Cargando…
Multisensory Stimulation to Improve Low- and Higher-Level Sensory Deficits after Stroke: A Systematic Review
The aim of this systematic review was to integrate and assess evidence for the effectiveness of multisensory stimulation (i.e., stimulating at least two of the following sensory systems: visual, auditory, and somatosensory) as a possible rehabilitation method after stroke. Evidence was considered wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26490254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11065-015-9301-1 |
_version_ | 1782417166002290688 |
---|---|
author | Tinga, Angelica Maria Visser-Meily, Johanna Maria Augusta van der Smagt, Maarten Jeroen Van der Stigchel, Stefan van Ee, Raymond Nijboer, Tanja Cornelia Wilhelmina |
author_facet | Tinga, Angelica Maria Visser-Meily, Johanna Maria Augusta van der Smagt, Maarten Jeroen Van der Stigchel, Stefan van Ee, Raymond Nijboer, Tanja Cornelia Wilhelmina |
author_sort | Tinga, Angelica Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this systematic review was to integrate and assess evidence for the effectiveness of multisensory stimulation (i.e., stimulating at least two of the following sensory systems: visual, auditory, and somatosensory) as a possible rehabilitation method after stroke. Evidence was considered with a focus on low-level, perceptual (visual, auditory and somatosensory deficits), as well as higher-level, cognitive, sensory deficits. We referred to the electronic databases Scopus and PubMed to search for articles that were published before May 2015. Studies were included which evaluated the effects of multisensory stimulation on patients with low- or higher-level sensory deficits caused by stroke. Twenty-one studies were included in this review and the quality of these studies was assessed (based on eight elements: randomization, inclusion of control patient group, blinding of participants, blinding of researchers, follow-up, group size, reporting effect sizes, and reporting time post-stroke). Twenty of the twenty-one included studies demonstrate beneficial effects on low- and/or higher-level sensory deficits after stroke. Notwithstanding these beneficial effects, the quality of the studies is insufficient for valid conclusion that multisensory stimulation can be successfully applied as an effective intervention. A valuable and necessary next step would be to set up well-designed randomized controlled trials to examine the effectiveness of multisensory stimulation as an intervention for low- and/or higher-level sensory deficits after stroke. Finally, we consider the potential mechanisms of multisensory stimulation for rehabilitation to guide this future research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4762927 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47629272016-03-03 Multisensory Stimulation to Improve Low- and Higher-Level Sensory Deficits after Stroke: A Systematic Review Tinga, Angelica Maria Visser-Meily, Johanna Maria Augusta van der Smagt, Maarten Jeroen Van der Stigchel, Stefan van Ee, Raymond Nijboer, Tanja Cornelia Wilhelmina Neuropsychol Rev Review The aim of this systematic review was to integrate and assess evidence for the effectiveness of multisensory stimulation (i.e., stimulating at least two of the following sensory systems: visual, auditory, and somatosensory) as a possible rehabilitation method after stroke. Evidence was considered with a focus on low-level, perceptual (visual, auditory and somatosensory deficits), as well as higher-level, cognitive, sensory deficits. We referred to the electronic databases Scopus and PubMed to search for articles that were published before May 2015. Studies were included which evaluated the effects of multisensory stimulation on patients with low- or higher-level sensory deficits caused by stroke. Twenty-one studies were included in this review and the quality of these studies was assessed (based on eight elements: randomization, inclusion of control patient group, blinding of participants, blinding of researchers, follow-up, group size, reporting effect sizes, and reporting time post-stroke). Twenty of the twenty-one included studies demonstrate beneficial effects on low- and/or higher-level sensory deficits after stroke. Notwithstanding these beneficial effects, the quality of the studies is insufficient for valid conclusion that multisensory stimulation can be successfully applied as an effective intervention. A valuable and necessary next step would be to set up well-designed randomized controlled trials to examine the effectiveness of multisensory stimulation as an intervention for low- and/or higher-level sensory deficits after stroke. Finally, we consider the potential mechanisms of multisensory stimulation for rehabilitation to guide this future research. Springer US 2015-10-21 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4762927/ /pubmed/26490254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11065-015-9301-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Tinga, Angelica Maria Visser-Meily, Johanna Maria Augusta van der Smagt, Maarten Jeroen Van der Stigchel, Stefan van Ee, Raymond Nijboer, Tanja Cornelia Wilhelmina Multisensory Stimulation to Improve Low- and Higher-Level Sensory Deficits after Stroke: A Systematic Review |
title | Multisensory Stimulation to Improve Low- and Higher-Level Sensory Deficits after Stroke: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Multisensory Stimulation to Improve Low- and Higher-Level Sensory Deficits after Stroke: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Multisensory Stimulation to Improve Low- and Higher-Level Sensory Deficits after Stroke: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Multisensory Stimulation to Improve Low- and Higher-Level Sensory Deficits after Stroke: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Multisensory Stimulation to Improve Low- and Higher-Level Sensory Deficits after Stroke: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | multisensory stimulation to improve low- and higher-level sensory deficits after stroke: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26490254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11065-015-9301-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tingaangelicamaria multisensorystimulationtoimprovelowandhigherlevelsensorydeficitsafterstrokeasystematicreview AT vissermeilyjohannamariaaugusta multisensorystimulationtoimprovelowandhigherlevelsensorydeficitsafterstrokeasystematicreview AT vandersmagtmaartenjeroen multisensorystimulationtoimprovelowandhigherlevelsensorydeficitsafterstrokeasystematicreview AT vanderstigchelstefan multisensorystimulationtoimprovelowandhigherlevelsensorydeficitsafterstrokeasystematicreview AT vaneeraymond multisensorystimulationtoimprovelowandhigherlevelsensorydeficitsafterstrokeasystematicreview AT nijboertanjacorneliawilhelmina multisensorystimulationtoimprovelowandhigherlevelsensorydeficitsafterstrokeasystematicreview |