Cargando…

Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to asses & compare the load transfer characteristics of Ball/O-ring and Bar/Clip attachment systems in implant supported overdentures using analog and finite element analysis models. METHODOLOGY: For the analog part of the study, castable bar was us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Satpathy, Soumyadev, Babu, C. L. Satish, Shetty, Shilpa, Raj, Bharat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26929521
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.165324
_version_ 1782417097571172352
author Satpathy, Soumyadev
Babu, C. L. Satish
Shetty, Shilpa
Raj, Bharat
author_facet Satpathy, Soumyadev
Babu, C. L. Satish
Shetty, Shilpa
Raj, Bharat
author_sort Satpathy, Soumyadev
collection PubMed
description AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to asses & compare the load transfer characteristics of Ball/O-ring and Bar/Clip attachment systems in implant supported overdentures using analog and finite element analysis models. METHODOLOGY: For the analog part of the study, castable bar was used for the bar and clip attachment and a metallic housing with a rubber O-ring component was used for the ball/O-ring attachment. The stress on the implant surface was measured using the strain-gauge technique. For the finite element analysis, the model were fabricated and load applications were done in a similar manner as in analog study. RESULTS: The difference between both the attachment systems was found to be statistically significant (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Ball/O-ring attachment system transmitted lesser amount of stresses to the implants on the non-loading side, as compared to the Bar-Clip attachment system. When overall stress distribution is compared, the Bar-Clip attachment seems to perform better than the Ball/O-ring attachment, because the force was distributed better.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4762336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47623362016-07-01 Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study Satpathy, Soumyadev Babu, C. L. Satish Shetty, Shilpa Raj, Bharat J Indian Prosthodont Soc Original Article AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to asses & compare the load transfer characteristics of Ball/O-ring and Bar/Clip attachment systems in implant supported overdentures using analog and finite element analysis models. METHODOLOGY: For the analog part of the study, castable bar was used for the bar and clip attachment and a metallic housing with a rubber O-ring component was used for the ball/O-ring attachment. The stress on the implant surface was measured using the strain-gauge technique. For the finite element analysis, the model were fabricated and load applications were done in a similar manner as in analog study. RESULTS: The difference between both the attachment systems was found to be statistically significant (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Ball/O-ring attachment system transmitted lesser amount of stresses to the implants on the non-loading side, as compared to the Bar-Clip attachment system. When overall stress distribution is compared, the Bar-Clip attachment seems to perform better than the Ball/O-ring attachment, because the force was distributed better. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4762336/ /pubmed/26929521 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.165324 Text en Copyright: © 2015 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Satpathy, Soumyadev
Babu, C. L. Satish
Shetty, Shilpa
Raj, Bharat
Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study
title Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study
title_full Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study
title_fullStr Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study
title_short Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study
title_sort stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: a comparative in-vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26929521
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.165324
work_keys_str_mv AT satpathysoumyadev stressdistributionpatternsofimplantsupportedoverdenturesanalogversusfiniteelementanalysisacomparativeinvitrostudy
AT babuclsatish stressdistributionpatternsofimplantsupportedoverdenturesanalogversusfiniteelementanalysisacomparativeinvitrostudy
AT shettyshilpa stressdistributionpatternsofimplantsupportedoverdenturesanalogversusfiniteelementanalysisacomparativeinvitrostudy
AT rajbharat stressdistributionpatternsofimplantsupportedoverdenturesanalogversusfiniteelementanalysisacomparativeinvitrostudy