Cargando…

Multisensory Stimulation to Improve Low- and Higher-Level Sensory Deficits after Stroke: A Systematic Review

The aim of this systematic review was to integrate and assess evidence for the effectiveness of multisensory stimulation (i.e., stimulating at least two of the following sensory systems: visual, auditory, and somatosensory) as a possible rehabilitation method after stroke. Evidence was considered wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tinga, Angelica Maria, Visser-Meily, Johanna Maria Augusta, van der Smagt, Maarten Jeroen, Van der Stigchel, Stefan, van Ee, Raymond, Nijboer, Tanja Cornelia Wilhelmina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26490254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11065-015-9301-1
_version_ 1782417166002290688
author Tinga, Angelica Maria
Visser-Meily, Johanna Maria Augusta
van der Smagt, Maarten Jeroen
Van der Stigchel, Stefan
van Ee, Raymond
Nijboer, Tanja Cornelia Wilhelmina
author_facet Tinga, Angelica Maria
Visser-Meily, Johanna Maria Augusta
van der Smagt, Maarten Jeroen
Van der Stigchel, Stefan
van Ee, Raymond
Nijboer, Tanja Cornelia Wilhelmina
author_sort Tinga, Angelica Maria
collection PubMed
description The aim of this systematic review was to integrate and assess evidence for the effectiveness of multisensory stimulation (i.e., stimulating at least two of the following sensory systems: visual, auditory, and somatosensory) as a possible rehabilitation method after stroke. Evidence was considered with a focus on low-level, perceptual (visual, auditory and somatosensory deficits), as well as higher-level, cognitive, sensory deficits. We referred to the electronic databases Scopus and PubMed to search for articles that were published before May 2015. Studies were included which evaluated the effects of multisensory stimulation on patients with low- or higher-level sensory deficits caused by stroke. Twenty-one studies were included in this review and the quality of these studies was assessed (based on eight elements: randomization, inclusion of control patient group, blinding of participants, blinding of researchers, follow-up, group size, reporting effect sizes, and reporting time post-stroke). Twenty of the twenty-one included studies demonstrate beneficial effects on low- and/or higher-level sensory deficits after stroke. Notwithstanding these beneficial effects, the quality of the studies is insufficient for valid conclusion that multisensory stimulation can be successfully applied as an effective intervention. A valuable and necessary next step would be to set up well-designed randomized controlled trials to examine the effectiveness of multisensory stimulation as an intervention for low- and/or higher-level sensory deficits after stroke. Finally, we consider the potential mechanisms of multisensory stimulation for rehabilitation to guide this future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4762927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47629272016-03-03 Multisensory Stimulation to Improve Low- and Higher-Level Sensory Deficits after Stroke: A Systematic Review Tinga, Angelica Maria Visser-Meily, Johanna Maria Augusta van der Smagt, Maarten Jeroen Van der Stigchel, Stefan van Ee, Raymond Nijboer, Tanja Cornelia Wilhelmina Neuropsychol Rev Review The aim of this systematic review was to integrate and assess evidence for the effectiveness of multisensory stimulation (i.e., stimulating at least two of the following sensory systems: visual, auditory, and somatosensory) as a possible rehabilitation method after stroke. Evidence was considered with a focus on low-level, perceptual (visual, auditory and somatosensory deficits), as well as higher-level, cognitive, sensory deficits. We referred to the electronic databases Scopus and PubMed to search for articles that were published before May 2015. Studies were included which evaluated the effects of multisensory stimulation on patients with low- or higher-level sensory deficits caused by stroke. Twenty-one studies were included in this review and the quality of these studies was assessed (based on eight elements: randomization, inclusion of control patient group, blinding of participants, blinding of researchers, follow-up, group size, reporting effect sizes, and reporting time post-stroke). Twenty of the twenty-one included studies demonstrate beneficial effects on low- and/or higher-level sensory deficits after stroke. Notwithstanding these beneficial effects, the quality of the studies is insufficient for valid conclusion that multisensory stimulation can be successfully applied as an effective intervention. A valuable and necessary next step would be to set up well-designed randomized controlled trials to examine the effectiveness of multisensory stimulation as an intervention for low- and/or higher-level sensory deficits after stroke. Finally, we consider the potential mechanisms of multisensory stimulation for rehabilitation to guide this future research. Springer US 2015-10-21 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4762927/ /pubmed/26490254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11065-015-9301-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Tinga, Angelica Maria
Visser-Meily, Johanna Maria Augusta
van der Smagt, Maarten Jeroen
Van der Stigchel, Stefan
van Ee, Raymond
Nijboer, Tanja Cornelia Wilhelmina
Multisensory Stimulation to Improve Low- and Higher-Level Sensory Deficits after Stroke: A Systematic Review
title Multisensory Stimulation to Improve Low- and Higher-Level Sensory Deficits after Stroke: A Systematic Review
title_full Multisensory Stimulation to Improve Low- and Higher-Level Sensory Deficits after Stroke: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Multisensory Stimulation to Improve Low- and Higher-Level Sensory Deficits after Stroke: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Multisensory Stimulation to Improve Low- and Higher-Level Sensory Deficits after Stroke: A Systematic Review
title_short Multisensory Stimulation to Improve Low- and Higher-Level Sensory Deficits after Stroke: A Systematic Review
title_sort multisensory stimulation to improve low- and higher-level sensory deficits after stroke: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26490254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11065-015-9301-1
work_keys_str_mv AT tingaangelicamaria multisensorystimulationtoimprovelowandhigherlevelsensorydeficitsafterstrokeasystematicreview
AT vissermeilyjohannamariaaugusta multisensorystimulationtoimprovelowandhigherlevelsensorydeficitsafterstrokeasystematicreview
AT vandersmagtmaartenjeroen multisensorystimulationtoimprovelowandhigherlevelsensorydeficitsafterstrokeasystematicreview
AT vanderstigchelstefan multisensorystimulationtoimprovelowandhigherlevelsensorydeficitsafterstrokeasystematicreview
AT vaneeraymond multisensorystimulationtoimprovelowandhigherlevelsensorydeficitsafterstrokeasystematicreview
AT nijboertanjacorneliawilhelmina multisensorystimulationtoimprovelowandhigherlevelsensorydeficitsafterstrokeasystematicreview