Cargando…
Comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: A French multicenter observational study
OBJECTIVE: To compare natalizumab and fingolimod on both clinical and MRI outcomes in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) from 27 multiple sclerosis centers participating in the French follow-up cohort Observatoire of Multiple Sclerosis. METHODS: Patients with RRMS included i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4763805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26826205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002395 |
_version_ | 1782417318820708352 |
---|---|
author | Barbin, Laetitia Rousseau, Chloe Jousset, Natacha Casey, Romain Debouverie, Marc Vukusic, Sandra De Sèze, Jerome Brassat, David Wiertlewski, Sandrine Brochet, Bruno Pelletier, Jean Vermersch, Patrick Edan, Gilles Lebrun-Frenay, Christine Clavelou, Pierre Thouvenot, Eric Camdessanché, Jean-Philippe Tourbah, Ayman Stankoff, Bruno Al Khedr, Abdullatif Cabre, Philippe Papeix, Caroline Berger, Eric Heinzlef, Olivier Debroucker, Thomas Moreau, Thibault Gout, Olivier Bourre, Bertrand Créange, Alain Labauge, Pierre Magy, Laurent Defer, Gilles Foucher, Yohann Laplaud, David A. |
author_facet | Barbin, Laetitia Rousseau, Chloe Jousset, Natacha Casey, Romain Debouverie, Marc Vukusic, Sandra De Sèze, Jerome Brassat, David Wiertlewski, Sandrine Brochet, Bruno Pelletier, Jean Vermersch, Patrick Edan, Gilles Lebrun-Frenay, Christine Clavelou, Pierre Thouvenot, Eric Camdessanché, Jean-Philippe Tourbah, Ayman Stankoff, Bruno Al Khedr, Abdullatif Cabre, Philippe Papeix, Caroline Berger, Eric Heinzlef, Olivier Debroucker, Thomas Moreau, Thibault Gout, Olivier Bourre, Bertrand Créange, Alain Labauge, Pierre Magy, Laurent Defer, Gilles Foucher, Yohann Laplaud, David A. |
author_sort | Barbin, Laetitia |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare natalizumab and fingolimod on both clinical and MRI outcomes in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) from 27 multiple sclerosis centers participating in the French follow-up cohort Observatoire of Multiple Sclerosis. METHODS: Patients with RRMS included in the study were aged from 18 to 65 years with an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 0–5.5 and an available brain MRI performed within the year before treatment initiation. The data were collected for 326 patients treated with natalizumab and 303 with fingolimod. The statistical analysis was performed using 2 different methods: logistic regression and propensity scores (inverse probability treatment weighting). RESULTS: The confounder-adjusted proportion of patients with at least one relapse within the first and second year of treatment was lower in natalizumab-treated patients compared to the fingolimod group (21.1% vs 30.4% at first year, p = 0.0092; and 30.9% vs 41.7% at second year, p = 0.0059) and supported the trend observed in nonadjusted analysis (21.2% vs 27.1% at 1 year, p = 0.0775). Such statistically significant associations were also observed for gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesions and new T2 lesions at both 1 year (Gd-enhancing lesions: 9.3% vs 29.8%, p < 0.0001; new T2 lesions: 10.6% vs 29.6%, p < 0.0001) and 2 years (Gd-enhancing lesions: 9.1% vs 22.1%, p = 0.0025; new T2 lesions: 16.9% vs 34.1%, p = 0.0010) post treatment initiation. CONCLUSION: Taken together, these results suggest the superiority of natalizumab over fingolimod to prevent relapses and new T2 and Gd-enhancing lesions at 1 and 2 years. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with RRMS, natalizumab decreases the proportion of patients with at least one relapse within the first year of treatment compared to fingolimod. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4763805 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47638052016-03-08 Comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: A French multicenter observational study Barbin, Laetitia Rousseau, Chloe Jousset, Natacha Casey, Romain Debouverie, Marc Vukusic, Sandra De Sèze, Jerome Brassat, David Wiertlewski, Sandrine Brochet, Bruno Pelletier, Jean Vermersch, Patrick Edan, Gilles Lebrun-Frenay, Christine Clavelou, Pierre Thouvenot, Eric Camdessanché, Jean-Philippe Tourbah, Ayman Stankoff, Bruno Al Khedr, Abdullatif Cabre, Philippe Papeix, Caroline Berger, Eric Heinzlef, Olivier Debroucker, Thomas Moreau, Thibault Gout, Olivier Bourre, Bertrand Créange, Alain Labauge, Pierre Magy, Laurent Defer, Gilles Foucher, Yohann Laplaud, David A. Neurology Article OBJECTIVE: To compare natalizumab and fingolimod on both clinical and MRI outcomes in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) from 27 multiple sclerosis centers participating in the French follow-up cohort Observatoire of Multiple Sclerosis. METHODS: Patients with RRMS included in the study were aged from 18 to 65 years with an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 0–5.5 and an available brain MRI performed within the year before treatment initiation. The data were collected for 326 patients treated with natalizumab and 303 with fingolimod. The statistical analysis was performed using 2 different methods: logistic regression and propensity scores (inverse probability treatment weighting). RESULTS: The confounder-adjusted proportion of patients with at least one relapse within the first and second year of treatment was lower in natalizumab-treated patients compared to the fingolimod group (21.1% vs 30.4% at first year, p = 0.0092; and 30.9% vs 41.7% at second year, p = 0.0059) and supported the trend observed in nonadjusted analysis (21.2% vs 27.1% at 1 year, p = 0.0775). Such statistically significant associations were also observed for gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesions and new T2 lesions at both 1 year (Gd-enhancing lesions: 9.3% vs 29.8%, p < 0.0001; new T2 lesions: 10.6% vs 29.6%, p < 0.0001) and 2 years (Gd-enhancing lesions: 9.1% vs 22.1%, p = 0.0025; new T2 lesions: 16.9% vs 34.1%, p = 0.0010) post treatment initiation. CONCLUSION: Taken together, these results suggest the superiority of natalizumab over fingolimod to prevent relapses and new T2 and Gd-enhancing lesions at 1 and 2 years. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with RRMS, natalizumab decreases the proportion of patients with at least one relapse within the first year of treatment compared to fingolimod. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4763805/ /pubmed/26826205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002395 Text en © 2016 American Academy of Neurology This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. |
spellingShingle | Article Barbin, Laetitia Rousseau, Chloe Jousset, Natacha Casey, Romain Debouverie, Marc Vukusic, Sandra De Sèze, Jerome Brassat, David Wiertlewski, Sandrine Brochet, Bruno Pelletier, Jean Vermersch, Patrick Edan, Gilles Lebrun-Frenay, Christine Clavelou, Pierre Thouvenot, Eric Camdessanché, Jean-Philippe Tourbah, Ayman Stankoff, Bruno Al Khedr, Abdullatif Cabre, Philippe Papeix, Caroline Berger, Eric Heinzlef, Olivier Debroucker, Thomas Moreau, Thibault Gout, Olivier Bourre, Bertrand Créange, Alain Labauge, Pierre Magy, Laurent Defer, Gilles Foucher, Yohann Laplaud, David A. Comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: A French multicenter observational study |
title | Comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: A French multicenter observational study |
title_full | Comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: A French multicenter observational study |
title_fullStr | Comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: A French multicenter observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: A French multicenter observational study |
title_short | Comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: A French multicenter observational study |
title_sort | comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: a french multicenter observational study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4763805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26826205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002395 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barbinlaetitia comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT rousseauchloe comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT joussetnatacha comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT caseyromain comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT debouveriemarc comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT vukusicsandra comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT desezejerome comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT brassatdavid comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT wiertlewskisandrine comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT brochetbruno comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT pelletierjean comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT vermerschpatrick comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT edangilles comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT lebrunfrenaychristine comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT claveloupierre comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT thouvenoteric comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT camdessanchejeanphilippe comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT tourbahayman comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT stankoffbruno comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT alkhedrabdullatif comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT cabrephilippe comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT papeixcaroline comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT bergereric comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT heinzlefolivier comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT debrouckerthomas comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT moreauthibault comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT goutolivier comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT bourrebertrand comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT creangealain comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT labaugepierre comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT magylaurent comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT defergilles comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT foucheryohann comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy AT laplauddavida comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy |