Cargando…

Comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: A French multicenter observational study

OBJECTIVE: To compare natalizumab and fingolimod on both clinical and MRI outcomes in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) from 27 multiple sclerosis centers participating in the French follow-up cohort Observatoire of Multiple Sclerosis. METHODS: Patients with RRMS included i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barbin, Laetitia, Rousseau, Chloe, Jousset, Natacha, Casey, Romain, Debouverie, Marc, Vukusic, Sandra, De Sèze, Jerome, Brassat, David, Wiertlewski, Sandrine, Brochet, Bruno, Pelletier, Jean, Vermersch, Patrick, Edan, Gilles, Lebrun-Frenay, Christine, Clavelou, Pierre, Thouvenot, Eric, Camdessanché, Jean-Philippe, Tourbah, Ayman, Stankoff, Bruno, Al Khedr, Abdullatif, Cabre, Philippe, Papeix, Caroline, Berger, Eric, Heinzlef, Olivier, Debroucker, Thomas, Moreau, Thibault, Gout, Olivier, Bourre, Bertrand, Créange, Alain, Labauge, Pierre, Magy, Laurent, Defer, Gilles, Foucher, Yohann, Laplaud, David A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4763805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26826205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002395
_version_ 1782417318820708352
author Barbin, Laetitia
Rousseau, Chloe
Jousset, Natacha
Casey, Romain
Debouverie, Marc
Vukusic, Sandra
De Sèze, Jerome
Brassat, David
Wiertlewski, Sandrine
Brochet, Bruno
Pelletier, Jean
Vermersch, Patrick
Edan, Gilles
Lebrun-Frenay, Christine
Clavelou, Pierre
Thouvenot, Eric
Camdessanché, Jean-Philippe
Tourbah, Ayman
Stankoff, Bruno
Al Khedr, Abdullatif
Cabre, Philippe
Papeix, Caroline
Berger, Eric
Heinzlef, Olivier
Debroucker, Thomas
Moreau, Thibault
Gout, Olivier
Bourre, Bertrand
Créange, Alain
Labauge, Pierre
Magy, Laurent
Defer, Gilles
Foucher, Yohann
Laplaud, David A.
author_facet Barbin, Laetitia
Rousseau, Chloe
Jousset, Natacha
Casey, Romain
Debouverie, Marc
Vukusic, Sandra
De Sèze, Jerome
Brassat, David
Wiertlewski, Sandrine
Brochet, Bruno
Pelletier, Jean
Vermersch, Patrick
Edan, Gilles
Lebrun-Frenay, Christine
Clavelou, Pierre
Thouvenot, Eric
Camdessanché, Jean-Philippe
Tourbah, Ayman
Stankoff, Bruno
Al Khedr, Abdullatif
Cabre, Philippe
Papeix, Caroline
Berger, Eric
Heinzlef, Olivier
Debroucker, Thomas
Moreau, Thibault
Gout, Olivier
Bourre, Bertrand
Créange, Alain
Labauge, Pierre
Magy, Laurent
Defer, Gilles
Foucher, Yohann
Laplaud, David A.
author_sort Barbin, Laetitia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare natalizumab and fingolimod on both clinical and MRI outcomes in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) from 27 multiple sclerosis centers participating in the French follow-up cohort Observatoire of Multiple Sclerosis. METHODS: Patients with RRMS included in the study were aged from 18 to 65 years with an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 0–5.5 and an available brain MRI performed within the year before treatment initiation. The data were collected for 326 patients treated with natalizumab and 303 with fingolimod. The statistical analysis was performed using 2 different methods: logistic regression and propensity scores (inverse probability treatment weighting). RESULTS: The confounder-adjusted proportion of patients with at least one relapse within the first and second year of treatment was lower in natalizumab-treated patients compared to the fingolimod group (21.1% vs 30.4% at first year, p = 0.0092; and 30.9% vs 41.7% at second year, p = 0.0059) and supported the trend observed in nonadjusted analysis (21.2% vs 27.1% at 1 year, p = 0.0775). Such statistically significant associations were also observed for gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesions and new T2 lesions at both 1 year (Gd-enhancing lesions: 9.3% vs 29.8%, p < 0.0001; new T2 lesions: 10.6% vs 29.6%, p < 0.0001) and 2 years (Gd-enhancing lesions: 9.1% vs 22.1%, p = 0.0025; new T2 lesions: 16.9% vs 34.1%, p = 0.0010) post treatment initiation. CONCLUSION: Taken together, these results suggest the superiority of natalizumab over fingolimod to prevent relapses and new T2 and Gd-enhancing lesions at 1 and 2 years. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with RRMS, natalizumab decreases the proportion of patients with at least one relapse within the first year of treatment compared to fingolimod.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4763805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47638052016-03-08 Comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: A French multicenter observational study Barbin, Laetitia Rousseau, Chloe Jousset, Natacha Casey, Romain Debouverie, Marc Vukusic, Sandra De Sèze, Jerome Brassat, David Wiertlewski, Sandrine Brochet, Bruno Pelletier, Jean Vermersch, Patrick Edan, Gilles Lebrun-Frenay, Christine Clavelou, Pierre Thouvenot, Eric Camdessanché, Jean-Philippe Tourbah, Ayman Stankoff, Bruno Al Khedr, Abdullatif Cabre, Philippe Papeix, Caroline Berger, Eric Heinzlef, Olivier Debroucker, Thomas Moreau, Thibault Gout, Olivier Bourre, Bertrand Créange, Alain Labauge, Pierre Magy, Laurent Defer, Gilles Foucher, Yohann Laplaud, David A. Neurology Article OBJECTIVE: To compare natalizumab and fingolimod on both clinical and MRI outcomes in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) from 27 multiple sclerosis centers participating in the French follow-up cohort Observatoire of Multiple Sclerosis. METHODS: Patients with RRMS included in the study were aged from 18 to 65 years with an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 0–5.5 and an available brain MRI performed within the year before treatment initiation. The data were collected for 326 patients treated with natalizumab and 303 with fingolimod. The statistical analysis was performed using 2 different methods: logistic regression and propensity scores (inverse probability treatment weighting). RESULTS: The confounder-adjusted proportion of patients with at least one relapse within the first and second year of treatment was lower in natalizumab-treated patients compared to the fingolimod group (21.1% vs 30.4% at first year, p = 0.0092; and 30.9% vs 41.7% at second year, p = 0.0059) and supported the trend observed in nonadjusted analysis (21.2% vs 27.1% at 1 year, p = 0.0775). Such statistically significant associations were also observed for gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesions and new T2 lesions at both 1 year (Gd-enhancing lesions: 9.3% vs 29.8%, p < 0.0001; new T2 lesions: 10.6% vs 29.6%, p < 0.0001) and 2 years (Gd-enhancing lesions: 9.1% vs 22.1%, p = 0.0025; new T2 lesions: 16.9% vs 34.1%, p = 0.0010) post treatment initiation. CONCLUSION: Taken together, these results suggest the superiority of natalizumab over fingolimod to prevent relapses and new T2 and Gd-enhancing lesions at 1 and 2 years. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with RRMS, natalizumab decreases the proportion of patients with at least one relapse within the first year of treatment compared to fingolimod. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4763805/ /pubmed/26826205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002395 Text en © 2016 American Academy of Neurology This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Article
Barbin, Laetitia
Rousseau, Chloe
Jousset, Natacha
Casey, Romain
Debouverie, Marc
Vukusic, Sandra
De Sèze, Jerome
Brassat, David
Wiertlewski, Sandrine
Brochet, Bruno
Pelletier, Jean
Vermersch, Patrick
Edan, Gilles
Lebrun-Frenay, Christine
Clavelou, Pierre
Thouvenot, Eric
Camdessanché, Jean-Philippe
Tourbah, Ayman
Stankoff, Bruno
Al Khedr, Abdullatif
Cabre, Philippe
Papeix, Caroline
Berger, Eric
Heinzlef, Olivier
Debroucker, Thomas
Moreau, Thibault
Gout, Olivier
Bourre, Bertrand
Créange, Alain
Labauge, Pierre
Magy, Laurent
Defer, Gilles
Foucher, Yohann
Laplaud, David A.
Comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: A French multicenter observational study
title Comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: A French multicenter observational study
title_full Comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: A French multicenter observational study
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: A French multicenter observational study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: A French multicenter observational study
title_short Comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: A French multicenter observational study
title_sort comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: a french multicenter observational study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4763805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26826205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002395
work_keys_str_mv AT barbinlaetitia comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT rousseauchloe comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT joussetnatacha comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT caseyromain comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT debouveriemarc comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT vukusicsandra comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT desezejerome comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT brassatdavid comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT wiertlewskisandrine comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT brochetbruno comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT pelletierjean comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT vermerschpatrick comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT edangilles comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT lebrunfrenaychristine comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT claveloupierre comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT thouvenoteric comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT camdessanchejeanphilippe comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT tourbahayman comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT stankoffbruno comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT alkhedrabdullatif comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT cabrephilippe comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT papeixcaroline comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT bergereric comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT heinzlefolivier comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT debrouckerthomas comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT moreauthibault comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT goutolivier comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT bourrebertrand comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT creangealain comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT labaugepierre comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT magylaurent comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT defergilles comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT foucheryohann comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy
AT laplauddavida comparativeefficacyoffingolimodvsnatalizumabafrenchmulticenterobservationalstudy