Cargando…

Effect of Collateral Sprouting on Donor Nerve Function After Nerve Coaptation: A Study of the Brachial Plexus

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the donor nerve from the C7 spinal nerve of the rabbit brachial plexus after a coaptation procedure. Assessment was performed of avulsion of the C5 and C6 spinal nerves treated by coaptation of these nerves to the C7 spinal nerve. MATERIAL/MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reichert, Paweł, Kiełbowicz, Zdzisław, Dzięgiel, Piotr, Puła, Bartosz, Wrzosek, Marcin, Bocheńska, Aneta, Gosk, Jerzy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26848925
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.895397
_version_ 1782417108669300736
author Reichert, Paweł
Kiełbowicz, Zdzisław
Dzięgiel, Piotr
Puła, Bartosz
Wrzosek, Marcin
Bocheńska, Aneta
Gosk, Jerzy
author_facet Reichert, Paweł
Kiełbowicz, Zdzisław
Dzięgiel, Piotr
Puła, Bartosz
Wrzosek, Marcin
Bocheńska, Aneta
Gosk, Jerzy
author_sort Reichert, Paweł
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the donor nerve from the C7 spinal nerve of the rabbit brachial plexus after a coaptation procedure. Assessment was performed of avulsion of the C5 and C6 spinal nerves treated by coaptation of these nerves to the C7 spinal nerve. MATERIAL/METHODS: After nerve injury, fourteen rabbits were treated by end-to-side coaptation (ETS), and fourteen animals were treated by side-to-side coaptation (STS) on the right brachial plexus. Electrophysiological and histomorphometric analyses and the skin pinch test were used to evaluate the outcomes. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the G-ratio proximal and distal to the coaptation in the ETS group, but the differences in the axon, myelin sheath and fiber diameters were statistically significant. The comparison of the ETS and STS groups distal to the coaptation with the controls demonstrated statistically significant differences in the fiber, axon, and myelin sheath diameters. With respect to the G-ratio, the ETS group exhibited no significant differences relative to the control, whereas the G-ratio in the STS group and the controls differed significantly. In the electrophysiological study, the ETS and STS groups exhibited major changes in the biceps and subscapularis muscles. CONCLUSIONS: The coaptation procedure affects the histological structure of the nerve donor, but it does not translate into changes in nerve conduction or the sensory function of the limb. The donor nerve lesion in the ETS group is transient and has minimal clinical relevance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4762401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47624012016-03-08 Effect of Collateral Sprouting on Donor Nerve Function After Nerve Coaptation: A Study of the Brachial Plexus Reichert, Paweł Kiełbowicz, Zdzisław Dzięgiel, Piotr Puła, Bartosz Wrzosek, Marcin Bocheńska, Aneta Gosk, Jerzy Med Sci Monit Animal Study BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the donor nerve from the C7 spinal nerve of the rabbit brachial plexus after a coaptation procedure. Assessment was performed of avulsion of the C5 and C6 spinal nerves treated by coaptation of these nerves to the C7 spinal nerve. MATERIAL/METHODS: After nerve injury, fourteen rabbits were treated by end-to-side coaptation (ETS), and fourteen animals were treated by side-to-side coaptation (STS) on the right brachial plexus. Electrophysiological and histomorphometric analyses and the skin pinch test were used to evaluate the outcomes. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the G-ratio proximal and distal to the coaptation in the ETS group, but the differences in the axon, myelin sheath and fiber diameters were statistically significant. The comparison of the ETS and STS groups distal to the coaptation with the controls demonstrated statistically significant differences in the fiber, axon, and myelin sheath diameters. With respect to the G-ratio, the ETS group exhibited no significant differences relative to the control, whereas the G-ratio in the STS group and the controls differed significantly. In the electrophysiological study, the ETS and STS groups exhibited major changes in the biceps and subscapularis muscles. CONCLUSIONS: The coaptation procedure affects the histological structure of the nerve donor, but it does not translate into changes in nerve conduction or the sensory function of the limb. The donor nerve lesion in the ETS group is transient and has minimal clinical relevance. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2016-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4762401/ /pubmed/26848925 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.895397 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2016 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License
spellingShingle Animal Study
Reichert, Paweł
Kiełbowicz, Zdzisław
Dzięgiel, Piotr
Puła, Bartosz
Wrzosek, Marcin
Bocheńska, Aneta
Gosk, Jerzy
Effect of Collateral Sprouting on Donor Nerve Function After Nerve Coaptation: A Study of the Brachial Plexus
title Effect of Collateral Sprouting on Donor Nerve Function After Nerve Coaptation: A Study of the Brachial Plexus
title_full Effect of Collateral Sprouting on Donor Nerve Function After Nerve Coaptation: A Study of the Brachial Plexus
title_fullStr Effect of Collateral Sprouting on Donor Nerve Function After Nerve Coaptation: A Study of the Brachial Plexus
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Collateral Sprouting on Donor Nerve Function After Nerve Coaptation: A Study of the Brachial Plexus
title_short Effect of Collateral Sprouting on Donor Nerve Function After Nerve Coaptation: A Study of the Brachial Plexus
title_sort effect of collateral sprouting on donor nerve function after nerve coaptation: a study of the brachial plexus
topic Animal Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26848925
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.895397
work_keys_str_mv AT reichertpaweł effectofcollateralsproutingondonornervefunctionafternervecoaptationastudyofthebrachialplexus
AT kiełbowiczzdzisław effectofcollateralsproutingondonornervefunctionafternervecoaptationastudyofthebrachialplexus
AT dziegielpiotr effectofcollateralsproutingondonornervefunctionafternervecoaptationastudyofthebrachialplexus
AT pułabartosz effectofcollateralsproutingondonornervefunctionafternervecoaptationastudyofthebrachialplexus
AT wrzosekmarcin effectofcollateralsproutingondonornervefunctionafternervecoaptationastudyofthebrachialplexus
AT bochenskaaneta effectofcollateralsproutingondonornervefunctionafternervecoaptationastudyofthebrachialplexus
AT goskjerzy effectofcollateralsproutingondonornervefunctionafternervecoaptationastudyofthebrachialplexus