Cargando…
Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to asses & compare the load transfer characteristics of Ball/O-ring and Bar/Clip attachment systems in implant supported overdentures using analog and finite element analysis models. METHODOLOGY: For the analog part of the study, castable bar was us...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26929521 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.165324 |
_version_ | 1782417097571172352 |
---|---|
author | Satpathy, Soumyadev Babu, C. L. Satish Shetty, Shilpa Raj, Bharat |
author_facet | Satpathy, Soumyadev Babu, C. L. Satish Shetty, Shilpa Raj, Bharat |
author_sort | Satpathy, Soumyadev |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to asses & compare the load transfer characteristics of Ball/O-ring and Bar/Clip attachment systems in implant supported overdentures using analog and finite element analysis models. METHODOLOGY: For the analog part of the study, castable bar was used for the bar and clip attachment and a metallic housing with a rubber O-ring component was used for the ball/O-ring attachment. The stress on the implant surface was measured using the strain-gauge technique. For the finite element analysis, the model were fabricated and load applications were done in a similar manner as in analog study. RESULTS: The difference between both the attachment systems was found to be statistically significant (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Ball/O-ring attachment system transmitted lesser amount of stresses to the implants on the non-loading side, as compared to the Bar-Clip attachment system. When overall stress distribution is compared, the Bar-Clip attachment seems to perform better than the Ball/O-ring attachment, because the force was distributed better. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4762336 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47623362016-07-01 Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study Satpathy, Soumyadev Babu, C. L. Satish Shetty, Shilpa Raj, Bharat J Indian Prosthodont Soc Original Article AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to asses & compare the load transfer characteristics of Ball/O-ring and Bar/Clip attachment systems in implant supported overdentures using analog and finite element analysis models. METHODOLOGY: For the analog part of the study, castable bar was used for the bar and clip attachment and a metallic housing with a rubber O-ring component was used for the ball/O-ring attachment. The stress on the implant surface was measured using the strain-gauge technique. For the finite element analysis, the model were fabricated and load applications were done in a similar manner as in analog study. RESULTS: The difference between both the attachment systems was found to be statistically significant (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Ball/O-ring attachment system transmitted lesser amount of stresses to the implants on the non-loading side, as compared to the Bar-Clip attachment system. When overall stress distribution is compared, the Bar-Clip attachment seems to perform better than the Ball/O-ring attachment, because the force was distributed better. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4762336/ /pubmed/26929521 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.165324 Text en Copyright: © 2015 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Satpathy, Soumyadev Babu, C. L. Satish Shetty, Shilpa Raj, Bharat Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study |
title | Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study |
title_full | Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study |
title_fullStr | Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study |
title_short | Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study |
title_sort | stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: a comparative in-vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26929521 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.165324 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT satpathysoumyadev stressdistributionpatternsofimplantsupportedoverdenturesanalogversusfiniteelementanalysisacomparativeinvitrostudy AT babuclsatish stressdistributionpatternsofimplantsupportedoverdenturesanalogversusfiniteelementanalysisacomparativeinvitrostudy AT shettyshilpa stressdistributionpatternsofimplantsupportedoverdenturesanalogversusfiniteelementanalysisacomparativeinvitrostudy AT rajbharat stressdistributionpatternsofimplantsupportedoverdenturesanalogversusfiniteelementanalysisacomparativeinvitrostudy |