Cargando…

Perceived Comfort and Blinding Efficacy in Randomised Sham-Controlled Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Trials at 2 mA in Young and Older Healthy Adults

BACKGROUND: tDCS studies typically find that: lowest levels of comfort occur at stimulation-onset; young adult participants experience less comfort than older participants; and participants’ blinding seems effective at low current strengths. At 2 mA conflicting results have been reported, questionin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wallace, Denise, Cooper, Nicholas R., Paulmann, Silke, Fitzgerald, Paul B., Russo, Riccardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4763202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26900961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149703
_version_ 1782417222784778240
author Wallace, Denise
Cooper, Nicholas R.
Paulmann, Silke
Fitzgerald, Paul B.
Russo, Riccardo
author_facet Wallace, Denise
Cooper, Nicholas R.
Paulmann, Silke
Fitzgerald, Paul B.
Russo, Riccardo
author_sort Wallace, Denise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: tDCS studies typically find that: lowest levels of comfort occur at stimulation-onset; young adult participants experience less comfort than older participants; and participants’ blinding seems effective at low current strengths. At 2 mA conflicting results have been reported, questioning the effectiveness of blinding in sham-controlled paradigms using higher current strengths. Investigator blinding is rarely reported. OBJECTIVE: Using a protocol with 30 min of 2 mA stimulation we sought to: (a) investigate the level of perceived comfort in young and older adults, ranging in age from 19 to 29 years and 63 to 76 years, respectively; (b) test investigator and participant blinding; (c) assess comfort over a longer stimulation duration; (d) add to the literature on protocols using 2 mA current strength. METHODS: A two-session experiment was conducted where sham and active stimulation were administered to the frontal cortex at the F8/FP1 sites in a within-subjects manner. Levels of perceived comfort were measured, using a visual analogue scale, at the start and end of stimulation in young and older adults. Post-stimulation, participants and investigators judged whether or not active stimulation was used. RESULTS: Comfort scores were lower at stimulation onset in both age groups. Older adults reported: (i) more comfort than young participants overall; (ii) comparable levels of comfort in sham and active stimulation; (iii) significantly more comfort than the young participants during active stimulation. Stimulation mode was correctly identified above chance in the second of the two sessions; 65% of all participants correctly identified the stimulation mode, resulting in a statistical trend. Similarly, the experimenter correctly identified stimulation mode significantly above chance, with 62% of all investigator judgements correct across 120 judgements. CONCLUSIONS: Using 2 mA current strength over 30 minutes, tDCS stimulation comfort is lower at stimulation onset in young and older adults and, overall, lower for young participants. Investigators and participants may be able to identify active stimulation at above chance levels, although accuracy never exceeded 65% for either participants or the experimenter. Further research into blinding efficacy is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4763202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47632022016-03-07 Perceived Comfort and Blinding Efficacy in Randomised Sham-Controlled Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Trials at 2 mA in Young and Older Healthy Adults Wallace, Denise Cooper, Nicholas R. Paulmann, Silke Fitzgerald, Paul B. Russo, Riccardo PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: tDCS studies typically find that: lowest levels of comfort occur at stimulation-onset; young adult participants experience less comfort than older participants; and participants’ blinding seems effective at low current strengths. At 2 mA conflicting results have been reported, questioning the effectiveness of blinding in sham-controlled paradigms using higher current strengths. Investigator blinding is rarely reported. OBJECTIVE: Using a protocol with 30 min of 2 mA stimulation we sought to: (a) investigate the level of perceived comfort in young and older adults, ranging in age from 19 to 29 years and 63 to 76 years, respectively; (b) test investigator and participant blinding; (c) assess comfort over a longer stimulation duration; (d) add to the literature on protocols using 2 mA current strength. METHODS: A two-session experiment was conducted where sham and active stimulation were administered to the frontal cortex at the F8/FP1 sites in a within-subjects manner. Levels of perceived comfort were measured, using a visual analogue scale, at the start and end of stimulation in young and older adults. Post-stimulation, participants and investigators judged whether or not active stimulation was used. RESULTS: Comfort scores were lower at stimulation onset in both age groups. Older adults reported: (i) more comfort than young participants overall; (ii) comparable levels of comfort in sham and active stimulation; (iii) significantly more comfort than the young participants during active stimulation. Stimulation mode was correctly identified above chance in the second of the two sessions; 65% of all participants correctly identified the stimulation mode, resulting in a statistical trend. Similarly, the experimenter correctly identified stimulation mode significantly above chance, with 62% of all investigator judgements correct across 120 judgements. CONCLUSIONS: Using 2 mA current strength over 30 minutes, tDCS stimulation comfort is lower at stimulation onset in young and older adults and, overall, lower for young participants. Investigators and participants may be able to identify active stimulation at above chance levels, although accuracy never exceeded 65% for either participants or the experimenter. Further research into blinding efficacy is recommended. Public Library of Science 2016-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4763202/ /pubmed/26900961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149703 Text en © 2016 Wallace et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wallace, Denise
Cooper, Nicholas R.
Paulmann, Silke
Fitzgerald, Paul B.
Russo, Riccardo
Perceived Comfort and Blinding Efficacy in Randomised Sham-Controlled Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Trials at 2 mA in Young and Older Healthy Adults
title Perceived Comfort and Blinding Efficacy in Randomised Sham-Controlled Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Trials at 2 mA in Young and Older Healthy Adults
title_full Perceived Comfort and Blinding Efficacy in Randomised Sham-Controlled Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Trials at 2 mA in Young and Older Healthy Adults
title_fullStr Perceived Comfort and Blinding Efficacy in Randomised Sham-Controlled Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Trials at 2 mA in Young and Older Healthy Adults
title_full_unstemmed Perceived Comfort and Blinding Efficacy in Randomised Sham-Controlled Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Trials at 2 mA in Young and Older Healthy Adults
title_short Perceived Comfort and Blinding Efficacy in Randomised Sham-Controlled Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Trials at 2 mA in Young and Older Healthy Adults
title_sort perceived comfort and blinding efficacy in randomised sham-controlled transcranial direct current stimulation (tdcs) trials at 2 ma in young and older healthy adults
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4763202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26900961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149703
work_keys_str_mv AT wallacedenise perceivedcomfortandblindingefficacyinrandomisedshamcontrolledtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtdcstrialsat2mainyoungandolderhealthyadults
AT coopernicholasr perceivedcomfortandblindingefficacyinrandomisedshamcontrolledtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtdcstrialsat2mainyoungandolderhealthyadults
AT paulmannsilke perceivedcomfortandblindingefficacyinrandomisedshamcontrolledtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtdcstrialsat2mainyoungandolderhealthyadults
AT fitzgeraldpaulb perceivedcomfortandblindingefficacyinrandomisedshamcontrolledtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtdcstrialsat2mainyoungandolderhealthyadults
AT russoriccardo perceivedcomfortandblindingefficacyinrandomisedshamcontrolledtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtdcstrialsat2mainyoungandolderhealthyadults