivostudy
AT goyalitanshu comparativeevaluationofreproducibilityofperipheraltissuesproducedbydifferentbordermoldingmaterialsinedentulouspatientsaninvivostudy
AT sehgalmonilka comparativeevaluationofreproducibilityofperipheraltissuesproducedbydifferentbordermoldingmaterialsinedentulouspatientsaninvivostudy